Cargando…

Understanding and forecasting phreatic eruptions driven by magmatic degassing

This paper examines phreatic eruptions which are driven by inputs of magma and magmatic gas. We synthesize data from several significant phreatic systems, including two in Costa Rica (Turrialba and Poás) which are currently highly active and hazardous. We define two endmember types of phreatic erupt...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Stix, John, de Moor, J. Maarten
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6448360/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31007532
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40623-018-0855-z
_version_ 1783408688430579712
author Stix, John
de Moor, J. Maarten
author_facet Stix, John
de Moor, J. Maarten
author_sort Stix, John
collection PubMed
description This paper examines phreatic eruptions which are driven by inputs of magma and magmatic gas. We synthesize data from several significant phreatic systems, including two in Costa Rica (Turrialba and Poás) which are currently highly active and hazardous. We define two endmember types of phreatic eruptions, the first (type 1) in which a deeper hydrothermal system fed by magmatic gases is sealed and produces overpressure sufficient to drive explosive eruptions, and the second (type 2) where magmatic gases are supplied via open-vent degassing to a near-surface hydrothermal system, vaporizing liquid water which drives the phreatic eruptions. The surficial source of type 2 eruptions is characteristic, while the source depth of type 1 eruptions is commonly greater. Hence, type 1 eruptions tend to be more energetic than type 2 eruptions. The first type of eruption we term “phreato-vulcanian”, and the second we term “phreato-surtseyan”. Some systems (e.g., Ruapehu, Poás) can produce both type 1 and type 2 eruptions, and all systems can undergo sealing at various timescales. We examine a number of precursory signals which appear to be important in understanding and forecasting phreatic eruptions; these include very long period events, banded tremor, and gas ratios, in particular H(2)S/SO(2) and CO(2)/SO(2). We propose that if these datasets are carefully integrated during a monitoring program, it may be possible to accurately forecast phreatic eruptions. [Image: see text]
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6448360
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64483602019-04-17 Understanding and forecasting phreatic eruptions driven by magmatic degassing Stix, John de Moor, J. Maarten Earth Planets Space Frontier Letter This paper examines phreatic eruptions which are driven by inputs of magma and magmatic gas. We synthesize data from several significant phreatic systems, including two in Costa Rica (Turrialba and Poás) which are currently highly active and hazardous. We define two endmember types of phreatic eruptions, the first (type 1) in which a deeper hydrothermal system fed by magmatic gases is sealed and produces overpressure sufficient to drive explosive eruptions, and the second (type 2) where magmatic gases are supplied via open-vent degassing to a near-surface hydrothermal system, vaporizing liquid water which drives the phreatic eruptions. The surficial source of type 2 eruptions is characteristic, while the source depth of type 1 eruptions is commonly greater. Hence, type 1 eruptions tend to be more energetic than type 2 eruptions. The first type of eruption we term “phreato-vulcanian”, and the second we term “phreato-surtseyan”. Some systems (e.g., Ruapehu, Poás) can produce both type 1 and type 2 eruptions, and all systems can undergo sealing at various timescales. We examine a number of precursory signals which appear to be important in understanding and forecasting phreatic eruptions; these include very long period events, banded tremor, and gas ratios, in particular H(2)S/SO(2) and CO(2)/SO(2). We propose that if these datasets are carefully integrated during a monitoring program, it may be possible to accurately forecast phreatic eruptions. [Image: see text] Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2018-05-18 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC6448360/ /pubmed/31007532 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40623-018-0855-z Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Frontier Letter
Stix, John
de Moor, J. Maarten
Understanding and forecasting phreatic eruptions driven by magmatic degassing
title Understanding and forecasting phreatic eruptions driven by magmatic degassing
title_full Understanding and forecasting phreatic eruptions driven by magmatic degassing
title_fullStr Understanding and forecasting phreatic eruptions driven by magmatic degassing
title_full_unstemmed Understanding and forecasting phreatic eruptions driven by magmatic degassing
title_short Understanding and forecasting phreatic eruptions driven by magmatic degassing
title_sort understanding and forecasting phreatic eruptions driven by magmatic degassing
topic Frontier Letter
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6448360/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31007532
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40623-018-0855-z
work_keys_str_mv AT stixjohn understandingandforecastingphreaticeruptionsdrivenbymagmaticdegassing
AT demoorjmaarten understandingandforecastingphreaticeruptionsdrivenbymagmaticdegassing