Cargando…

Incidental intracranial meningiomas: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prognostic factors and outcomes

BACKGROUND: Incidental discovery accounts for 30% of newly-diagnosed intracranial meningiomas. There is no consensus on their optimal management. This review aimed to evaluate the outcomes of different management strategies for these tumors. METHODS: Using established systematic review methods, six...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Islim, Abdurrahman I., Mohan, Midhun, Moon, Richard D. C., Srikandarajah, Nisaharan, Mills, Samantha J., Brodbelt, Andrew R., Jenkinson, Michael D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6449307/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30656531
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11060-019-03104-3
_version_ 1783408815452979200
author Islim, Abdurrahman I.
Mohan, Midhun
Moon, Richard D. C.
Srikandarajah, Nisaharan
Mills, Samantha J.
Brodbelt, Andrew R.
Jenkinson, Michael D.
author_facet Islim, Abdurrahman I.
Mohan, Midhun
Moon, Richard D. C.
Srikandarajah, Nisaharan
Mills, Samantha J.
Brodbelt, Andrew R.
Jenkinson, Michael D.
author_sort Islim, Abdurrahman I.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Incidental discovery accounts for 30% of newly-diagnosed intracranial meningiomas. There is no consensus on their optimal management. This review aimed to evaluate the outcomes of different management strategies for these tumors. METHODS: Using established systematic review methods, six databases were scanned up to September 2017. Pooled event proportions were estimated using a random effects model. Meta-regression of prognostic factors was performed using individual patient data. RESULTS: Twenty studies (2130 patients) were included. Initial management strategies at diagnosis were: surgery (27.3%), stereotactic radiosurgery (22.0%) and active monitoring (50.7%) with a weighted mean follow-up of 49.5 months (SD = 29.3). The definition of meningioma growth and monitoring regimens varied widely impeding relevant meta-analysis. The pooled risk of symptom development in patients actively monitored was 8.1% (95% CI 2.7–16.1). Associated factors were peritumoral edema (OR 8.72 [95% CI 0.35–14.90]) and meningioma diameter ≥ 3 cm (OR 34.90 [95% CI 5.17–160.40]). The pooled proportion of intervention after a duration of active monitoring was 24.8% (95% CI 7.5–48.0). Weighted mean time-to-intervention was 24.8 months (SD = 18.2). The pooled risks of morbidity following surgery and radiosurgery, accounting for cross-over, were 11.8% (95% CI 3.7–23.5) and 32.0% (95% CI 10.6–70.5) respectively. The pooled proportion of operated meningioma being WHO grade I was 94.0% (95% CI 88.2–97.9). CONCLUSION: The management of incidental meningioma varies widely. Most patients who clinically or radiologically progressed did so within 5 years of diagnosis. Intervention at diagnosis may lead to unnecessary overtreatment. Prospective data is needed to develop a risk calculator to better inform management strategies. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s11060-019-03104-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6449307
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64493072019-04-17 Incidental intracranial meningiomas: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prognostic factors and outcomes Islim, Abdurrahman I. Mohan, Midhun Moon, Richard D. C. Srikandarajah, Nisaharan Mills, Samantha J. Brodbelt, Andrew R. Jenkinson, Michael D. J Neurooncol Topic Review BACKGROUND: Incidental discovery accounts for 30% of newly-diagnosed intracranial meningiomas. There is no consensus on their optimal management. This review aimed to evaluate the outcomes of different management strategies for these tumors. METHODS: Using established systematic review methods, six databases were scanned up to September 2017. Pooled event proportions were estimated using a random effects model. Meta-regression of prognostic factors was performed using individual patient data. RESULTS: Twenty studies (2130 patients) were included. Initial management strategies at diagnosis were: surgery (27.3%), stereotactic radiosurgery (22.0%) and active monitoring (50.7%) with a weighted mean follow-up of 49.5 months (SD = 29.3). The definition of meningioma growth and monitoring regimens varied widely impeding relevant meta-analysis. The pooled risk of symptom development in patients actively monitored was 8.1% (95% CI 2.7–16.1). Associated factors were peritumoral edema (OR 8.72 [95% CI 0.35–14.90]) and meningioma diameter ≥ 3 cm (OR 34.90 [95% CI 5.17–160.40]). The pooled proportion of intervention after a duration of active monitoring was 24.8% (95% CI 7.5–48.0). Weighted mean time-to-intervention was 24.8 months (SD = 18.2). The pooled risks of morbidity following surgery and radiosurgery, accounting for cross-over, were 11.8% (95% CI 3.7–23.5) and 32.0% (95% CI 10.6–70.5) respectively. The pooled proportion of operated meningioma being WHO grade I was 94.0% (95% CI 88.2–97.9). CONCLUSION: The management of incidental meningioma varies widely. Most patients who clinically or radiologically progressed did so within 5 years of diagnosis. Intervention at diagnosis may lead to unnecessary overtreatment. Prospective data is needed to develop a risk calculator to better inform management strategies. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s11060-019-03104-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer US 2019-01-17 2019 /pmc/articles/PMC6449307/ /pubmed/30656531 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11060-019-03104-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 OpenAccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Topic Review
Islim, Abdurrahman I.
Mohan, Midhun
Moon, Richard D. C.
Srikandarajah, Nisaharan
Mills, Samantha J.
Brodbelt, Andrew R.
Jenkinson, Michael D.
Incidental intracranial meningiomas: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prognostic factors and outcomes
title Incidental intracranial meningiomas: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prognostic factors and outcomes
title_full Incidental intracranial meningiomas: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prognostic factors and outcomes
title_fullStr Incidental intracranial meningiomas: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prognostic factors and outcomes
title_full_unstemmed Incidental intracranial meningiomas: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prognostic factors and outcomes
title_short Incidental intracranial meningiomas: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prognostic factors and outcomes
title_sort incidental intracranial meningiomas: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prognostic factors and outcomes
topic Topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6449307/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30656531
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11060-019-03104-3
work_keys_str_mv AT islimabdurrahmani incidentalintracranialmeningiomasasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofprognosticfactorsandoutcomes
AT mohanmidhun incidentalintracranialmeningiomasasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofprognosticfactorsandoutcomes
AT moonricharddc incidentalintracranialmeningiomasasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofprognosticfactorsandoutcomes
AT srikandarajahnisaharan incidentalintracranialmeningiomasasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofprognosticfactorsandoutcomes
AT millssamanthaj incidentalintracranialmeningiomasasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofprognosticfactorsandoutcomes
AT brodbeltandrewr incidentalintracranialmeningiomasasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofprognosticfactorsandoutcomes
AT jenkinsonmichaeld incidentalintracranialmeningiomasasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofprognosticfactorsandoutcomes