Cargando…

Honest advocacy for nature: presenting a persuasive narrative for conservation

Conservation scientists are increasingly recognising the value of communicating policy-relevant knowledge to policy-makers. Whilst considerable progress has been made in offering practical advice for scientists seeking to engage more closely with decision-makers, researchers have provided few tangib...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rose, David C., Brotherton, Peter N. M., Owens, Susan, Pryke, Thomas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Netherlands 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6448358/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31007418
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10531-016-1163-1
_version_ 1783408687956623360
author Rose, David C.
Brotherton, Peter N. M.
Owens, Susan
Pryke, Thomas
author_facet Rose, David C.
Brotherton, Peter N. M.
Owens, Susan
Pryke, Thomas
author_sort Rose, David C.
collection PubMed
description Conservation scientists are increasingly recognising the value of communicating policy-relevant knowledge to policy-makers. Whilst considerable progress has been made in offering practical advice for scientists seeking to engage more closely with decision-makers, researchers have provided few tangible examples to learn from. This paper uses an English case study, but draws out important high-level messages relevant to conservation scientists worldwide. The case study looks at how the Lawton Review presented knowledge persuasively about the suitability of England’s ecological network to deal with future pressures. Through skilful framing of rigorous scientific knowledge it was able to make a significant impact on government policy. Impact was achieved through: (1) selecting politically salient frames through which to communicate; (2) using clear, accessible language, and; (3) conducting rigorous science using an authoritative team of experts. Although its publication coincided with a favourable policy window, the Lawton Review seized on this opportunity to communicate a rigorously argued, persuasive and practical conservation message; in other words, it performed ‘honest advocacy’. Thus, whilst it remains important to conduct scientific research with technical rigour, conservation scientists could also benefit from identifying salient frames for conservation and communicating clearly.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6448358
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Springer Netherlands
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64483582019-04-17 Honest advocacy for nature: presenting a persuasive narrative for conservation Rose, David C. Brotherton, Peter N. M. Owens, Susan Pryke, Thomas Biodivers Conserv Original Paper Conservation scientists are increasingly recognising the value of communicating policy-relevant knowledge to policy-makers. Whilst considerable progress has been made in offering practical advice for scientists seeking to engage more closely with decision-makers, researchers have provided few tangible examples to learn from. This paper uses an English case study, but draws out important high-level messages relevant to conservation scientists worldwide. The case study looks at how the Lawton Review presented knowledge persuasively about the suitability of England’s ecological network to deal with future pressures. Through skilful framing of rigorous scientific knowledge it was able to make a significant impact on government policy. Impact was achieved through: (1) selecting politically salient frames through which to communicate; (2) using clear, accessible language, and; (3) conducting rigorous science using an authoritative team of experts. Although its publication coincided with a favourable policy window, the Lawton Review seized on this opportunity to communicate a rigorously argued, persuasive and practical conservation message; in other words, it performed ‘honest advocacy’. Thus, whilst it remains important to conduct scientific research with technical rigour, conservation scientists could also benefit from identifying salient frames for conservation and communicating clearly. Springer Netherlands 2016-06-30 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC6448358/ /pubmed/31007418 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10531-016-1163-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Rose, David C.
Brotherton, Peter N. M.
Owens, Susan
Pryke, Thomas
Honest advocacy for nature: presenting a persuasive narrative for conservation
title Honest advocacy for nature: presenting a persuasive narrative for conservation
title_full Honest advocacy for nature: presenting a persuasive narrative for conservation
title_fullStr Honest advocacy for nature: presenting a persuasive narrative for conservation
title_full_unstemmed Honest advocacy for nature: presenting a persuasive narrative for conservation
title_short Honest advocacy for nature: presenting a persuasive narrative for conservation
title_sort honest advocacy for nature: presenting a persuasive narrative for conservation
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6448358/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31007418
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10531-016-1163-1
work_keys_str_mv AT rosedavidc honestadvocacyfornaturepresentingapersuasivenarrativeforconservation
AT brothertonpeternm honestadvocacyfornaturepresentingapersuasivenarrativeforconservation
AT owenssusan honestadvocacyfornaturepresentingapersuasivenarrativeforconservation
AT prykethomas honestadvocacyfornaturepresentingapersuasivenarrativeforconservation