Cargando…
Muscle characteristics in chicks challenged with Salmonella Enteritidis and the effect of preventive application of the probiotic Enterococcus faecium
The present study was conducted to assess the effects of the probiotic Enterococcus faecium AL41 (EF) and of the enteric pathogen Salmonella Enteritidis PT4 (SE) on the development of posthatch pectoralis major muscle (PM) of broiler chicks. The four experimental groups were control (CON), EF, SE, a...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Poultry Science Association, Inc.
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6448134/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30590796 http://dx.doi.org/10.3382/ps/pey561 |
_version_ | 1783408639825936384 |
---|---|
author | Zitnan, R Albrecht, E Kalbe, C Miersch, C Revajova, V Levkut, M Röntgen, M |
author_facet | Zitnan, R Albrecht, E Kalbe, C Miersch, C Revajova, V Levkut, M Röntgen, M |
author_sort | Zitnan, R |
collection | PubMed |
description | The present study was conducted to assess the effects of the probiotic Enterococcus faecium AL41 (EF) and of the enteric pathogen Salmonella Enteritidis PT4 (SE) on the development of posthatch pectoralis major muscle (PM) of broiler chicks. The four experimental groups were control (CON), EF, SE, and EF+SE (EFSE). EF and SE were given per os from days 1 to 7 and at day 4 posthatch, respectively. Muscle samples from 6 chicks per group were taken at day 8 (D8) and day 11 (D11) to evaluate PM myofiber growth, capillarization, DNA, RNA, and protein content, as well as enzyme activities (isocitrate dehydrogenase, lactate dehydrogenase, creatine kinase). PM growth rate was 7.45 ± 2.7 g/d in non-SE groups (CON, EF) and 5.10 ± 1.82 g/d in SE-infected groups (P < 0.02). Compared with group CON, application of bacteria (groups EF and SE) reduced the fiber cross-sectional area (246 and 262 vs. 347 ± 19 μm(2)) and the number of myonuclei per fiber (0.66 and 0.64 vs. 0.79 ± 0.03). At D11, hypertrophic myofiber growth normalized in the EF group, but negative effects persisted in SE and EFSE birds contributing to lower daily PM gain. In addition, SE infection strongly disturbed PM capillarization. Negative effects on capillary cross-sectional area and on the area (%) covered by capillaries persisted until D11 in the SE group, whereas pre-feeding of EF restored capillarization in the EFSE group to control levels. We conclude that supplementation of the probiotic bacteria EF AL41 had positive effects on PM capillarization and, thus, on delivery of O(2), supply of nutrients, and removal of metabolites. Supplementation of probiotic bacteria might therefore reduce energetic stress and improve muscle health and meat quality during SE infection. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6448134 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Poultry Science Association, Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-64481342019-04-08 Muscle characteristics in chicks challenged with Salmonella Enteritidis and the effect of preventive application of the probiotic Enterococcus faecium Zitnan, R Albrecht, E Kalbe, C Miersch, C Revajova, V Levkut, M Röntgen, M Poult Sci Immunology, Health and Disease The present study was conducted to assess the effects of the probiotic Enterococcus faecium AL41 (EF) and of the enteric pathogen Salmonella Enteritidis PT4 (SE) on the development of posthatch pectoralis major muscle (PM) of broiler chicks. The four experimental groups were control (CON), EF, SE, and EF+SE (EFSE). EF and SE were given per os from days 1 to 7 and at day 4 posthatch, respectively. Muscle samples from 6 chicks per group were taken at day 8 (D8) and day 11 (D11) to evaluate PM myofiber growth, capillarization, DNA, RNA, and protein content, as well as enzyme activities (isocitrate dehydrogenase, lactate dehydrogenase, creatine kinase). PM growth rate was 7.45 ± 2.7 g/d in non-SE groups (CON, EF) and 5.10 ± 1.82 g/d in SE-infected groups (P < 0.02). Compared with group CON, application of bacteria (groups EF and SE) reduced the fiber cross-sectional area (246 and 262 vs. 347 ± 19 μm(2)) and the number of myonuclei per fiber (0.66 and 0.64 vs. 0.79 ± 0.03). At D11, hypertrophic myofiber growth normalized in the EF group, but negative effects persisted in SE and EFSE birds contributing to lower daily PM gain. In addition, SE infection strongly disturbed PM capillarization. Negative effects on capillary cross-sectional area and on the area (%) covered by capillaries persisted until D11 in the SE group, whereas pre-feeding of EF restored capillarization in the EFSE group to control levels. We conclude that supplementation of the probiotic bacteria EF AL41 had positive effects on PM capillarization and, thus, on delivery of O(2), supply of nutrients, and removal of metabolites. Supplementation of probiotic bacteria might therefore reduce energetic stress and improve muscle health and meat quality during SE infection. Poultry Science Association, Inc. 2019-05 2018-12-26 /pmc/articles/PMC6448134/ /pubmed/30590796 http://dx.doi.org/10.3382/ps/pey561 Text en © The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Poultry Science Association. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com |
spellingShingle | Immunology, Health and Disease Zitnan, R Albrecht, E Kalbe, C Miersch, C Revajova, V Levkut, M Röntgen, M Muscle characteristics in chicks challenged with Salmonella Enteritidis and the effect of preventive application of the probiotic Enterococcus faecium |
title | Muscle characteristics in chicks challenged with Salmonella Enteritidis and the effect of preventive application of the probiotic Enterococcus faecium |
title_full | Muscle characteristics in chicks challenged with Salmonella Enteritidis and the effect of preventive application of the probiotic Enterococcus faecium |
title_fullStr | Muscle characteristics in chicks challenged with Salmonella Enteritidis and the effect of preventive application of the probiotic Enterococcus faecium |
title_full_unstemmed | Muscle characteristics in chicks challenged with Salmonella Enteritidis and the effect of preventive application of the probiotic Enterococcus faecium |
title_short | Muscle characteristics in chicks challenged with Salmonella Enteritidis and the effect of preventive application of the probiotic Enterococcus faecium |
title_sort | muscle characteristics in chicks challenged with salmonella enteritidis and the effect of preventive application of the probiotic enterococcus faecium |
topic | Immunology, Health and Disease |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6448134/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30590796 http://dx.doi.org/10.3382/ps/pey561 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zitnanr musclecharacteristicsinchickschallengedwithsalmonellaenteritidisandtheeffectofpreventiveapplicationoftheprobioticenterococcusfaecium AT albrechte musclecharacteristicsinchickschallengedwithsalmonellaenteritidisandtheeffectofpreventiveapplicationoftheprobioticenterococcusfaecium AT kalbec musclecharacteristicsinchickschallengedwithsalmonellaenteritidisandtheeffectofpreventiveapplicationoftheprobioticenterococcusfaecium AT mierschc musclecharacteristicsinchickschallengedwithsalmonellaenteritidisandtheeffectofpreventiveapplicationoftheprobioticenterococcusfaecium AT revajovav musclecharacteristicsinchickschallengedwithsalmonellaenteritidisandtheeffectofpreventiveapplicationoftheprobioticenterococcusfaecium AT levkutm musclecharacteristicsinchickschallengedwithsalmonellaenteritidisandtheeffectofpreventiveapplicationoftheprobioticenterococcusfaecium AT rontgenm musclecharacteristicsinchickschallengedwithsalmonellaenteritidisandtheeffectofpreventiveapplicationoftheprobioticenterococcusfaecium |