Cargando…

Can Liposomal Bupivacaine Be Safely Utilized in Elective Spine Surgery?

STUDY DESIGN: Single-blinded prospective randomized control trial. OBJECTIVES: To compare the incidence of adverse events (AEs) and hospital length of stay between patients who received liposomal bupivacaine (LB) versus a single saline injection, following posterior lumbar decompression and fusion s...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Brown, Luke, Weir, Tristan, Koenig, Scott, Shasti, Mark, Yousaf, Imran, Yousaf, Omer, Tannous, Oliver, Koh, Eugene, Banagan, Kelley, Gelb, Daniel, Ludwig, Steven
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6448202/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30984490
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2192568218755684
_version_ 1783408651421089792
author Brown, Luke
Weir, Tristan
Koenig, Scott
Shasti, Mark
Yousaf, Imran
Yousaf, Omer
Tannous, Oliver
Koh, Eugene
Banagan, Kelley
Gelb, Daniel
Ludwig, Steven
author_facet Brown, Luke
Weir, Tristan
Koenig, Scott
Shasti, Mark
Yousaf, Imran
Yousaf, Omer
Tannous, Oliver
Koh, Eugene
Banagan, Kelley
Gelb, Daniel
Ludwig, Steven
author_sort Brown, Luke
collection PubMed
description STUDY DESIGN: Single-blinded prospective randomized control trial. OBJECTIVES: To compare the incidence of adverse events (AEs) and hospital length of stay between patients who received liposomal bupivacaine (LB) versus a single saline injection, following posterior lumbar decompression and fusion surgery for degenerative spondylosis. METHODS: From 2015 to 2016, 59 patients undergoing posterior lumbar decompression and fusion surgery were prospectively enrolled and randomized to receive either 60 mL injection of 266 mg LB or 60 mL of 0.9% sterile saline, intraoperatively. Outcome measures included the incidence of postoperative AEs and hospital length of stay. RESULTS: The most common AEs in the treatment group were nausea (39.3%), emesis (18.1%), and hypotension (18.1%). Nausea (23%), constipation (19.2%), and urinary retention (15.3%) were most common in the control group. Patients who received LB had an increased risk of developing nausea (relative risk [RR] = 1.7; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.75-3.8), emesis (RR = 2.3; 95% CI = 0.51-10.7), and headaches (RR = 2.36; 95% CI = 0.26-21.4). Patients receiving LB had a decreased risk of developing constipation (RR = 0.78; 95% CI = 0.25-2.43), urinary retention (RR = 0.78; 95% CI = 0.21-2.85), and pruritus (RR = 0.78; 95% = 0.21-2.8) postoperatively. Relative risk values mentioned above failed to reach statistical significance. No significant difference in the hospital length of stay between both groups was found (3.9 vs 3.9 days; P = .92). CONCLUSION: Single-dose injections of LB to the surgical site prior to wound closure did not significantly increase or decrease the incidence or risk of developing AEs postoperatively. Furthermore, no significant difference was found in the hospital length of stay between both groups.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6448202
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64482022019-04-12 Can Liposomal Bupivacaine Be Safely Utilized in Elective Spine Surgery? Brown, Luke Weir, Tristan Koenig, Scott Shasti, Mark Yousaf, Imran Yousaf, Omer Tannous, Oliver Koh, Eugene Banagan, Kelley Gelb, Daniel Ludwig, Steven Global Spine J Original Articles STUDY DESIGN: Single-blinded prospective randomized control trial. OBJECTIVES: To compare the incidence of adverse events (AEs) and hospital length of stay between patients who received liposomal bupivacaine (LB) versus a single saline injection, following posterior lumbar decompression and fusion surgery for degenerative spondylosis. METHODS: From 2015 to 2016, 59 patients undergoing posterior lumbar decompression and fusion surgery were prospectively enrolled and randomized to receive either 60 mL injection of 266 mg LB or 60 mL of 0.9% sterile saline, intraoperatively. Outcome measures included the incidence of postoperative AEs and hospital length of stay. RESULTS: The most common AEs in the treatment group were nausea (39.3%), emesis (18.1%), and hypotension (18.1%). Nausea (23%), constipation (19.2%), and urinary retention (15.3%) were most common in the control group. Patients who received LB had an increased risk of developing nausea (relative risk [RR] = 1.7; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.75-3.8), emesis (RR = 2.3; 95% CI = 0.51-10.7), and headaches (RR = 2.36; 95% CI = 0.26-21.4). Patients receiving LB had a decreased risk of developing constipation (RR = 0.78; 95% CI = 0.25-2.43), urinary retention (RR = 0.78; 95% CI = 0.21-2.85), and pruritus (RR = 0.78; 95% = 0.21-2.8) postoperatively. Relative risk values mentioned above failed to reach statistical significance. No significant difference in the hospital length of stay between both groups was found (3.9 vs 3.9 days; P = .92). CONCLUSION: Single-dose injections of LB to the surgical site prior to wound closure did not significantly increase or decrease the incidence or risk of developing AEs postoperatively. Furthermore, no significant difference was found in the hospital length of stay between both groups. SAGE Publications 2018-07-31 2019-04 /pmc/articles/PMC6448202/ /pubmed/30984490 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2192568218755684 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work as published without adaptation or alteration, without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Original Articles
Brown, Luke
Weir, Tristan
Koenig, Scott
Shasti, Mark
Yousaf, Imran
Yousaf, Omer
Tannous, Oliver
Koh, Eugene
Banagan, Kelley
Gelb, Daniel
Ludwig, Steven
Can Liposomal Bupivacaine Be Safely Utilized in Elective Spine Surgery?
title Can Liposomal Bupivacaine Be Safely Utilized in Elective Spine Surgery?
title_full Can Liposomal Bupivacaine Be Safely Utilized in Elective Spine Surgery?
title_fullStr Can Liposomal Bupivacaine Be Safely Utilized in Elective Spine Surgery?
title_full_unstemmed Can Liposomal Bupivacaine Be Safely Utilized in Elective Spine Surgery?
title_short Can Liposomal Bupivacaine Be Safely Utilized in Elective Spine Surgery?
title_sort can liposomal bupivacaine be safely utilized in elective spine surgery?
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6448202/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30984490
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2192568218755684
work_keys_str_mv AT brownluke canliposomalbupivacainebesafelyutilizedinelectivespinesurgery
AT weirtristan canliposomalbupivacainebesafelyutilizedinelectivespinesurgery
AT koenigscott canliposomalbupivacainebesafelyutilizedinelectivespinesurgery
AT shastimark canliposomalbupivacainebesafelyutilizedinelectivespinesurgery
AT yousafimran canliposomalbupivacainebesafelyutilizedinelectivespinesurgery
AT yousafomer canliposomalbupivacainebesafelyutilizedinelectivespinesurgery
AT tannousoliver canliposomalbupivacainebesafelyutilizedinelectivespinesurgery
AT koheugene canliposomalbupivacainebesafelyutilizedinelectivespinesurgery
AT banagankelley canliposomalbupivacainebesafelyutilizedinelectivespinesurgery
AT gelbdaniel canliposomalbupivacainebesafelyutilizedinelectivespinesurgery
AT ludwigsteven canliposomalbupivacainebesafelyutilizedinelectivespinesurgery