Cargando…

Assessment of interventions to attract and retain health workers in rural Zambia: a discrete choice experiment

BACKGROUND: Workforce shortages, particularly in rural areas, limit the delivery of health services in Zambia. Policymakers and researchers co-created this study to identify potential non-monetary employment incentives and assess their cost-effectiveness to attract and retain public sector health wo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Prust, Margaret L., Kamanga, Aniset, Ngosa, Lupenshyo, McKay, Courtney, Muzongwe, Chilweza Musonda, Mukubani, Mazuba Tamara, Chihinga, Roy, Misapa, Ronald, van den Broek, Jan Willem, Wilmink, Nikhil
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6448309/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30943995
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12960-019-0359-3
_version_ 1783408676295409664
author Prust, Margaret L.
Kamanga, Aniset
Ngosa, Lupenshyo
McKay, Courtney
Muzongwe, Chilweza Musonda
Mukubani, Mazuba Tamara
Chihinga, Roy
Misapa, Ronald
van den Broek, Jan Willem
Wilmink, Nikhil
author_facet Prust, Margaret L.
Kamanga, Aniset
Ngosa, Lupenshyo
McKay, Courtney
Muzongwe, Chilweza Musonda
Mukubani, Mazuba Tamara
Chihinga, Roy
Misapa, Ronald
van den Broek, Jan Willem
Wilmink, Nikhil
author_sort Prust, Margaret L.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Workforce shortages, particularly in rural areas, limit the delivery of health services in Zambia. Policymakers and researchers co-created this study to identify potential non-monetary employment incentives and assess their cost-effectiveness to attract and retain public sector health workers to the rural areas of Zambia. METHODS: The study consisted of two key phases: a discrete choice experiment (DCE), preceded by a qualitative component to inform DCE questionnaire development. Firstly, in qualitative interviews with 25 health workers and focus group discussions (FGDs) with 253 health students, participants were asked to discuss job attributes and potential incentives that would influence their job choices. Based on this exercise and in consultation with policymakers, job attributes were selected for inclusion in a discrete choice experiment (DCE) questionnaire. Secondly, this questionnaire, consisting of hypothetical job “choice sets,” was presented to 474 practicing health workers and students. A conditional logit regression model was applied to the data from this DCE questionnaire to estimate preferences for various job attributes. Using administrative data, we estimated the cost of implementing potential attraction and retention strategies per health worker year worked. RESULTS: Although health workers preferred urban jobs to rural jobs (OR 1.39, 95% CI 1.11–1.75), employment incentives influenced health workers’ decision to choose rural jobs. If superior housing was offered in a rural area compared to a basic housing allowance in an urban job, participants would be five times as likely to choose the rural job (OR 5.04, 95% CI 4.12–6.18). Education incentives and facility-based improvements also increased the likelihood of rural job uptake. Housing benefits were estimated to have the lowest total costs per health worker year worked, and offer high value in terms of cost per percentage point increase in rural job uptake. CONCLUSIONS: Non-monetary incentives such as housing, education, and facility improvements can be important motivators of health worker choice of location and could mitigate rural health workforce shortages. These results can provide valuable insight into the types of job attributes and incentives that are most likely to be effective in attracting and retaining health workers in rural areas. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12960-019-0359-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6448309
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64483092019-04-15 Assessment of interventions to attract and retain health workers in rural Zambia: a discrete choice experiment Prust, Margaret L. Kamanga, Aniset Ngosa, Lupenshyo McKay, Courtney Muzongwe, Chilweza Musonda Mukubani, Mazuba Tamara Chihinga, Roy Misapa, Ronald van den Broek, Jan Willem Wilmink, Nikhil Hum Resour Health Research BACKGROUND: Workforce shortages, particularly in rural areas, limit the delivery of health services in Zambia. Policymakers and researchers co-created this study to identify potential non-monetary employment incentives and assess their cost-effectiveness to attract and retain public sector health workers to the rural areas of Zambia. METHODS: The study consisted of two key phases: a discrete