Cargando…

Microemulsions vs chitosan derivative-coated microemulsions for dermal delivery of 8-methoxypsoralen

BACKGROUND: 8-methoxypsoralen (8-MOP) is one of the most commonly utilized drugs in psoralen-ultraviolet A therapy for treatment of vitiligo. However, poor skin retention and systemic side effects limit the clinical application of 8-MOP. METHODS: Microemulsions (MEs) and chitosan derivative-coated 8...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wu, Jun-Yong, Li, Yong-Jiang, Liu, Ting-Ting, Ou, Ge, Hu, Xiong-Bin, Tang, Tian-Tian, Wang, Jie-Min, Liu, Xin-Yi, Xiang, Da-Xiong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6448538/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31015760
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/IJN.S191940
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: 8-methoxypsoralen (8-MOP) is one of the most commonly utilized drugs in psoralen-ultraviolet A therapy for treatment of vitiligo. However, poor skin retention and systemic side effects limit the clinical application of 8-MOP. METHODS: Microemulsions (MEs) and chitosan derivative-coated 8-MOP MEs were developed and compared for dermal delivery of 8-MOP. Ex vivo skin retention/permeation study was performed to select the ME formulation with the highest retention:permeation ratio. Four different chitosan-coated MEs were prepared and compared with the ME formulation for their ability to distribute 8-MOP in the skin. RESULTS: Among various ME formulations developed, a formulation containing 2.9% ethyl oleate, 17.2% Cromophor EL35, 8.6% ethanol and 71.3% water showed the highest ex vivo skin retention:permeation ratio (1.98). Of four chitosan-coated MEs prepared, carboxymethyl chitosan-coated MEs (CC-MEs) and hydroxypropyl chitosan-coated MEs (HC-MEs) showed higher ex vivo skin retention:permeation ratio (1.46 and 1.84). and were selected for in vivo pharmacokinetic study. AUC(skin) (0–12 h) for 8-MOP MEs (4578.56 h·ng·mL(−1)) was higher than HC-MEs (3422.47 h·ng·mL(−1)), CC-MEs (2808.51 h·ng·mL(−1)) and tincture (1500.16 h·ng·mL(−1)). Also, AUCplasma (0–12 h) for MEs (39.35±13.90 h·ng·mL(−1)) was significantly lower than HC-MEs (66.32 h·ng·mL(−1)), CC-MEs (59.70 h·ng·mL(−1)) and tincture (73.02 h·ng·mL(−1)). CONCLUSION: These combined results suggested that the MEs developed could be a promising and safe alternative for targeted skin delivery of 8-MOP.