Cargando…
Variations in Cochlear Size of Cochlear Implant Candidates
Introduction The cochlear anatomy varies in each individual, and that has an impact on decisions regarding the insertion of electrodes. The measurement of the cochlear size is the routine examination required to choose the proper cochlear implant (CI) electrodes. Objective To acquire normative dat...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Thieme Revinter Publicações Ltda
2019
|
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6449142/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30956703 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0038-1661360 |
_version_ | 1783408792191369216 |
---|---|
author | Zahara, Devira Dewi, Rima Diana Aboet, Askaroellah Putranto, Fikri Mirza Lubis, Netty Delvrita Ashar, Taufik |
author_facet | Zahara, Devira Dewi, Rima Diana Aboet, Askaroellah Putranto, Fikri Mirza Lubis, Netty Delvrita Ashar, Taufik |
author_sort | Zahara, Devira |
collection | PubMed |
description | Introduction The cochlear anatomy varies in each individual, and that has an impact on decisions regarding the insertion of electrodes. The measurement of the cochlear size is the routine examination required to choose the proper cochlear implant (CI) electrodes. Objective To acquire normative data on the size of the cochlea (length, width, height, scala timpani [ST] height, cochlear duct length [CDL]) of CI candidates in Medan, Indonesia. Methods This descriptive study was conducted based on high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) temporal bone data and on HRCT temporal data manipulated to reconstruct three-dimensional (3D) multiplanar images with OsiriX MD DICOM Viewer version 9.5.1 (Pixmeo SARL, Bernex, Geneva, Switzerland) viewer of 18 patients (36 ears) who were CI candidates in Medan, Indonesia, in order to determine cochlear length (A), cochlear width, cochlear height, ST height and CDL, calculated through a simple mathematical function. Results The average cochlear length (A) was 8.75 mm (standard deviation [SD] = 0.31 mm); the average cochlear width was 6.53 mm (SD = 0.35 mm); the average cochlear height was 3.26 mm (SD = 0.24 mm) and the average ST height at the basal cochlea was 1.00 mm (SD = 0.1 mm); and 0.71 mm (SD = 0.1 mm) at the half turn of cochlea. The average total CDL was 32.45 mm (SD = 1.31 mm; range: 30.01–34.83 mm). Conclusion The cochlear size varies in each individual; therefore, the temporal bone measurement of CI candidates using HRCT is essential: for the selection of suitable implant electrodes; to minimize cochlear damages at the insertion of the electrode arrays; and to maximize the hearing improvements. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6449142 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Thieme Revinter Publicações Ltda |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-64491422019-04-05 Variations in Cochlear Size of Cochlear Implant Candidates Zahara, Devira Dewi, Rima Diana Aboet, Askaroellah Putranto, Fikri Mirza Lubis, Netty Delvrita Ashar, Taufik Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol Introduction The cochlear anatomy varies in each individual, and that has an impact on decisions regarding the insertion of electrodes. The measurement of the cochlear size is the routine examination required to choose the proper cochlear implant (CI) electrodes. Objective To acquire normative data on the size of the cochlea (length, width, height, scala timpani [ST] height, cochlear duct length [CDL]) of CI candidates in Medan, Indonesia. Methods This descriptive study was conducted based on high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) temporal bone data and on HRCT temporal data manipulated to reconstruct three-dimensional (3D) multiplanar images with OsiriX MD DICOM Viewer version 9.5.1 (Pixmeo SARL, Bernex, Geneva, Switzerland) viewer of 18 patients (36 ears) who were CI candidates in Medan, Indonesia, in order to determine cochlear length (A), cochlear width, cochlear height, ST height and CDL, calculated through a simple mathematical function. Results The average cochlear length (A) was 8.75 mm (standard deviation [SD] = 0.31 mm); the average cochlear width was 6.53 mm (SD = 0.35 mm); the average cochlear height was 3.26 mm (SD = 0.24 mm) and the average ST height at the basal cochlea was 1.00 mm (SD = 0.1 mm); and 0.71 mm (SD = 0.1 mm) at the half turn of cochlea. The average total CDL was 32.45 mm (SD = 1.31 mm; range: 30.01–34.83 mm). Conclusion The cochlear size varies in each individual; therefore, the temporal bone measurement of CI candidates using HRCT is essential: for the selection of suitable implant electrodes; to minimize cochlear damages at the insertion of the electrode arrays; and to maximize the hearing improvements. Thieme Revinter Publicações Ltda 2019-04 2018-10-24 /pmc/articles/PMC6449142/ /pubmed/30956703 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0038-1661360 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License, which permits unrestricted reproduction and distribution, for non-commercial purposes only; and use and reproduction, but not distribution, of adapted material for non-commercial purposes only, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Zahara, Devira Dewi, Rima Diana Aboet, Askaroellah Putranto, Fikri Mirza Lubis, Netty Delvrita Ashar, Taufik Variations in Cochlear Size of Cochlear Implant Candidates |
title | Variations in Cochlear Size of Cochlear Implant Candidates |
title_full | Variations in Cochlear Size of Cochlear Implant Candidates |
title_fullStr | Variations in Cochlear Size of Cochlear Implant Candidates |
title_full_unstemmed | Variations in Cochlear Size of Cochlear Implant Candidates |
title_short | Variations in Cochlear Size of Cochlear Implant Candidates |
title_sort | variations in cochlear size of cochlear implant candidates |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6449142/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30956703 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0038-1661360 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zaharadevira variationsincochlearsizeofcochlearimplantcandidates AT dewirimadiana variationsincochlearsizeofcochlearimplantcandidates AT aboetaskaroellah variationsincochlearsizeofcochlearimplantcandidates AT putrantofikrimirza variationsincochlearsizeofcochlearimplantcandidates AT lubisnettydelvrita variationsincochlearsizeofcochlearimplantcandidates AT ashartaufik variationsincochlearsizeofcochlearimplantcandidates |