choice experiment (DCE), preceded by a qualitative component to inform DCE questionnaire development. Firstly, in qualitative interviews with 25 health workers and focus group discussions (FGDs) with 253 health students, participants were asked to discuss job attributes and potential incentives that would influence their job choices. Based on this exercise and in consultation with policymakers, job attributes were selected for inclusion in a discrete choice experiment (DCE) questionnaire. Secondly, this questionnaire, consisting of hypothetical job “choice sets,” was presented to 474 practicing health workers and students. A conditional logit regression model was applied to the data from this DCE questionnaire to estimate preferences for various job attributes. Using administrative data, we estimated the cost of implementing potential attraction and retention strategies per health worker year worked. RESULTS: Although health workers preferred urban jobs to rural jobs (OR 1.39, 95% CI 1.11–1.75), employment incentives influenced health workers’ decision to choose rural jobs. If superior housing was offered in a rural area compared to a basic housing allowance in an urban job, participants would be five times as likely to choose the rural job (OR 5.04, 95% CI 4.12–6.18). Education incentives and facility-based improvements also increased the likelihood of rural job uptake. Housing benefits were estimated to have the lowest total costs per health worker year worked, and offer high value in terms of cost per percentage point increase in rural job uptake. CONCLUSIONS: Non-monetary incentives such as housing, education, and facility improvements can be important motivators of health worker choice of location and could mitigate rural health workforce shortages. These results can provide valuable insight into the types of job attributes and incentives that are most likely to be effective in attracting and retaining health workers in rural areas. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12960-019-0359-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2019-04-03 /pmc/articles/PMC6448309/ /pubmed/30943995 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12960-019-0359-3 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Prust, Margaret L.
Kamanga, Aniset
Ngosa, Lupenshyo
McKay, Courtney
Muzongwe, Chilweza Musonda
Mukubani, Mazuba Tamara
Chihinga, Roy
Misapa, Ronald
van den Broek, Jan Willem
Wilmink, Nikhil
Assessment of interventions to attract and retain health workers in rural Zambia: a discrete choice experiment
title Assessment of interventions to attract and retain health workers in rural Zambia: a discrete choice experiment
title_full Assessment of interventions to attract and retain health workers in rural Zambia: a discrete choice experiment
title_fullStr Assessment of interventions to attract and retain health workers in rural Zambia: a discrete choice experiment
title_full_unstemmed Assessment of interventions to attract and retain health workers in rural Zambia: a discrete choice experiment
title_short Assessment of interventions to attract and retain health workers in rural Zambia: a discrete choice experiment
title_sort assessment of interventions to attract and retain health workers in rural zambia: a discrete choice experiment
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6448309/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30943995
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12960-019-0359-3
work_keys_str_mv AT prustmargaretl assessmentofinterventionstoattractandretainhealthworkersinruralzambiaadiscretechoiceexperiment
AT kamangaaniset assessmentofinterventionstoattractandretainhealthworkersinruralzambiaadiscretechoiceexperiment
AT ngosalupenshyo assessmentofinterventionstoattractandretainhealthworkersinruralzambiaadiscretechoiceexperiment
AT mckaycourtney assessmentofinterventionstoattractandretainhealthworkersinruralzambiaadiscretechoiceexperiment
AT muzongwechilwezamusonda assessmentofinterventionstoattractandretainhealthworkersinruralzambiaadiscretechoiceexperiment
AT mukubanimazubatamara assessmentofinterventionstoattractandretainhealthworkersinruralzambiaadiscretechoiceexperiment
AT chihingaroy assessmentofinterventionstoattractandretainhealthworkersinruralzambiaadiscretechoiceexperiment
AT misaparonald assessmentofinterventionstoattractandretainhealthworkersinruralzambiaadiscretechoiceexperiment
AT vandenbroekjanwillem assessmentofinterventionstoattractandretainhealthworkersinruralzambiaadiscretechoiceexperiment
AT wilminknikhil assessmentofinterventionstoattractandretainhealthworkersinruralzambiaadiscretechoiceexperiment