Cargando…

Tattoo free setup for partial breast irradiation: A feasibility study

PURPOSE: Patients undergoing external beam accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) receive permanent tattoos to aid with daily setup alignment and verification. With the advent of three‐dimensional (3D) body surface imaging and two‐dimensional (2D) x‐ray imaging‐based matching to surgical clip...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jimenez, Rachel B., Batin, Estelle, Giantsoudi, Drosoula, Hazeltine, William, Bertolino, Kendell, Ho, Alice Y., MacDonald, Shannon M., Taghian, Alphonse G., Gierga, David P.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6448163/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30945803
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12557
_version_ 1783408642294284288
author Jimenez, Rachel B.
Batin, Estelle
Giantsoudi, Drosoula
Hazeltine, William
Bertolino, Kendell
Ho, Alice Y.
MacDonald, Shannon M.
Taghian, Alphonse G.
Gierga, David P.
author_facet Jimenez, Rachel B.
Batin, Estelle
Giantsoudi, Drosoula
Hazeltine, William
Bertolino, Kendell
Ho, Alice Y.
MacDonald, Shannon M.
Taghian, Alphonse G.
Gierga, David P.
author_sort Jimenez, Rachel B.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Patients undergoing external beam accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) receive permanent tattoos to aid with daily setup alignment and verification. With the advent of three‐dimensional (3D) body surface imaging and two‐dimensional (2D) x‐ray imaging‐based matching to surgical clips, tattoos may not be necessary to ensure setup accuracy. We compared the accuracy of conventional tattoo‐based setups to a patient setup without tattoos. MATERIALS/METHODS: Twenty consecutive patients receiving APBI at our institution from July 10, 2017 to February 13, 2018 were identified. All patients received tattoos per standard of care. Ten patients underwent setup using tattoos for initial positioning followed by surface imaging and 2D matching of surgical clips. The other ten patients underwent positioning using surface imaging followed by 2D matching without reference to tattoos. Overall setup time and orthogonal x‐ray‐based shifts after surface imaging per fraction were recorded. Shift data were used to calculate systematic and random error. RESULTS: Among ten patients in the “no tattoo” group, the average setup time per fraction was 6.83 min vs 8.03 min in the tattoo cohort (P < 0.01). Mean 3D vector shifts for patients in the “no tattoo” group were 4.6 vs 5.9 mm in the “tattoo” cohort (P = NS). Mean systematic errors in the “no tattoo” group were: 1.2 mm (1.5 mm SD) superior/inferior, 0.5 mm (1.6 mm SD) right/left, and 2.3 mm (1.9 mm SD) anterior/posterior directions. Mean systematic errors in the “tattoo” group were: 0.8 mm (2.2 mm SD) superior/inferior, 0.3 mm (2.5 mm SD) right/left, and 1.4 mm (4.4 mm SD) anterior/posterior directions. The random errors in the “no tattoo” group ranged from 0.6 to 0.7 mm vs 1.2 to 1.7 mm in the “tattoo” group. CONCLUSIONS: Using both surface imaging and 2D matching to surgical clips provides excellent accuracy in APBI patient alignment and setup verification with reduced setup time relative to the tattoo cohort. Skin‐based tattoos may no longer be warranted for patients receiving external beam APBI.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6448163
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64481632019-04-15 Tattoo free setup for partial breast irradiation: A feasibility study Jimenez, Rachel B. Batin, Estelle Giantsoudi, Drosoula Hazeltine, William Bertolino, Kendell Ho, Alice Y. MacDonald, Shannon M. Taghian, Alphonse G. Gierga, David P. J Appl Clin Med Phys Radiation Oncology Physics PURPOSE: Patients undergoing external beam accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) receive permanent tattoos to aid with daily setup alignment and verification. With the advent of three‐dimensional (3D) body surface imaging and two‐dimensional (2D) x‐ray imaging‐based matching to surgical clips, tattoos may not be necessary to ensure setup accuracy. We compared the accuracy of conventional tattoo‐based setups to a patient setup without tattoos. MATERIALS/METHODS: Twenty consecutive patients receiving APBI at our institution from July 10, 2017 to February 13, 2018 were identified. All patients received tattoos per standard of care. Ten patients underwent setup using tattoos for initial positioning followed by surface imaging and 2D matching of surgical clips. The other ten patients underwent positioning using surface imaging followed by 2D matching without reference to tattoos. Overall setup time and orthogonal x‐ray‐based shifts after surface imaging per fraction were recorded. Shift data were used to calculate systematic and random error. RESULTS: Among ten patients in the “no tattoo” group, the average setup time per fraction was 6.83 min vs 8.03 min in the tattoo cohort (P < 0.01). Mean 3D vector shifts for patients in the “no tattoo” group were 4.6 vs 5.9 mm in the “tattoo” cohort (P = NS). Mean systematic errors in the “no tattoo” group were: 1.2 mm (1.5 mm SD) superior/inferior, 0.5 mm (1.6 mm SD) right/left, and 2.3 mm (1.9 mm SD) anterior/posterior directions. Mean systematic errors in the “tattoo” group were: 0.8 mm (2.2 mm SD) superior/inferior, 0.3 mm (2.5 mm SD) right/left, and 1.4 mm (4.4 mm SD) anterior/posterior directions. The random errors in the “no tattoo” group ranged from 0.6 to 0.7 mm vs 1.2 to 1.7 mm in the “tattoo” group. CONCLUSIONS: Using both surface imaging and 2D matching to surgical clips provides excellent accuracy in APBI patient alignment and setup verification with reduced setup time relative to the tattoo cohort. Skin‐based tattoos may no longer be warranted for patients receiving external beam APBI. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-04-04 /pmc/articles/PMC6448163/ /pubmed/30945803 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12557 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Association of Physicists in Medicine This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Radiation Oncology Physics
Jimenez, Rachel B.
Batin, Estelle
Giantsoudi, Drosoula
Hazeltine, William
Bertolino, Kendell
Ho, Alice Y.
MacDonald, Shannon M.
Taghian, Alphonse G.
Gierga, David P.
Tattoo free setup for partial breast irradiation: A feasibility study
title Tattoo free setup for partial breast irradiation: A feasibility study
title_full Tattoo free setup for partial breast irradiation: A feasibility study
title_fullStr Tattoo free setup for partial breast irradiation: A feasibility study
title_full_unstemmed Tattoo free setup for partial breast irradiation: A feasibility study
title_short Tattoo free setup for partial breast irradiation: A feasibility study
title_sort tattoo free setup for partial breast irradiation: a feasibility study
topic Radiation Oncology Physics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6448163/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30945803
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12557
work_keys_str_mv AT jimenezrachelb tattoofreesetupforpartialbreastirradiationafeasibilitystudy
AT batinestelle tattoofreesetupforpartialbreastirradiationafeasibilitystudy
AT giantsoudidrosoula tattoofreesetupforpartialbreastirradiationafeasibilitystudy
AT hazeltinewilliam tattoofreesetupforpartialbreastirradiationafeasibilitystudy
AT bertolinokendell tattoofreesetupforpartialbreastirradiationafeasibilitystudy
AT hoalicey tattoofreesetupforpartialbreastirradiationafeasibilitystudy
AT macdonaldshannonm tattoofreesetupforpartialbreastirradiationafeasibilitystudy
AT taghianalphonseg tattoofreesetupforpartialbreastirradiationafeasibilitystudy
AT giergadavidp tattoofreesetupforpartialbreastirradiationafeasibilitystudy