Cargando…
Communication channels for air quality alerts in the United States
Short-term exposure to air pollution can result in acute health effects, particularly for individuals with respiratory and cardiovascular disease. Air quality alert programs that notify the public about high air pollution days are critical for susceptible populations. We assessed how U.S. adults rec...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6449704/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30989035 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pmedr.2019.100860 |
_version_ | 1783408905683992576 |
---|---|
author | Pennington, Audrey F. Sircar, Kanta Hsu, Joy Zahran, Hatice S. Damon, Scott A. Mirabelli, Maria C. |
author_facet | Pennington, Audrey F. Sircar, Kanta Hsu, Joy Zahran, Hatice S. Damon, Scott A. Mirabelli, Maria C. |
author_sort | Pennington, Audrey F. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Short-term exposure to air pollution can result in acute health effects, particularly for individuals with respiratory and cardiovascular disease. Air quality alert programs that notify the public about high air pollution days are critical for susceptible populations. We assessed how U.S. adults receive air quality alerts and whether it varies by demographic or health characteristics. We analyzed data from the summer 2014 wave of ConsumerStyles, a nationally representative survey of U.S. adults (n = 4269). We calculated the weighted proportion of individuals who received air quality alerts from seven communication channels, combining all individuals and stratifying by demographics. To assess whether the reach of communication channels varied by respiratory and cardiovascular disease status, we computed weighted prevalence ratios adjusted for sex, age, race, and education. Forty-eight percent of U.S. adults had heard about air quality alerts. Within every demographic category, television was the most common communication channel (76% among individuals aware of air quality alerts). Other common communication modes were radio (30%), newspaper (24%), and internet (20%). Less common communication modes were friend or family member, mobile phone or device app, and electronic highway sign. The reach of communication channels varied by demographic factors, such as age, but not by respiratory or cardiovascular disease status. Television is the most common communication channel for receiving air quality alerts. Expanding use of other communication channels might increase awareness of air quality alerts. These results can help decision-makers target communication channels that reach susceptible populations and will achieve the greatest impact. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6449704 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-64497042019-04-15 Communication channels for air quality alerts in the United States Pennington, Audrey F. Sircar, Kanta Hsu, Joy Zahran, Hatice S. Damon, Scott A. Mirabelli, Maria C. Prev Med Rep Short Communication Short-term exposure to air pollution can result in acute health effects, particularly for individuals with respiratory and cardiovascular disease. Air quality alert programs that notify the public about high air pollution days are critical for susceptible populations. We assessed how U.S. adults receive air quality alerts and whether it varies by demographic or health characteristics. We analyzed data from the summer 2014 wave of ConsumerStyles, a nationally representative survey of U.S. adults (n = 4269). We calculated the weighted proportion of individuals who received air quality alerts from seven communication channels, combining all individuals and stratifying by demographics. To assess whether the reach of communication channels varied by respiratory and cardiovascular disease status, we computed weighted prevalence ratios adjusted for sex, age, race, and education. Forty-eight percent of U.S. adults had heard about air quality alerts. Within every demographic category, television was the most common communication channel (76% among individuals aware of air quality alerts). Other common communication modes were radio (30%), newspaper (24%), and internet (20%). Less common communication modes were friend or family member, mobile phone or device app, and electronic highway sign. The reach of communication channels varied by demographic factors, such as age, but not by respiratory or cardiovascular disease status. Television is the most common communication channel for receiving air quality alerts. Expanding use of other communication channels might increase awareness of air quality alerts. These results can help decision-makers target communication channels that reach susceptible populations and will achieve the greatest impact. Elsevier 2019-03-28 /pmc/articles/PMC6449704/ /pubmed/30989035 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pmedr.2019.100860 Text en http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Short Communication Pennington, Audrey F. Sircar, Kanta Hsu, Joy Zahran, Hatice S. Damon, Scott A. Mirabelli, Maria C. Communication channels for air quality alerts in the United States |
title | Communication channels for air quality alerts in the United States |
title_full | Communication channels for air quality alerts in the United States |
title_fullStr | Communication channels for air quality alerts in the United States |
title_full_unstemmed | Communication channels for air quality alerts in the United States |
title_short | Communication channels for air quality alerts in the United States |
title_sort | communication channels for air quality alerts in the united states |
topic | Short Communication |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6449704/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30989035 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pmedr.2019.100860 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT penningtonaudreyf communicationchannelsforairqualityalertsintheunitedstates AT sircarkanta communicationchannelsforairqualityalertsintheunitedstates AT hsujoy communicationchannelsforairqualityalertsintheunitedstates AT zahranhatices communicationchannelsforairqualityalertsintheunitedstates AT damonscotta communicationchannelsforairqualityalertsintheunitedstates AT mirabellimariac communicationchannelsforairqualityalertsintheunitedstates |