Cargando…

Comparative study on typhoon’s wind speed prediction by a neural networks model and a hydrodynamical model

There are many models to predict natural phenomena around the world, but it is still difficult to accurately forecast the events. Many scientists, modeling professions, students, and researchers working on the tropical cyclones prediction, but they are encountered to many errors during compiling and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Haghroosta, Tahereh
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6447746/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30989055
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mex.2019.03.002
_version_ 1783408561302274048
author Haghroosta, Tahereh
author_facet Haghroosta, Tahereh
author_sort Haghroosta, Tahereh
collection PubMed
description There are many models to predict natural phenomena around the world, but it is still difficult to accurately forecast the events. Many scientists, modeling professions, students, and researchers working on the tropical cyclones prediction, but they are encountered to many errors during compiling and configuring the models. Despite the increasing accuracy of weather forecasts, there is an element of uncertainty in all predictions. This paper reviews two methods used in my previous papers for predicting typhoon wind speed in the South China Sea, a dynamical model, Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF), and an Adaptive Neuro-Fuzzy Inference System (ANFIS) model. The performances of the models are calculated using statistical parameters of the root mean square error (RMSE) and Correlation Coefficient (CC), and the advantages and disadvantages of both models are represented. Regarding the statistical parameters values, the ANFIS model in comparison with the WRF model showed higher accuracy for typhoon intensity prediction because of higher CC and lower RMSE. The development of methods has represented several advanced techniques that their strengths and weaknesses have not been well-documented. In fact, a qualitative assessment and points to several ways in which the methods may be able to complement each other. The paper suggests that the scientists should improve the concepts of the models. • Investigating two different methods and their performance in predicting typhoon intensity. • Representing the strengths and weaknesses of both models. • Suggesting some solutions for future researches.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6447746
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64477462019-04-15 Comparative study on typhoon’s wind speed prediction by a neural networks model and a hydrodynamical model Haghroosta, Tahereh MethodsX Earth and Planetary Science There are many models to predict natural phenomena around the world, but it is still difficult to accurately forecast the events. Many scientists, modeling professions, students, and researchers working on the tropical cyclones prediction, but they are encountered to many errors during compiling and configuring the models. Despite the increasing accuracy of weather forecasts, there is an element of uncertainty in all predictions. This paper reviews two methods used in my previous papers for predicting typhoon wind speed in the South China Sea, a dynamical model, Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF), and an Adaptive Neuro-Fuzzy Inference System (ANFIS) model. The performances of the models are calculated using statistical parameters of the root mean square error (RMSE) and Correlation Coefficient (CC), and the advantages and disadvantages of both models are represented. Regarding the statistical parameters values, the ANFIS model in comparison with the WRF model showed higher accuracy for typhoon intensity prediction because of higher CC and lower RMSE. The development of methods has represented several advanced techniques that their strengths and weaknesses have not been well-documented. In fact, a qualitative assessment and points to several ways in which the methods may be able to complement each other. The paper suggests that the scientists should improve the concepts of the models. • Investigating two different methods and their performance in predicting typhoon intensity. • Representing the strengths and weaknesses of both models. • Suggesting some solutions for future researches. Elsevier 2019-03-21 /pmc/articles/PMC6447746/ /pubmed/30989055 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mex.2019.03.002 Text en © 2019 Published by Elsevier B.V. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Earth and Planetary Science
Haghroosta, Tahereh
Comparative study on typhoon’s wind speed prediction by a neural networks model and a hydrodynamical model
title Comparative study on typhoon’s wind speed prediction by a neural networks model and a hydrodynamical model
title_full Comparative study on typhoon’s wind speed prediction by a neural networks model and a hydrodynamical model
title_fullStr Comparative study on typhoon’s wind speed prediction by a neural networks model and a hydrodynamical model
title_full_unstemmed Comparative study on typhoon’s wind speed prediction by a neural networks model and a hydrodynamical model
title_short Comparative study on typhoon’s wind speed prediction by a neural networks model and a hydrodynamical model
title_sort comparative study on typhoon’s wind speed prediction by a neural networks model and a hydrodynamical model
topic Earth and Planetary Science
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6447746/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30989055
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mex.2019.03.002
work_keys_str_mv AT haghroostatahereh comparativestudyontyphoonswindspeedpredictionbyaneuralnetworksmodelandahydrodynamicalmodel