Cargando…
Sensitivity of dose‐volume indices to computation settings in high‐dose‐rate prostate brachytherapy treatment plan evaluation
PURPOSE: To investigate the variation in computed dose‐volume (DV) indices for high‐dose‐rate (HDR) prostate brachytherapy that can result from typical differences in computation settings in treatment planning systems (TPSs). METHODS: Five factors were taken into account: number of dose‐calculation...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6448172/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30882986 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12563 |
_version_ | 1783408644227858432 |
---|---|
author | van der Meer, Marjolein C. Bosman, Peter A. N. Pieters, Bradley R. Niatsetski, Yury van Wieringen, Niek Alderliesten, Tanja Bel, Arjan |
author_facet | van der Meer, Marjolein C. Bosman, Peter A. N. Pieters, Bradley R. Niatsetski, Yury van Wieringen, Niek Alderliesten, Tanja Bel, Arjan |
author_sort | van der Meer, Marjolein C. |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: To investigate the variation in computed dose‐volume (DV) indices for high‐dose‐rate (HDR) prostate brachytherapy that can result from typical differences in computation settings in treatment planning systems (TPSs). METHODS: Five factors were taken into account: number of dose‐calculation points, radioactive source description, interpolation between delineated contours, intersections between delineated organ contours, and organ shape at the top and bottom contour using either full or partial slice thickness. Using in‐house developed software, the DV indices of the treatment plans of 26 patients were calculated with different settings, and compared to a baseline setting that closely followed the default settings of the TPS used in our medical center. Studied organs were prostate and seminal vesicles, denoted as targets, and bladder, rectum, and urethra, denoted as organs at risk (OARs), which were delineated on MRI scans with a 3.3 mm slice thickness. RESULTS: When sampling a fixed number of points in each organ, in order to achieve a width of the 95% confidence interval over all patients of the DV indices of 1% or less, only 32,000 points had to be sampled per target, but 256,000 points had to be sampled per OAR. For the remaining factors, DV indices changed up to 0.4% for rectum, 1.3% for urethra, and 2.6% for prostate. DV indices of the bladder changed especially if the high‐dose‐region was (partly) located at the most caudal contour, up to 8.5%, and DV indices of the vesicles changed especially if there were few delineated contours, up to 9.8%, both due to the use of full slice thickness for the top and bottom contour. CONCLUSIONS: The values of DV indices used in prostate HDR brachytherapy treatment planning are influenced by the computation settings in a TPS, especially at the most caudal part of the bladder, as well as in the seminal vesicles. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6448172 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-64481722019-04-15 Sensitivity of dose‐volume indices to computation settings in high‐dose‐rate prostate brachytherapy treatment plan evaluation van der Meer, Marjolein C. Bosman, Peter A. N. Pieters, Bradley R. Niatsetski, Yury van Wieringen, Niek Alderliesten, Tanja Bel, Arjan J Appl Clin Med Phys Radiation Oncology Physics PURPOSE: To investigate the variation in computed dose‐volume (DV) indices for high‐dose‐rate (HDR) prostate brachytherapy that can result from typical differences in computation settings in treatment planning systems (TPSs). METHODS: Five factors were taken into account: number of dose‐calculation points, radioactive source description, interpolation between delineated contours, intersections between delineated organ contours, and organ shape at the top and bottom contour using either full or partial slice thickness. Using in‐house developed software, the DV indices of the treatment plans of 26 patients were calculated with different settings, and compared to a baseline setting that closely followed the default settings of the TPS used in our medical center. Studied organs were prostate and seminal vesicles, denoted as targets, and bladder, rectum, and urethra, denoted as organs at risk (OARs), which were delineated on MRI scans with a 3.3 mm slice thickness. RESULTS: When sampling a fixed number of points in each organ, in order to achieve a width of the 95% confidence interval over all patients of the DV indices of 1% or less, only 32,000 points had to be sampled per target, but 256,000 points had to be sampled per OAR. For the remaining factors, DV indices changed up to 0.4% for rectum, 1.3% for urethra, and 2.6% for prostate. DV indices of the bladder changed especially if the high‐dose‐region was (partly) located at the most caudal contour, up to 8.5%, and DV indices of the vesicles changed especially if there were few delineated contours, up to 9.8%, both due to the use of full slice thickness for the top and bottom contour. CONCLUSIONS: The values of DV indices used in prostate HDR brachytherapy treatment planning are influenced by the computation settings in a TPS, especially at the most caudal part of the bladder, as well as in the seminal vesicles. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-03-18 /pmc/articles/PMC6448172/ /pubmed/30882986 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12563 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Association of Physicists in Medicine This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Radiation Oncology Physics van der Meer, Marjolein C. Bosman, Peter A. N. Pieters, Bradley R. Niatsetski, Yury van Wieringen, Niek Alderliesten, Tanja Bel, Arjan Sensitivity of dose‐volume indices to computation settings in high‐dose‐rate prostate brachytherapy treatment plan evaluation |
title | Sensitivity of dose‐volume indices to computation settings in high‐dose‐rate prostate brachytherapy treatment plan evaluation |
title_full | Sensitivity of dose‐volume indices to computation settings in high‐dose‐rate prostate brachytherapy treatment plan evaluation |
title_fullStr | Sensitivity of dose‐volume indices to computation settings in high‐dose‐rate prostate brachytherapy treatment plan evaluation |
title_full_unstemmed | Sensitivity of dose‐volume indices to computation settings in high‐dose‐rate prostate brachytherapy treatment plan evaluation |
title_short | Sensitivity of dose‐volume indices to computation settings in high‐dose‐rate prostate brachytherapy treatment plan evaluation |
title_sort | sensitivity of dose‐volume indices to computation settings in high‐dose‐rate prostate brachytherapy treatment plan evaluation |
topic | Radiation Oncology Physics |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6448172/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30882986 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12563 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vandermeermarjoleinc sensitivityofdosevolumeindicestocomputationsettingsinhighdoserateprostatebrachytherapytreatmentplanevaluation AT bosmanpeteran sensitivityofdosevolumeindicestocomputationsettingsinhighdoserateprostatebrachytherapytreatmentplanevaluation AT pietersbradleyr sensitivityofdosevolumeindicestocomputationsettingsinhighdoserateprostatebrachytherapytreatmentplanevaluation AT niatsetskiyury sensitivityofdosevolumeindicestocomputationsettingsinhighdoserateprostatebrachytherapytreatmentplanevaluation AT vanwieringenniek sensitivityofdosevolumeindicestocomputationsettingsinhighdoserateprostatebrachytherapytreatmentplanevaluation AT alderliestentanja sensitivityofdosevolumeindicestocomputationsettingsinhighdoserateprostatebrachytherapytreatmentplanevaluation AT belarjan sensitivityofdosevolumeindicestocomputationsettingsinhighdoserateprostatebrachytherapytreatmentplanevaluation |