Cargando…
Can Liposomal Bupivacaine Be Safely Utilized in Elective Spine Surgery?
STUDY DESIGN: Single-blinded prospective randomized control trial. OBJECTIVES: To compare the incidence of adverse events (AEs) and hospital length of stay between patients who received liposomal bupivacaine (LB) versus a single saline injection, following posterior lumbar decompression and fusion s...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6448202/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30984490 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2192568218755684 |
_version_ | 1783408651421089792 |
---|---|
author | Brown, Luke Weir, Tristan Koenig, Scott Shasti, Mark Yousaf, Imran Yousaf, Omer Tannous, Oliver Koh, Eugene Banagan, Kelley Gelb, Daniel Ludwig, Steven |
author_facet | Brown, Luke Weir, Tristan Koenig, Scott Shasti, Mark Yousaf, Imran Yousaf, Omer Tannous, Oliver Koh, Eugene Banagan, Kelley Gelb, Daniel Ludwig, Steven |
author_sort | Brown, Luke |
collection | PubMed |
description | STUDY DESIGN: Single-blinded prospective randomized control trial. OBJECTIVES: To compare the incidence of adverse events (AEs) and hospital length of stay between patients who received liposomal bupivacaine (LB) versus a single saline injection, following posterior lumbar decompression and fusion surgery for degenerative spondylosis. METHODS: From 2015 to 2016, 59 patients undergoing posterior lumbar decompression and fusion surgery were prospectively enrolled and randomized to receive either 60 mL injection of 266 mg LB or 60 mL of 0.9% sterile saline, intraoperatively. Outcome measures included the incidence of postoperative AEs and hospital length of stay. RESULTS: The most common AEs in the treatment group were nausea (39.3%), emesis (18.1%), and hypotension (18.1%). Nausea (23%), constipation (19.2%), and urinary retention (15.3%) were most common in the control group. Patients who received LB had an increased risk of developing nausea (relative risk [RR] = 1.7; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.75-3.8), emesis (RR = 2.3; 95% CI = 0.51-10.7), and headaches (RR = 2.36; 95% CI = 0.26-21.4). Patients receiving LB had a decreased risk of developing constipation (RR = 0.78; 95% CI = 0.25-2.43), urinary retention (RR = 0.78; 95% CI = 0.21-2.85), and pruritus (RR = 0.78; 95% = 0.21-2.8) postoperatively. Relative risk values mentioned above failed to reach statistical significance. No significant difference in the hospital length of stay between both groups was found (3.9 vs 3.9 days; P = .92). CONCLUSION: Single-dose injections of LB to the surgical site prior to wound closure did not significantly increase or decrease the incidence or risk of developing AEs postoperatively. Furthermore, no significant difference was found in the hospital length of stay between both groups. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6448202 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-64482022019-04-12 Can Liposomal Bupivacaine Be Safely Utilized in Elective Spine Surgery? Brown, Luke Weir, Tristan Koenig, Scott Shasti, Mark Yousaf, Imran Yousaf, Omer Tannous, Oliver Koh, Eugene Banagan, Kelley Gelb, Daniel Ludwig, Steven Global Spine J Original Articles STUDY DESIGN: Single-blinded prospective randomized control trial. OBJECTIVES: To compare the incidence of adverse events (AEs) and hospital length of stay between patients who received liposomal bupivacaine (LB) versus a single saline injection, following posterior lumbar decompression and fusion surgery for degenerative spondylosis. METHODS: From 2015 to 2016, 59 patients undergoing posterior lumbar decompression and fusion surgery were prospectively enrolled and randomized to receive either 60 mL injection of 266 mg LB or 60 mL of 0.9% sterile saline, intraoperatively. Outcome measures included the incidence of postoperative AEs and hospital length of stay. RESULTS: The most common AEs in the treatment group were nausea (39.3%), emesis (18.1%), and hypotension (18.1%). Nausea (23%), constipation (19.2%), and urinary retention (15.3%) were most common in the control group. Patients who received LB had an increased risk of developing nausea (relative risk [RR] = 1.7; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.75-3.8), emesis (RR = 2.3; 95% CI = 0.51-10.7), and headaches (RR = 2.36; 95% CI = 0.26-21.4). Patients receiving LB had a decreased risk of developing constipation (RR = 0.78; 95% CI = 0.25-2.43), urinary retention (RR = 0.78; 95% CI = 0.21-2.85), and pruritus (RR = 0.78; 95% = 0.21-2.8) postoperatively. Relative risk values mentioned above failed to reach statistical significance. No significant difference in the hospital length of stay between both groups was found (3.9 vs 3.9 days; P = .92). CONCLUSION: Single-dose injections of LB to the surgical site prior to wound closure did not significantly increase or decrease the incidence or risk of developing AEs postoperatively. Furthermore, no significant difference was found in the hospital length of stay between both groups. SAGE Publications 2018-07-31 2019-04 /pmc/articles/PMC6448202/ /pubmed/30984490 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2192568218755684 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work as published without adaptation or alteration, without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Brown, Luke Weir, Tristan Koenig, Scott Shasti, Mark Yousaf, Imran Yousaf, Omer Tannous, Oliver Koh, Eugene Banagan, Kelley Gelb, Daniel Ludwig, Steven Can Liposomal Bupivacaine Be Safely Utilized in Elective Spine Surgery? |
title | Can Liposomal Bupivacaine Be Safely Utilized in Elective Spine
Surgery? |
title_full | Can Liposomal Bupivacaine Be Safely Utilized in Elective Spine
Surgery? |
title_fullStr | Can Liposomal Bupivacaine Be Safely Utilized in Elective Spine
Surgery? |
title_full_unstemmed | Can Liposomal Bupivacaine Be Safely Utilized in Elective Spine
Surgery? |
title_short | Can Liposomal Bupivacaine Be Safely Utilized in Elective Spine
Surgery? |
title_sort | can liposomal bupivacaine be safely utilized in elective spine
surgery? |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6448202/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30984490 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2192568218755684 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT brownluke canliposomalbupivacainebesafelyutilizedinelectivespinesurgery AT weirtristan canliposomalbupivacainebesafelyutilizedinelectivespinesurgery AT koenigscott canliposomalbupivacainebesafelyutilizedinelectivespinesurgery AT shastimark canliposomalbupivacainebesafelyutilizedinelectivespinesurgery AT yousafimran canliposomalbupivacainebesafelyutilizedinelectivespinesurgery AT yousafomer canliposomalbupivacainebesafelyutilizedinelectivespinesurgery AT tannousoliver canliposomalbupivacainebesafelyutilizedinelectivespinesurgery AT koheugene canliposomalbupivacainebesafelyutilizedinelectivespinesurgery AT banagankelley canliposomalbupivacainebesafelyutilizedinelectivespinesurgery AT gelbdaniel canliposomalbupivacainebesafelyutilizedinelectivespinesurgery AT ludwigsteven canliposomalbupivacainebesafelyutilizedinelectivespinesurgery |