Cargando…

Is video‐assisted thoracoscopy a sufficient approach for mediastinal lymph node dissection to treat lung cancer after neoadjuvant therapy?

BACKGROUND: The role of video‐assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) in mediastinal lymph node dissection (MLND) for non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) following neoadjuvant therapy remains controversial. The aim of this study was to demonstrate the sufficiency of VATS by evaluating perioperative and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tian, Zhoujunyi, Sui, Xizhao, Yang, Fan, Wang, Jun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6449226/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30756507
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1759-7714.12999
_version_ 1783408797305274368
author Tian, Zhoujunyi
Sui, Xizhao
Yang, Fan
Wang, Jun
author_facet Tian, Zhoujunyi
Sui, Xizhao
Yang, Fan
Wang, Jun
author_sort Tian, Zhoujunyi
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The role of video‐assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) in mediastinal lymph node dissection (MLND) for non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) following neoadjuvant therapy remains controversial. The aim of this study was to demonstrate the sufficiency of VATS by evaluating perioperative and long‐term outcomes. METHODS: Patients with locally advanced NSCLC and treated with radical surgery after neoadjuvant therapy were identified in our database. The thoroughness of MLND was compared by approach. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to evaluate predictors of sufficient MLND. Propensity score matching was performed. Kaplan–Meier and Cox proportional hazard analyses were used to assess long‐term survival. RESULTS: Of the 127 enrolled patients, 56 underwent attempted VATS and 71 underwent thoracotomy. Multivariable logistic regression analysis revealed that approach was not a predictor of sufficient MLND (odds ratio 0.81, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.364–1.803; P = 0.606). After matching, 28 pairs of patients were selected from the two groups. There was no significant difference between the numbers of dissected lymph nodes (15 vs. 20; P = 0.191) and nodal stations (7 vs. 7; P = 0.315). Recurrence‐free (log‐rank P = 0.613) and overall survival (log‐rank P = 0.379) was similar in both groups. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards model analysis indicated that VATS was not an independent predictor of recurrence‐free (hazard ratio 0.955, 95% CI 0.415–2.198; P = 0.913) or overall survival (hazard ratio 0.841, 95% CI 0.338–2.093; P = 0.709). CONCLUSION: Compared to thoracotomy, VATS is a sufficient approach for MLND to treat locally advanced NSCLC following neoadjuvant therapy without compromising long‐term survival.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6449226
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64492262019-04-15 Is video‐assisted thoracoscopy a sufficient approach for mediastinal lymph node dissection to treat lung cancer after neoadjuvant therapy? Tian, Zhoujunyi Sui, Xizhao Yang, Fan Wang, Jun Thorac Cancer Original Articles BACKGROUND: The role of video‐assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) in mediastinal lymph node dissection (MLND) for non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) following neoadjuvant therapy remains controversial. The aim of this study was to demonstrate the sufficiency of VATS by evaluating perioperative and long‐term outcomes. METHODS: Patients with locally advanced NSCLC and treated with radical surgery after neoadjuvant therapy were identified in our database. The thoroughness of MLND was compared by approach. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to evaluate predictors of sufficient MLND. Propensity score matching was performed. Kaplan–Meier and Cox proportional hazard analyses were used to assess long‐term survival. RESULTS: Of the 127 enrolled patients, 56 underwent attempted VATS and 71 underwent thoracotomy. Multivariable logistic regression analysis revealed that approach was not a predictor of sufficient MLND (odds ratio 0.81, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.364–1.803; P = 0.606). After matching, 28 pairs of patients were selected from the two groups. There was no significant difference between the numbers of dissected lymph nodes (15 vs. 20; P = 0.191) and nodal stations (7 vs. 7; P = 0.315). Recurrence‐free (log‐rank P = 0.613) and overall survival (log‐rank P = 0.379) was similar in both groups. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards model analysis indicated that VATS was not an independent predictor of recurrence‐free (hazard ratio 0.955, 95% CI 0.415–2.198; P = 0.913) or overall survival (hazard ratio 0.841, 95% CI 0.338–2.093; P = 0.709). CONCLUSION: Compared to thoracotomy, VATS is a sufficient approach for MLND to treat locally advanced NSCLC following neoadjuvant therapy without compromising long‐term survival. John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd 2019-02-12 2019-04 /pmc/articles/PMC6449226/ /pubmed/30756507 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1759-7714.12999 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Thoracic Cancer published by China Lung Oncology Group and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Tian, Zhoujunyi
Sui, Xizhao
Yang, Fan
Wang, Jun
Is video‐assisted thoracoscopy a sufficient approach for mediastinal lymph node dissection to treat lung cancer after neoadjuvant therapy?
title Is video‐assisted thoracoscopy a sufficient approach for mediastinal lymph node dissection to treat lung cancer after neoadjuvant therapy?
title_full Is video‐assisted thoracoscopy a sufficient approach for mediastinal lymph node dissection to treat lung cancer after neoadjuvant therapy?
title_fullStr Is video‐assisted thoracoscopy a sufficient approach for mediastinal lymph node dissection to treat lung cancer after neoadjuvant therapy?
title_full_unstemmed Is video‐assisted thoracoscopy a sufficient approach for mediastinal lymph node dissection to treat lung cancer after neoadjuvant therapy?
title_short Is video‐assisted thoracoscopy a sufficient approach for mediastinal lymph node dissection to treat lung cancer after neoadjuvant therapy?
title_sort is video‐assisted thoracoscopy a sufficient approach for mediastinal lymph node dissection to treat lung cancer after neoadjuvant therapy?
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6449226/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30756507
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1759-7714.12999
work_keys_str_mv AT tianzhoujunyi isvideoassistedthoracoscopyasufficientapproachformediastinallymphnodedissectiontotreatlungcancerafterneoadjuvanttherapy
AT suixizhao isvideoassistedthoracoscopyasufficientapproachformediastinallymphnodedissectiontotreatlungcancerafterneoadjuvanttherapy
AT yangfan isvideoassistedthoracoscopyasufficientapproachformediastinallymphnodedissectiontotreatlungcancerafterneoadjuvanttherapy
AT wangjun isvideoassistedthoracoscopyasufficientapproachformediastinallymphnodedissectiontotreatlungcancerafterneoadjuvanttherapy