Cargando…
Clinical significance of primary prophylactic pegylated‐granulocyte‐colony stimulating factor after the administration of ramucirumab plus docetaxel in patients with previously treated non‐small cell lung cancer
Whether primary prophylactic pegylated‐granulocyte‐colony stimulating factor (PEG‐G‐CSF) should be administered immediately after the initiation of ramucirumab plus docetaxel (DR) to prevent the occurrence of febrile neutropenia (FN) is unclear. Our retrospective study aimed to elucidate whether PEG...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6449259/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30859745 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1759-7714.13022 |
_version_ | 1783408804683055104 |
---|---|
author | Mouri, Atsuto Kaira, Kyoichi Shiono, Ayako Yamaguchi, Ou Murayama, Yoshitake Kobayashi, Kunihiko Kagamu, Hiroshi |
author_facet | Mouri, Atsuto Kaira, Kyoichi Shiono, Ayako Yamaguchi, Ou Murayama, Yoshitake Kobayashi, Kunihiko Kagamu, Hiroshi |
author_sort | Mouri, Atsuto |
collection | PubMed |
description | Whether primary prophylactic pegylated‐granulocyte‐colony stimulating factor (PEG‐G‐CSF) should be administered immediately after the initiation of ramucirumab plus docetaxel (DR) to prevent the occurrence of febrile neutropenia (FN) is unclear. Our retrospective study aimed to elucidate whether PEG‐G‐CSF could control the occurrence of FN as a result of DR in patients with previously treated non‐small‐cell lung cancer. Thirty‐three patients with previously treated non‐small‐cell lung cancer who had received DR were eligible for our analysis. Of the 33 patients, 29 received prophylactic PEG‐G‐CSF immediately after DR, but none developed FN. However, FN was observed in 2 (50%) of the 4 patients that were not administered PEG‐CSF. The overall response and disease control rates in the 29 patients with prophylactic PEG‐GSF were 31% and 62%, respectively. The median progression‐free and overall survival rates of the patients with and without prophylactic PEG‐GSF were 177 and 163 days (P = 0.20), and 628 and 274 days (P = 0.13), respectively. Primary prophylactic PEG‐G‐CSF suppressed the occurrence of FN secondary to the administration of DR. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6449259 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-64492592019-04-15 Clinical significance of primary prophylactic pegylated‐granulocyte‐colony stimulating factor after the administration of ramucirumab plus docetaxel in patients with previously treated non‐small cell lung cancer Mouri, Atsuto Kaira, Kyoichi Shiono, Ayako Yamaguchi, Ou Murayama, Yoshitake Kobayashi, Kunihiko Kagamu, Hiroshi Thorac Cancer Brief Reports Whether primary prophylactic pegylated‐granulocyte‐colony stimulating factor (PEG‐G‐CSF) should be administered immediately after the initiation of ramucirumab plus docetaxel (DR) to prevent the occurrence of febrile neutropenia (FN) is unclear. Our retrospective study aimed to elucidate whether PEG‐G‐CSF could control the occurrence of FN as a result of DR in patients with previously treated non‐small‐cell lung cancer. Thirty‐three patients with previously treated non‐small‐cell lung cancer who had received DR were eligible for our analysis. Of the 33 patients, 29 received prophylactic PEG‐G‐CSF immediately after DR, but none developed FN. However, FN was observed in 2 (50%) of the 4 patients that were not administered PEG‐CSF. The overall response and disease control rates in the 29 patients with prophylactic PEG‐GSF were 31% and 62%, respectively. The median progression‐free and overall survival rates of the patients with and without prophylactic PEG‐GSF were 177 and 163 days (P = 0.20), and 628 and 274 days (P = 0.13), respectively. Primary prophylactic PEG‐G‐CSF suppressed the occurrence of FN secondary to the administration of DR. John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd 2019-03-11 2019-04 /pmc/articles/PMC6449259/ /pubmed/30859745 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1759-7714.13022 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Thoracic Cancer published by China Lung Oncology Group and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes. |
spellingShingle | Brief Reports Mouri, Atsuto Kaira, Kyoichi Shiono, Ayako Yamaguchi, Ou Murayama, Yoshitake Kobayashi, Kunihiko Kagamu, Hiroshi Clinical significance of primary prophylactic pegylated‐granulocyte‐colony stimulating factor after the administration of ramucirumab plus docetaxel in patients with previously treated non‐small cell lung cancer |
title | Clinical significance of primary prophylactic pegylated‐granulocyte‐colony stimulating factor after the administration of ramucirumab plus docetaxel in patients with previously treated non‐small cell lung cancer |
title_full | Clinical significance of primary prophylactic pegylated‐granulocyte‐colony stimulating factor after the administration of ramucirumab plus docetaxel in patients with previously treated non‐small cell lung cancer |
title_fullStr | Clinical significance of primary prophylactic pegylated‐granulocyte‐colony stimulating factor after the administration of ramucirumab plus docetaxel in patients with previously treated non‐small cell lung cancer |
title_full_unstemmed | Clinical significance of primary prophylactic pegylated‐granulocyte‐colony stimulating factor after the administration of ramucirumab plus docetaxel in patients with previously treated non‐small cell lung cancer |
title_short | Clinical significance of primary prophylactic pegylated‐granulocyte‐colony stimulating factor after the administration of ramucirumab plus docetaxel in patients with previously treated non‐small cell lung cancer |
title_sort | clinical significance of primary prophylactic pegylated‐granulocyte‐colony stimulating factor after the administration of ramucirumab plus docetaxel in patients with previously treated non‐small cell lung cancer |
topic | Brief Reports |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6449259/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30859745 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1759-7714.13022 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mouriatsuto clinicalsignificanceofprimaryprophylacticpegylatedgranulocytecolonystimulatingfactoraftertheadministrationoframucirumabplusdocetaxelinpatientswithpreviouslytreatednonsmallcelllungcancer AT kairakyoichi clinicalsignificanceofprimaryprophylacticpegylatedgranulocytecolonystimulatingfactoraftertheadministrationoframucirumabplusdocetaxelinpatientswithpreviouslytreatednonsmallcelllungcancer AT shionoayako clinicalsignificanceofprimaryprophylacticpegylatedgranulocytecolonystimulatingfactoraftertheadministrationoframucirumabplusdocetaxelinpatientswithpreviouslytreatednonsmallcelllungcancer AT yamaguchiou clinicalsignificanceofprimaryprophylacticpegylatedgranulocytecolonystimulatingfactoraftertheadministrationoframucirumabplusdocetaxelinpatientswithpreviouslytreatednonsmallcelllungcancer AT murayamayoshitake clinicalsignificanceofprimaryprophylacticpegylatedgranulocytecolonystimulatingfactoraftertheadministrationoframucirumabplusdocetaxelinpatientswithpreviouslytreatednonsmallcelllungcancer AT kobayashikunihiko clinicalsignificanceofprimaryprophylacticpegylatedgranulocytecolonystimulatingfactoraftertheadministrationoframucirumabplusdocetaxelinpatientswithpreviouslytreatednonsmallcelllungcancer AT kagamuhiroshi clinicalsignificanceofprimaryprophylacticpegylatedgranulocytecolonystimulatingfactoraftertheadministrationoframucirumabplusdocetaxelinpatientswithpreviouslytreatednonsmallcelllungcancer |