Cargando…

Contextual Choices in Online Physics Problems: Promising Insights Into Closing the Gender Gap

Throughout the world, female students are less likely than males to take advanced physics courses. This mixed-methods study uses a concurrent, nested design to study an online homework intervention designed to address choice and achievement. A choice of three different contexts (biological, sports,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wheeler, Samuel R., Blanchard, Margaret R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6449438/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30984064
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00594
_version_ 1783408846226587648
author Wheeler, Samuel R.
Blanchard, Margaret R.
author_facet Wheeler, Samuel R.
Blanchard, Margaret R.
author_sort Wheeler, Samuel R.
collection PubMed
description Throughout the world, female students are less likely than males to take advanced physics courses. This mixed-methods study uses a concurrent, nested design to study an online homework intervention designed to address choice and achievement. A choice of three different contexts (biological, sports, and traditional) were offered to students for each physics problem, intending to stimulate females’ interest and enhance achievement. Informed by aspects of Artino’s social-cognitive model of academic motivation and emotion, we investigated: Which context of physics problems do males and females select?; What explanations do students give for their choices?; Are there differences in the achievement of males and females?; and Is there a relationship between student achievement and the context selected? Fifty-two high school physics students from five US states participated. Data included pre- and post-Force Concept Inventory scores, homework context choices and achievement, and rationales for choices. Findings indicate that females were most likely to select biology contexts; males, traditional. All students made more attempts on video questions over word questions, although females did not score as well. For all questions, students generally persisted until they answered them correctly, with females taking fewer attempts on problems. Context choice was mostly driven by interest, for males, and perceptions of difficulty level for females; however, rationales were indistinguishable by gender. On their first homework question attempt, females scored significantly better than the males. Initially, males had significantly higher FCI scores; post homework intervention, females increased their mean scores significantly on the FCI, erasing the initial gender gap, with no growth nor decline in males’ scores. Females with FCI growth were equally as likely to choose biology contexts as traditional contexts; males were more likely to choose biology contexts. Findings from this study suggest that modest changes to homework problems that provide choice and make the physics problems more contextually interesting—even without changes in classroom instruction—could increase interest and motivation in students and increase achievement for both male and female students. Recommendations will be discussed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6449438
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64494382019-04-12 Contextual Choices in Online Physics Problems: Promising Insights Into Closing the Gender Gap Wheeler, Samuel R. Blanchard, Margaret R. Front Psychol Psychology Throughout the world, female students are less likely than males to take advanced physics courses. This mixed-methods study uses a concurrent, nested design to study an online homework intervention designed to address choice and achievement. A choice of three different contexts (biological, sports, and traditional) were offered to students for each physics problem, intending to stimulate females’ interest and enhance achievement. Informed by aspects of Artino’s social-cognitive model of academic motivation and emotion, we investigated: Which context of physics problems do males and females select?; What explanations do students give for their choices?; Are there differences in the achievement of males and females?; and Is there a relationship between student achievement and the context selected? Fifty-two high school physics students from five US states participated. Data included pre- and post-Force Concept Inventory scores, homework context choices and achievement, and rationales for choices. Findings indicate that females were most likely to select biology contexts; males, traditional. All students made more attempts on video questions over word questions, although females did not score as well. For all questions, students generally persisted until they answered them correctly, with females taking fewer attempts on problems. Context choice was mostly driven by interest, for males, and perceptions of difficulty level for females; however, rationales were indistinguishable by gender. On their first homework question attempt, females scored significantly better than the males. Initially, males had significantly higher FCI scores; post homework intervention, females increased their mean scores significantly on the FCI, erasing the initial gender gap, with no growth nor decline in males’ scores. Females with FCI growth were equally as likely to choose biology contexts as traditional contexts; males were more likely to choose biology contexts. Findings from this study suggest that modest changes to homework problems that provide choice and make the physics problems more contextually interesting—even without changes in classroom instruction—could increase interest and motivation in students and increase achievement for both male and female students. Recommendations will be discussed. Frontiers Media S.A. 2019-03-29 /pmc/articles/PMC6449438/ /pubmed/30984064 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00594 Text en Copyright © 2019 Wheeler and Blanchard. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychology
Wheeler, Samuel R.
Blanchard, Margaret R.
Contextual Choices in Online Physics Problems: Promising Insights Into Closing the Gender Gap
title Contextual Choices in Online Physics Problems: Promising Insights Into Closing the Gender Gap
title_full Contextual Choices in Online Physics Problems: Promising Insights Into Closing the Gender Gap
title_fullStr Contextual Choices in Online Physics Problems: Promising Insights Into Closing the Gender Gap
title_full_unstemmed Contextual Choices in Online Physics Problems: Promising Insights Into Closing the Gender Gap
title_short Contextual Choices in Online Physics Problems: Promising Insights Into Closing the Gender Gap
title_sort contextual choices in online physics problems: promising insights into closing the gender gap
topic Psychology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6449438/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30984064
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00594
work_keys_str_mv AT wheelersamuelr contextualchoicesinonlinephysicsproblemspromisinginsightsintoclosingthegendergap
AT blanchardmargaretr contextualchoicesinonlinephysicsproblemspromisinginsightsintoclosingthegendergap