Cargando…

Discovering associations between problem list and practice setting

BACKGROUND: The Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health Act (HITECH) has greatly accelerated the adoption of electronic health records (EHRs) with the promise of better clinical decisions and patients’ outcomes. One of the core criteria for “Meaningful Use” of EHRs is to have...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wang, Liwei, Wang, Yanshan, Shen, Feichen, Rastegar-Mojarad, Majid, Liu, Hongfang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6448189/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30943957
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12911-019-0779-y
_version_ 1783408648322547712
author Wang, Liwei
Wang, Yanshan
Shen, Feichen
Rastegar-Mojarad, Majid
Liu, Hongfang
author_facet Wang, Liwei
Wang, Yanshan
Shen, Feichen
Rastegar-Mojarad, Majid
Liu, Hongfang
author_sort Wang, Liwei
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health Act (HITECH) has greatly accelerated the adoption of electronic health records (EHRs) with the promise of better clinical decisions and patients’ outcomes. One of the core criteria for “Meaningful Use” of EHRs is to have a problem list that shows the most important health problems faced by a patient. The implementation of problem lists in EHRs has a potential to help practitioners to provide customized care to patients. However, it remains an open question on how to leverage problem lists in different practice settings to provide tailored care, of which the bottleneck lies in the associations between problem list and practice setting. METHODS: In this study, using sampled clinical documents associated with a cohort of patients who received their primary care at Mayo Clinic, we investigated the associations between problem list and practice setting through natural language processing (NLP) and topic modeling techniques. Specifically, after practice settings and problem lists were normalized, statistical χ(2) test, term frequency-inverse document frequency (TF-IDF) and enrichment analysis were used to choose representative concepts for each setting. Then Latent Dirichlet Allocations (LDA) were used to train topic models and predict potential practice settings using similarity metrics based on the problem concepts representative of practice settings. Evaluation was conducted through 5-fold cross validation and Recall@k, Precision@k and F1@k were calculated. RESULTS: Our method can generate prioritized and meaningful problem lists corresponding to specific practice settings. For practice setting prediction, recall increases from 0.719 (k = 2) to 0.931 (k = 10), precision increases from 0.882 (k = 2) to 0.931 (k = 10) and F1 increases from 0.790 (k = 2) to 0.931 (k = 10). CONCLUSION: To our best knowledge, our study is the first attempting to discover the association between the problem lists and hospital practice settings. In the future, we plan to investigate how to provide more tailored care by utilizing the association between problem list and practice setting revealed in this study. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12911-019-0779-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6448189
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64481892019-04-15 Discovering associations between problem list and practice setting Wang, Liwei Wang, Yanshan Shen, Feichen Rastegar-Mojarad, Majid Liu, Hongfang BMC Med Inform Decis Mak Research BACKGROUND: The Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health Act (HITECH) has greatly accelerated the adoption of electronic health records (EHRs) with the promise of better clinical decisions and patients’ outcomes. One of the core criteria for “Meaningful Use” of EHRs is to have a problem list that shows the most important health problems faced by a patient. The implementation of problem lists in EHRs has a potential to help practitioners to provide customized care to patients. However, it remains an open question on how to leverage problem lists in different practice settings to provide tailored care, of which the bottleneck lies in the associations between problem list and practice setting. METHODS: In this study, using sampled clinical documents associated with a cohort of patients who received their primary care at Mayo Clinic, we investigated the associations between problem list and practice setting through natural language processing (NLP) and topic modeling techniques. Specifically, after practice settings and problem lists were normalized, statistical χ(2) test, term frequency-inverse document frequency (TF-IDF) and enrichment analysis were used to choose representative concepts for each setting. Then Latent Dirichlet Allocations (LDA) were used to train topic models and predict potential practice settings using similarity metrics based on the problem concepts representative of practice settings. Evaluation was conducted through 5-fold cross validation and Recall@k, Precision@k and F1@k were calculated. RESULTS: Our method can generate prioritized and meaningful problem lists corresponding to specific practice settings. For practice setting prediction, recall increases from 0.719 (k = 2) to 0.931 (k = 10), precision increases from 0.882 (k = 2) to 0.931 (k = 10) and F1 increases from 0.790 (k = 2) to 0.931 (k = 10). CONCLUSION: To our best knowledge, our study is the first attempting to discover the association between the problem lists and hospital practice settings. In the future, we plan to investigate how to provide more tailored care by utilizing the association between problem list and practice setting revealed in this study. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12911-019-0779-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2019-04-04 /pmc/articles/PMC6448189/ /pubmed/30943957 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12911-019-0779-y Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Wang, Liwei
Wang, Yanshan
Shen, Feichen
Rastegar-Mojarad, Majid
Liu, Hongfang
Discovering associations between problem list and practice setting
title Discovering associations between problem list and practice setting
title_full Discovering associations between problem list and practice setting
title_fullStr Discovering associations between problem list and practice setting
title_full_unstemmed Discovering associations between problem list and practice setting
title_short Discovering associations between problem list and practice setting
title_sort discovering associations between problem list and practice setting
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6448189/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30943957
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12911-019-0779-y
work_keys_str_mv AT wangliwei discoveringassociationsbetweenproblemlistandpracticesetting
AT wangyanshan discoveringassociationsbetweenproblemlistandpracticesetting
AT shenfeichen discoveringassociationsbetweenproblemlistandpracticesetting
AT rastegarmojaradmajid discoveringassociationsbetweenproblemlistandpracticesetting
AT liuhongfang discoveringassociationsbetweenproblemlistandpracticesetting