Cargando…

It’s a match!? Appropriate item selection in the Concealed Information Test

BACKGROUND: While the Concealed Information Test (CIT) can determine whether examinees recognize critical details, it does not clarify the origin of the memory. Hence, when unknowledgeable suspects are contaminated with crime information through media channels or investigative interviews, the validi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Geven, Linda Marjoleine, Ben-Shakhar, Gershon, Kindt, Merel, Verschuere, Bruno
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6447635/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30945051
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41235-019-0161-8
_version_ 1783408535993843712
author Geven, Linda Marjoleine
Ben-Shakhar, Gershon
Kindt, Merel
Verschuere, Bruno
author_facet Geven, Linda Marjoleine
Ben-Shakhar, Gershon
Kindt, Merel
Verschuere, Bruno
author_sort Geven, Linda Marjoleine
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: While the Concealed Information Test (CIT) can determine whether examinees recognize critical details, it does not clarify the origin of the memory. Hence, when unknowledgeable suspects are contaminated with crime information through media channels or investigative interviews, the validity of the CIT can be compromised (i.e. false-positive outcomes). Yet, when the information was disclosed solely at the category level (e.g. the perpetrator escaped in a car), presenting specific items at the exemplar level (e.g. Citroën, Opel, or Volkswagen) might preclude this problem. However, diminished recollection for exemplar-level details could attenuate the CIT effect for knowledgeable suspects, thereby leading to false negatives. The appropriate item level for memory detection to reach an optimal balance between sensitivity and specificity remains elusive. As encoding, retention, and retrieval of information may influence memory performance and thereby memory detection, the current study investigated the validity of the CIT on both categorical and exemplar levels. RESULTS: Participants planned a mock robbery (n = 165), with information encoded at the category (e.g. car) or exemplar (e.g. Citroën) level. They were tested immediately or after a one-week-delay, with a response time-based CIT consisting of questions at the categorical or exemplar level. An interaction was found between encoding and testing, such that CIT validity based on reaction time was higher for “matching” (e.g. exemplar-exemplar) than for “mismatching” (e.g. exemplar-categorical) items, while immediate versus one week delayed testing did not affect the outcome. CONCLUSION: Critically, this indicates that what constitutes a good CIT item depends on the way the information was encoded. This provides a challenge for CIT examiners when selecting appropriate items. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s41235-019-0161-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6447635
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64476352019-04-20 It’s a match!? Appropriate item selection in the Concealed Information Test Geven, Linda Marjoleine Ben-Shakhar, Gershon Kindt, Merel Verschuere, Bruno Cogn Res Princ Implic Original Article BACKGROUND: While the Concealed Information Test (CIT) can determine whether examinees recognize critical details, it does not clarify the origin of the memory. Hence, when unknowledgeable suspects are contaminated with crime information through media channels or investigative interviews, the validity of the CIT can be compromised (i.e. false-positive outcomes). Yet, when the information was disclosed solely at the category level (e.g. the perpetrator escaped in a car), presenting specific items at the exemplar level (e.g. Citroën, Opel, or Volkswagen) might preclude this problem. However, diminished recollection for exemplar-level details could attenuate the CIT effect for knowledgeable suspects, thereby leading to false negatives. The appropriate item level for memory detection to reach an optimal balance between sensitivity and specificity remains elusive. As encoding, retention, and retrieval of information may influence memory performance and thereby memory detection, the current study investigated the validity of the CIT on both categorical and exemplar levels. RESULTS: Participants planned a mock robbery (n = 165), with information encoded at the category (e.g. car) or exemplar (e.g. Citroën) level. They were tested immediately or after a one-week-delay, with a response time-based CIT consisting of questions at the categorical or exemplar level. An interaction was found between encoding and testing, such that CIT validity based on reaction time was higher for “matching” (e.g. exemplar-exemplar) than for “mismatching” (e.g. exemplar-categorical) items, while immediate versus one week delayed testing did not affect the outcome. CONCLUSION: Critically, this indicates that what constitutes a good CIT item depends on the way the information was encoded. This provides a challenge for CIT examiners when selecting appropriate items. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s41235-019-0161-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer International Publishing 2019-04-03 /pmc/articles/PMC6447635/ /pubmed/30945051 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41235-019-0161-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Original Article
Geven, Linda Marjoleine
Ben-Shakhar, Gershon
Kindt, Merel
Verschuere, Bruno
It’s a match!? Appropriate item selection in the Concealed Information Test
title It’s a match!? Appropriate item selection in the Concealed Information Test
title_full It’s a match!? Appropriate item selection in the Concealed Information Test
title_fullStr It’s a match!? Appropriate item selection in the Concealed Information Test
title_full_unstemmed It’s a match!? Appropriate item selection in the Concealed Information Test
title_short It’s a match!? Appropriate item selection in the Concealed Information Test
title_sort it’s a match!? appropriate item selection in the concealed information test
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6447635/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30945051
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41235-019-0161-8
work_keys_str_mv AT gevenlindamarjoleine itsamatchappropriateitemselectionintheconcealedinformationtest
AT benshakhargershon itsamatchappropriateitemselectionintheconcealedinformationtest
AT kindtmerel itsamatchappropriateitemselectionintheconcealedinformationtest
AT verschuerebruno itsamatchappropriateitemselectionintheconcealedinformationtest