Cargando…

Women’s circles as a culturally safe psychosocial intervention in Guatemalan indigenous communities: a community-led pilot randomised trial

BACKGROUND: Indigenous Maya women in Guatemala show some of the worst maternal health indicators worldwide. Our objective was to test acceptability, feasibility and impact of a co-designed group psychosocial intervention (Women’s Circles) in a population with significant need but no access to mental...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chomat, Anne Marie, Menchú, Aura Isabel, Andersson, Neil, Ramirez-Zea, Manuel, Pedersen, Duncan, Bleile, Alexandra, Letona, Paola, Araya, Ricardo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6448212/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30943958
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12905-019-0744-z
_version_ 1783408653800308736
author Chomat, Anne Marie
Menchú, Aura Isabel
Andersson, Neil
Ramirez-Zea, Manuel
Pedersen, Duncan
Bleile, Alexandra
Letona, Paola
Araya, Ricardo
author_facet Chomat, Anne Marie
Menchú, Aura Isabel
Andersson, Neil
Ramirez-Zea, Manuel
Pedersen, Duncan
Bleile, Alexandra
Letona, Paola
Araya, Ricardo
author_sort Chomat, Anne Marie
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Indigenous Maya women in Guatemala show some of the worst maternal health indicators worldwide. Our objective was to test acceptability, feasibility and impact of a co-designed group psychosocial intervention (Women’s Circles) in a population with significant need but no access to mental health services. METHODS: A parallel group pilot randomised study was undertaken in five rural Mam and three periurban K’iche’ communities. Participants included 84 women (12 per community, in seven of the communities) randomly allocated to intervention and 71 to control groups; all were pregnant and/or within 2 years postpartum. The intervention consisted of 10 sessions co-designed with and facilitated by 16 circle leaders. Main outcome measures were: maternal psychosocial distress (HSCL-25), wellbeing (MHC-SF), self-efficacy and engagement in early infant stimulation activities. In-depth interviews also assessed acceptability and feasibility. RESULTS: The intervention proved feasible and well accepted by circle leaders and participating women. 1-month post-intervention, wellbeing scores (p-value 0.008) and self-care self-efficacy (0.049) scores were higher among intervention compared to control women. Those women who attended more sessions had higher wellbeing (0.007), self-care and infant-care self-efficacy (0.014 and 0.043, respectively), and early infant stimulation (0.019) scores. CONCLUSIONS: The pilot demonstrated acceptability, feasibility and potential efficacy to justify a future definitive randomised controlled trial. Co-designed women’s groups provide a safe space where indigenous women can collectively improve their functioning and wellbeing. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN13964819. Registered 26 June 2018, retrospectively registered. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12905-019-0744-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6448212
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64482122019-04-15 Women’s circles as a culturally safe psychosocial intervention in Guatemalan indigenous communities: a community-led pilot randomised trial Chomat, Anne Marie Menchú, Aura Isabel Andersson, Neil Ramirez-Zea, Manuel Pedersen, Duncan Bleile, Alexandra Letona, Paola Araya, Ricardo BMC Womens Health Research Article BACKGROUND: Indigenous Maya women in Guatemala show some of the worst maternal health indicators worldwide. Our objective was to test acceptability, feasibility and impact of a co-designed group psychosocial intervention (Women’s Circles) in a population with significant need but no access to mental health services. METHODS: A parallel group pilot randomised study was undertaken in five rural Mam and three periurban K’iche’ communities. Participants included 84 women (12 per community, in seven of the communities) randomly allocated to intervention and 71 to control groups; all were pregnant and/or within 2 years postpartum. The intervention consisted of 10 sessions co-designed with and facilitated by 16 circle leaders. Main outcome measures were: maternal psychosocial distress (HSCL-25), wellbeing (MHC-SF), self-efficacy and engagement in early infant stimulation activities. In-depth interviews also assessed acceptability and feasibility. RESULTS: The intervention proved feasible and well accepted by circle leaders and participating women. 1-month post-intervention, wellbeing scores (p-value 0.008) and self-care self-efficacy (0.049) scores were higher among intervention compared to control women. Those women who attended more sessions had higher wellbeing (0.007), self-care and infant-care self-efficacy (0.014 and 0.043, respectively), and early infant stimulation (0.019) scores. CONCLUSIONS: The pilot demonstrated acceptability, feasibility and potential efficacy to justify a future definitive randomised controlled trial. Co-designed women’s groups provide a safe space where indigenous women can collectively improve their functioning and wellbeing. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN13964819. Registered 26 June 2018, retrospectively registered. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12905-019-0744-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2019-04-03 /pmc/articles/PMC6448212/ /pubmed/30943958 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12905-019-0744-z Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Chomat, Anne Marie
Menchú, Aura Isabel
Andersson, Neil
Ramirez-Zea, Manuel
Pedersen, Duncan
Bleile, Alexandra
Letona, Paola
Araya, Ricardo
Women’s circles as a culturally safe psychosocial intervention in Guatemalan indigenous communities: a community-led pilot randomised trial
title Women’s circles as a culturally safe psychosocial intervention in Guatemalan indigenous communities: a community-led pilot randomised trial
title_full Women’s circles as a culturally safe psychosocial intervention in Guatemalan indigenous communities: a community-led pilot randomised trial
title_fullStr Women’s circles as a culturally safe psychosocial intervention in Guatemalan indigenous communities: a community-led pilot randomised trial
title_full_unstemmed Women’s circles as a culturally safe psychosocial intervention in Guatemalan indigenous communities: a community-led pilot randomised trial
title_short Women’s circles as a culturally safe psychosocial intervention in Guatemalan indigenous communities: a community-led pilot randomised trial
title_sort women’s circles as a culturally safe psychosocial intervention in guatemalan indigenous communities: a community-led pilot randomised trial
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6448212/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30943958
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12905-019-0744-z
work_keys_str_mv AT chomatannemarie womenscirclesasaculturallysafepsychosocialinterventioninguatemalanindigenouscommunitiesacommunityledpilotrandomisedtrial
AT menchuauraisabel womenscirclesasaculturallysafepsychosocialinterventioninguatemalanindigenouscommunitiesacommunityledpilotrandomisedtrial
AT anderssonneil womenscirclesasaculturallysafepsychosocialinterventioninguatemalanindigenouscommunitiesacommunityledpilotrandomisedtrial
AT ramirezzeamanuel womenscirclesasaculturallysafepsychosocialinterventioninguatemalanindigenouscommunitiesacommunityledpilotrandomisedtrial
AT pedersenduncan womenscirclesasaculturallysafepsychosocialinterventioninguatemalanindigenouscommunitiesacommunityledpilotrandomisedtrial
AT bleilealexandra womenscirclesasaculturallysafepsychosocialinterventioninguatemalanindigenouscommunitiesacommunityledpilotrandomisedtrial
AT letonapaola womenscirclesasaculturallysafepsychosocialinterventioninguatemalanindigenouscommunitiesacommunityledpilotrandomisedtrial
AT arayaricardo womenscirclesasaculturallysafepsychosocialinterventioninguatemalanindigenouscommunitiesacommunityledpilotrandomisedtrial