Cargando…

A Pilot Study of Percutaneous Interlaminar Endoscopic Lumbar Sequestrectomy: A Modern Strategy to Tackle Medically-Refractory Radiculopathies and Restore Spinal Function

OBJECTIVE: Angled scopes allow 360° visualization, which makes percutaneous endoscopic techniques (percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy, PELD) particularly attractive for sequestrectomies, which entail the removal of extruded lumbar disc fragments that have migrated caudally or cranially betwee...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Priola, Stefano Maria, Ganau, Mario, Raffa, Giovanni, Scibilia, Antonino, Farrash, Faisal, Germanò, Antonino
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Korean Spinal Neurosurgery Society 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6449818/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30943714
http://dx.doi.org/10.14245/ns.1836210.105
_version_ 1783408930246885376
author Priola, Stefano Maria
Ganau, Mario
Raffa, Giovanni
Scibilia, Antonino
Farrash, Faisal
Germanò, Antonino
author_facet Priola, Stefano Maria
Ganau, Mario
Raffa, Giovanni
Scibilia, Antonino
Farrash, Faisal
Germanò, Antonino
author_sort Priola, Stefano Maria
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Angled scopes allow 360° visualization, which makes percutaneous endoscopic techniques (percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy, PELD) particularly attractive for sequestrectomies, which entail the removal of extruded lumbar disc fragments that have migrated caudally or cranially between the ligaments, foramina, and neural structures, while preserving the disc. Although many different PELD techniques are currently available, not all of them are suitable for sequestrectomies; furthermore, long-term follow-up data are unfortunately lacking. METHODS: A pilot study was conducted on a cohort of 270 patients with lumbar radiculopathy undergoing minimally invasive spine surgery (PELD or microdiscectomy), of whom only 7 were eligible for endoscopic interlaminar sequestrectomy with disc preservation. The patients’ baseline conditions and clinical outcomes were measured with the Oswestry Disability Index and a visual analogue scale. Long-term follow-up was conducted using satisfaction questionnaires that were based on the MacNab criteria and administered by medical/nursing personnel not involved in their primary surgical management. RESULTS: EasyGo system was eventually used in 5 PELD cases. No dural tears, infections, or nerve root injuries were recorded in patients undergoing sequestrectomy. Surgical events, including blood loss and overall length of hospital stay, did not differ significantly among the 270 patients. In the group treated with endoscopic sequestrectomy, no recurrences or complications were noted during a follow-up of 3 years, and an excellent degree of satisfaction was reported. CONCLUSION: We provide OCEBM (Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine) level 3 evidence that interlaminar endoscopic sequestrectomy is a tailored and well-tolerated surgical option; nonetheless, a cost-effectiveness analysis assessing the interval until return to working activities and long-term benefits is warranted.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6449818
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Korean Spinal Neurosurgery Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64498182019-04-10 A Pilot Study of Percutaneous Interlaminar Endoscopic Lumbar Sequestrectomy: A Modern Strategy to Tackle Medically-Refractory Radiculopathies and Restore Spinal Function Priola, Stefano Maria Ganau, Mario Raffa, Giovanni Scibilia, Antonino Farrash, Faisal Germanò, Antonino Neurospine Original Article OBJECTIVE: Angled scopes allow 360° visualization, which makes percutaneous endoscopic techniques (percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy, PELD) particularly attractive for sequestrectomies, which entail the removal of extruded lumbar disc fragments that have migrated caudally or cranially between the ligaments, foramina, and neural structures, while preserving the disc. Although many different PELD techniques are currently available, not all of them are suitable for sequestrectomies; furthermore, long-term follow-up data are unfortunately lacking. METHODS: A pilot study was conducted on a cohort of 270 patients with lumbar radiculopathy undergoing minimally invasive spine surgery (PELD or microdiscectomy), of whom only 7 were eligible for endoscopic interlaminar sequestrectomy with disc preservation. The patients’ baseline