Cargando…

The development of an intervention for diabetes prevention among people with impaired glucose regulation: feasibility and acceptability of an intervention component

BACKGROUND: As part of the design process of a low-cost minimal-contact diabetes prevention intervention, we issued a blood glucose meter to people with impaired glucose regulation (who are at high risk of type 2 diabetes). We conducted a feasibility study to assess the acceptability of this interve...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Evans, Josie M. M., Irvine, Linda, Connelly, Jenni, Cameron, Dawn M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6448252/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30988958
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40814-019-0435-4
_version_ 1783408663678943232
author Evans, Josie M. M.
Irvine, Linda
Connelly, Jenni
Cameron, Dawn M.
author_facet Evans, Josie M. M.
Irvine, Linda
Connelly, Jenni
Cameron, Dawn M.
author_sort Evans, Josie M. M.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: As part of the design process of a low-cost minimal-contact diabetes prevention intervention, we issued a blood glucose meter to people with impaired glucose regulation (who are at high risk of type 2 diabetes). We conducted a feasibility study to assess the acceptability of this intervention component and whether and how recipients engaged with it. METHODS: A blood glucose meter was given to 19 people identified through primary care, who were asked to use the meter in an exploratory way during a 4-week trial period, to try to understand the effect of different foods on the body. They were advised that they could test as often or as little as they liked and were also asked to keep a food/exercise diary for at least 1 week. They were interviewed about their experiences afterwards. RESULTS: There was a high level of engagement with testing, with the total number of tests recorded ranging from 11 to 114 (median 74) among 18 participants. Fifteen participants tested almost every day during the 4-week period. The cognitive engagement was more limited. All participants commented on their own results, and most were able to relate high or low results to foods eaten and exercise taken, usually in response to prompting. However, there was limited thought or understanding beyond this in terms of longer-term patterns of diet and exercise, and testing was routine rather than experimental. Some participants were confused by conflicting or unexpected results. A few minor problems were reported by participants, such as soreness, inconvenience, and difficulty in getting blood, but never enough to discontinue testing. Several participants stated that the meter was a useful aid as a reminder that they were at high risk of diabetes and served as a prompt that needed to make and/or maintain behaviour changes. CONCLUSIONS: The study suggests that blood glucose monitoring is acceptable to people with impaired glucose regulation and that they would engage with it as part of an intervention to improve their diet. The study has also uncovered potential mechanisms of action for behaviour change.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6448252
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64482522019-04-15 The development of an intervention for diabetes prevention among people with impaired glucose regulation: feasibility and acceptability of an intervention component Evans, Josie M. M. Irvine, Linda Connelly, Jenni Cameron, Dawn M. Pilot Feasibility Stud Research BACKGROUND: As part of the design process of a low-cost minimal-contact diabetes prevention intervention, we issued a blood glucose meter to people with impaired glucose regulation (who are at high risk of type 2 diabetes). We conducted a feasibility study to assess the acceptability of this intervention component and whether and how recipients engaged with it. METHODS: A blood glucose meter was given to 19 people identified through primary care, who were asked to use the meter in an exploratory way during a 4-week trial period, to try to understand the effect of different foods on the body. They were advised that they could test as often or as little as they liked and were also asked to keep a food/exercise diary for at least 1 week. They were interviewed about their experiences afterwards. RESULTS: There was a high level of engagement with testing, with the total number of tests recorded ranging from 11 to 114 (median 74) among 18 participants. Fifteen participants tested almost every day during the 4-week period. The cognitive engagement was more limited. All participants commented on their own results, and most were able to relate high or low results to foods eaten and exercise taken, usually in response to prompting. However, there was limited thought or understanding beyond this in terms of longer-term patterns of diet and exercise, and testing was routine rather than experimental. Some participants were confused by conflicting or unexpected results. A few minor problems were reported by participants, such as soreness, inconvenience, and difficulty in getting blood, but never enough to discontinue testing. Several participants stated that the meter was a useful aid as a reminder that they were at high risk of diabetes and served as a prompt that needed to make and/or maintain behaviour changes. CONCLUSIONS: The study suggests that blood glucose monitoring is acceptable to people with impaired glucose regulation and that they would engage with it as part of an intervention to improve their diet. The study has also uncovered potential mechanisms of action for behaviour change. BioMed Central 2019-04-04 /pmc/articles/PMC6448252/ /pubmed/30988958 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40814-019-0435-4 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Evans, Josie M. M.
Irvine, Linda
Connelly, Jenni
Cameron, Dawn M.
The development of an intervention for diabetes prevention among people with impaired glucose regulation: feasibility and acceptability of an intervention component
title The development of an intervention for diabetes prevention among people with impaired glucose regulation: feasibility and acceptability of an intervention component
title_full The development of an intervention for diabetes prevention among people with impaired glucose regulation: feasibility and acceptability of an intervention component
title_fullStr The development of an intervention for diabetes prevention among people with impaired glucose regulation: feasibility and acceptability of an intervention component
title_full_unstemmed The development of an intervention for diabetes prevention among people with impaired glucose regulation: feasibility and acceptability of an intervention component
title_short The development of an intervention for diabetes prevention among people with impaired glucose regulation: feasibility and acceptability of an intervention component
title_sort development of an intervention for diabetes prevention among people with impaired glucose regulation: feasibility and acceptability of an intervention component
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6448252/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30988958
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40814-019-0435-4
work_keys_str_mv AT evansjosiemm thedevelopmentofaninterventionfordiabetespreventionamongpeoplewithimpairedglucoseregulationfeasibilityandacceptabilityofaninterventioncomponent
AT irvinelinda thedevelopmentofaninterventionfordiabetespreventionamongpeoplewithimpairedglucoseregulationfeasibilityandacceptabilityofaninterventioncomponent
AT connellyjenni thedevelopmentofaninterventionfordiabetespreventionamongpeoplewithimpairedglucoseregulationfeasibilityandacceptabilityofaninterventioncomponent
AT camerondawnm thedevelopmentofaninterventionfordiabetespreventionamongpeoplewithimpairedglucoseregulationfeasibilityandacceptabilityofaninterventioncomponent
AT evansjosiemm developmentofaninterventionfordiabetespreventionamongpeoplewithimpairedglucoseregulationfeasibilityandacceptabilityofaninterventioncomponent
AT irvinelinda developmentofaninterventionfordiabetespreventionamongpeoplewithimpairedglucoseregulationfeasibilityandacceptabilityofaninterventioncomponent
AT connellyjenni developmentofaninterventionfordiabetespreventionamongpeoplewithimpairedglucoseregulationfeasibilityandacceptabilityofaninterventioncomponent
AT camerondawnm developmentofaninterventionfordiabetespreventionamongpeoplewithimpairedglucoseregulationfeasibilityandacceptabilityofaninterventioncomponent