Cargando…

“Surprise” and the Bayesian Brain: Implications for Psychotherapy Theory and Practice

The free energy principle (FEP) has gained widespread interest and growing acceptance as a new paradigm of brain function, but has had little impact on the theory and practice of psychotherapy. The aim of this paper is to redress this. Brains rely on Bayesian inference during which “bottom-up” sensa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Holmes, Jeremy, Nolte, Tobias
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6447687/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30984063
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00592
_version_ 1783408548072390656
author Holmes, Jeremy
Nolte, Tobias
author_facet Holmes, Jeremy
Nolte, Tobias
author_sort Holmes, Jeremy
collection PubMed
description The free energy principle (FEP) has gained widespread interest and growing acceptance as a new paradigm of brain function, but has had little impact on the theory and practice of psychotherapy. The aim of this paper is to redress this. Brains rely on Bayesian inference during which “bottom-up” sensations are matched with “top-down” predictions. Discrepancies result in “prediction error.” The brain abhors informational “surprise,” which is minimized by (1) action enhancing the statistical likelihood of sensory samples, (2) revising inferences in the light of experience, updating “priors” to reality-aligned “posteriors,” and (3) optimizing the complexity of our generative models of a capricious world. In all three, free energy is converted to bound energy. In psychopathology energy either remains unbound, as in trauma and inhibition of agency, or manifests restricted, anachronistic “top-down” narratives. Psychotherapy fosters client agency, linguistic and practical. Temporary uncoupling bottom-up from top-down automatism and fostering scrutinized simulations sets a number of salutary processes in train. Mentalising enriches Bayesian inference, enabling experience and feeling states to be “metabolized” and assimilated. “Free association” enhances more inclusive sensory sampling, while dream analysis foregrounds salient emotional themes as “attractors.” FEP parallels with psychoanalytic theory are outlined, including Freud’s unpublished project, Bion’s “contact barrier” concept, the Fonagy/Target model of sexuality, Laplanche’s therapist as “enigmatic signifier,” and the role of projective identification. The therapy stimulates patients to become aware of and revise the priors’ they bring to interpersonal experience. In the therapeutic “duet for one,” the energy binding skills and non-partisan stance of the analyst help sufferers face trauma without being overwhelmed by psychic entropy. Overall, the FEP provides a sound theoretical basis for psychotherapy practice, training, and research.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6447687
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64476872019-04-12 “Surprise” and the Bayesian Brain: Implications for Psychotherapy Theory and Practice Holmes, Jeremy Nolte, Tobias Front Psychol Psychology The free energy principle (FEP) has gained widespread interest and growing acceptance as a new paradigm of brain function, but has had little impact on the theory and practice of psychotherapy. The aim of this paper is to redress this. Brains rely on Bayesian inference during which “bottom-up” sensations are matched with “top-down” predictions. Discrepancies result in “prediction error.” The brain abhors informational “surprise,” which is minimized by (1) action enhancing the statistical likelihood of sensory samples, (2) revising inferences in the light of experience, updating “priors” to reality-aligned “posteriors,” and (3) optimizing the complexity of our generative models of a capricious world. In all three, free energy is converted to bound energy. In psychopathology energy either remains unbound, as in trauma and inhibition of agency, or manifests restricted, anachronistic “top-down” narratives. Psychotherapy fosters client agency, linguistic and practical. Temporary uncoupling bottom-up from top-down automatism and fostering scrutinized simulations sets a number of salutary processes in train. Mentalising enriches Bayesian inference, enabling experience and feeling states to be “metabolized” and assimilated. “Free association” enhances more inclusive sensory sampling, while dream analysis foregrounds salient emotional themes as “attractors.” FEP parallels with psychoanalytic theory are outlined, including Freud’s unpublished project, Bion’s “contact barrier” concept, the Fonagy/Target model of sexuality, Laplanche’s therapist as “enigmatic signifier,” and the role of projective identification. The therapy stimulates patients to become aware of and revise the priors’ they bring to interpersonal experience. In the therapeutic “duet for one,” the energy binding skills and non-partisan stance of the analyst help sufferers face trauma without being overwhelmed by psychic entropy. Overall, the FEP provides a sound theoretical basis for psychotherapy practice, training, and research. Frontiers Media S.A. 2019-03-28 /pmc/articles/PMC6447687/ /pubmed/30984063 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00592 Text en Copyright © 2019 Holmes and Nolte. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychology
Holmes, Jeremy
Nolte, Tobias
“Surprise” and the Bayesian Brain: Implications for Psychotherapy Theory and Practice
title “Surprise” and the Bayesian Brain: Implications for Psychotherapy Theory and Practice
title_full “Surprise” and the Bayesian Brain: Implications for Psychotherapy Theory and Practice
title_fullStr “Surprise” and the Bayesian Brain: Implications for Psychotherapy Theory and Practice
title_full_unstemmed “Surprise” and the Bayesian Brain: Implications for Psychotherapy Theory and Practice
title_short “Surprise” and the Bayesian Brain: Implications for Psychotherapy Theory and Practice
title_sort “surprise” and the bayesian brain: implications for psychotherapy theory and practice
topic Psychology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6447687/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30984063
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00592
work_keys_str_mv AT holmesjeremy surpriseandthebayesianbrainimplicationsforpsychotherapytheoryandpractice
AT noltetobias surpriseandthebayesianbrainimplicationsforpsychotherapytheoryandpractice