Cargando…

Characterization of the Halcyon(TM) multileaf collimator system

PURPOSE: To characterize the stacked and staggered dual‐layer multileaf collimator (MLC) on the Halcyon(TM) system. METHODS: The novel MLC assembly was reviewed and compared to the widely used Millennium(TM) 120‐leaf MLC system. We investigated the MLC positioning stability over 70 days using Machin...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lim, Tze Yee, Dragojević, Irena, Hoffman, David, Flores‐Martinez, Everardo, Kim, Gwe‐Ya
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6448159/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30889312
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12568
_version_ 1783408641317011456
author Lim, Tze Yee
Dragojević, Irena
Hoffman, David
Flores‐Martinez, Everardo
Kim, Gwe‐Ya
author_facet Lim, Tze Yee
Dragojević, Irena
Hoffman, David
Flores‐Martinez, Everardo
Kim, Gwe‐Ya
author_sort Lim, Tze Yee
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To characterize the stacked and staggered dual‐layer multileaf collimator (MLC) on the Halcyon(TM) system. METHODS: The novel MLC assembly was reviewed and compared to the widely used Millennium(TM) 120‐leaf MLC system. We investigated the MLC positioning stability over 70 days using Machine Performance Check (MPC) data. We evaluated the leaf transmission, penumbra, leaf end effect, and leaf edge effect. Leaf transmission through distal, proximal, and both MLC layers was measured with a Farmer chamber, by comparing an open and a closed field. Leaf penumbra was measured using film for three different MLC‐defined field sizes. The leaf end effect was measured with sweeping gap fields of varying gap sizes defined by the distal MLC. The leaf edge effect was evaluated using the Electronic Portal Imaging Device (EPID) for the different banks, gantry positions, and collimator angles. Point dose measurements for 10 test plans were compared to dose predictions of two dose calculation model versions. RESULTS: From MPC data, the largest measured MLC positioning accuracy deviation was within 0.1 mm. The proximal MLC exhibited greater deviations compared to the distal MLC. The distal‐and‐proximal‐combination had reduced inter‐leaf and intra‐leaf transmission compared to delivery with distal‐only. The measured leaf transmission was 0.41% for distal‐only, 0.40% for proximal‐only, and negligible for distal‐and‐proximal‐combination. The leaf end penumbra was wider compared to the leaf edge penumbra. The leaf end effect was measured to be −0.2 mm. The leaf edge effect showed minimal bank, gantry position, and collimator angle dependence. However, a systematic deviation between measurements and treatment planning system handling of the leaf edge effect was observed. The discrepancy between the measured and predicted dose in the 10 test plans improved with the latest version of the dose calculation algorithm. CONCLUSION: The characteristics of the stacked and staggered dual‐layer MLC on the Halcyon(TM) system were presented.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6448159
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64481592019-04-15 Characterization of the Halcyon(TM) multileaf collimator system Lim, Tze Yee Dragojević, Irena Hoffman, David Flores‐Martinez, Everardo Kim, Gwe‐Ya J Appl Clin Med Phys Radiation Oncology Physics PURPOSE: To characterize the stacked and staggered dual‐layer multileaf collimator (MLC) on the Halcyon(TM) system. METHODS: The novel MLC assembly was reviewed and compared to the widely used Millennium(TM) 120‐leaf MLC system. We investigated the MLC positioning stability over 70 days using Machine Performance Check (MPC) data. We evaluated the leaf transmission, penumbra, leaf end effect, and leaf edge effect. Leaf transmission through distal, proximal, and both MLC layers was measured with a Farmer chamber, by comparing an open and a closed field. Leaf penumbra was measured using film for three different MLC‐defined field sizes. The leaf end effect was measured with sweeping gap fields of varying gap sizes defined by the distal MLC. The leaf edge effect was evaluated using the Electronic Portal Imaging Device (EPID) for the different banks, gantry positions, and collimator angles. Point dose measurements for 10 test plans were compared to dose predictions of two dose calculation model versions. RESULTS: From MPC data, the largest measured MLC positioning accuracy deviation was within 0.1 mm. The proximal MLC exhibited greater deviations compared to the distal MLC. The distal‐and‐proximal‐combination had reduced inter‐leaf and intra‐leaf transmission compared to delivery with distal‐only. The measured leaf transmission was 0.41% for distal‐only, 0.40% for proximal‐only, and negligible for distal‐and‐proximal‐combination. The leaf end penumbra was wider compared to the leaf edge penumbra. The leaf end effect was measured to be −0.2 mm. The leaf edge effect showed minimal bank, gantry position, and collimator angle dependence. However, a systematic deviation between measurements and treatment planning system handling of the leaf edge effect was observed. The discrepancy between the measured and predicted dose in the 10 test plans improved with the latest version of the dose calculation algorithm. CONCLUSION: The characteristics of the stacked and staggered dual‐layer MLC on the Halcyon(TM) system were presented. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-03-19 /pmc/articles/PMC6448159/ /pubmed/30889312 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12568 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Association of Physicists in Medicine. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Radiation Oncology Physics
Lim, Tze Yee
Dragojević, Irena
Hoffman, David
Flores‐Martinez, Everardo
Kim, Gwe‐Ya
Characterization of the Halcyon(TM) multileaf collimator system
title Characterization of the Halcyon(TM) multileaf collimator system
title_full Characterization of the Halcyon(TM) multileaf collimator system
title_fullStr Characterization of the Halcyon(TM) multileaf collimator system
title_full_unstemmed Characterization of the Halcyon(TM) multileaf collimator system
title_short Characterization of the Halcyon(TM) multileaf collimator system
title_sort characterization of the halcyon(tm) multileaf collimator system
topic Radiation Oncology Physics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6448159/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30889312
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12568
work_keys_str_mv AT limtzeyee characterizationofthehalcyontmmultileafcollimatorsystem
AT dragojevicirena characterizationofthehalcyontmmultileafcollimatorsystem
AT hoffmandavid characterizationofthehalcyontmmultileafcollimatorsystem
AT floresmartinezeverardo characterizationofthehalcyontmmultileafcollimatorsystem
AT kimgweya characterizationofthehalcyontmmultileafcollimatorsystem