conditions and clinical outcomes were measured with the Oswestry Disability Index and a visual analogue scale. Long-term follow-up was conducted using satisfaction questionnaires that were based on the MacNab criteria and administered by medical/nursing personnel not involved in their primary surgical management. RESULTS: EasyGo system was eventually used in 5 PELD cases. No dural tears, infections, or nerve root injuries were recorded in patients undergoing sequestrectomy. Surgical events, including blood loss and overall length of hospital stay, did not differ significantly among the 270 patients. In the group treated with endoscopic sequestrectomy, no recurrences or complications were noted during a follow-up of 3 years, and an excellent degree of satisfaction was reported. CONCLUSION: We provide OCEBM (Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine) level 3 evidence that interlaminar endoscopic sequestrectomy is a tailored and well-tolerated surgical option; nonetheless, a cost-effectiveness analysis assessing the interval until return to working activities and long-term benefits is warranted. Korean Spinal Neurosurgery Society 2019-03 2019-03-31 /pmc/articles/PMC6449818/ /pubmed/30943714 http://dx.doi.org/10.14245/ns.1836210.105 Text en Copyright © 2019 by the Korean Spinal Neurosurgery Society This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Priola, Stefano Maria
Ganau, Mario
Raffa, Giovanni
Scibilia, Antonino
Farrash, Faisal
Germanò, Antonino
A Pilot Study of Percutaneous Interlaminar Endoscopic Lumbar Sequestrectomy: A Modern Strategy to Tackle Medically-Refractory Radiculopathies and Restore Spinal Function
title A Pilot Study of Percutaneous Interlaminar Endoscopic Lumbar Sequestrectomy: A Modern Strategy to Tackle Medically-Refractory Radiculopathies and Restore Spinal Function
title_full A Pilot Study of Percutaneous Interlaminar Endoscopic Lumbar Sequestrectomy: A Modern Strategy to Tackle Medically-Refractory Radiculopathies and Restore Spinal Function
title_fullStr A Pilot Study of Percutaneous Interlaminar Endoscopic Lumbar Sequestrectomy: A Modern Strategy to Tackle Medically-Refractory Radiculopathies and Restore Spinal Function
title_full_unstemmed A Pilot Study of Percutaneous Interlaminar Endoscopic Lumbar Sequestrectomy: A Modern Strategy to Tackle Medically-Refractory Radiculopathies and Restore Spinal Function
title_short A Pilot Study of Percutaneous Interlaminar Endoscopic Lumbar Sequestrectomy: A Modern Strategy to Tackle Medically-Refractory Radiculopathies and Restore Spinal Function
title_sort pilot study of percutaneous interlaminar endoscopic lumbar sequestrectomy: a modern strategy to tackle medically-refractory radiculopathies and restore spinal function
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6449818/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30943714
http://dx.doi.org/10.14245/ns.1836210.105
work_keys_str_mv AT priolastefanomaria apilotstudyofpercutaneousinterlaminarendoscopiclumbarsequestrectomyamodernstrategytotacklemedicallyrefractoryradiculopathiesandrestorespinalfunction
AT ganaumario apilotstudyofpercutaneousinterlaminarendoscopiclumbarsequestrectomyamodernstrategytotacklemedicallyrefractoryradiculopathiesandrestorespinalfunction
AT raffagiovanni apilotstudyofpercutaneousinterlaminarendoscopiclumbarsequestrectomyamodernstrategytotacklemedicallyrefractoryradiculopathiesandrestorespinalfunction
AT scibiliaantonino apilotstudyofpercutaneousinterlaminarendoscopiclumbarsequestrectomyamodernstrategytotacklemedicallyrefractoryradiculopathiesandrestorespinalfunction
AT farrashfaisal apilotstudyofpercutaneousinterlaminarendoscopiclumbarsequestrectomyamodernstrategytotacklemedicallyrefractoryradiculopathiesandrestorespinalfunction
AT germanoantonino apilotstudyofpercutaneousinterlaminarendoscopiclumbarsequestrectomyamodernstrategytotacklemedicallyrefractoryradiculopathiesandrestorespinalfunction
AT priolastefanomaria pilotstudyofpercutaneousinterlaminarendoscopiclumbarsequestrectomyamodernstrategytotacklemedicallyrefractoryradiculopathiesandrestorespinalfunction
AT ganaumario pilotstudyofpercutaneousinterlaminarendoscopiclumbarsequestrectomyamodernstrategytotacklemedicallyrefractoryradiculopathiesandrestorespinalfunction
AT raffagiovanni pilotstudyofpercutaneousinterlaminarendoscopiclumbarsequestrectomyamodernstrategytotacklemedicallyrefractoryradiculopathiesandrestorespinalfunction
AT scibiliaantonino pilotstudyofpercutaneousinterlaminarendoscopiclumbarsequestrectomyamodernstrategytotacklemedicallyrefractoryradiculopathiesandrestorespinalfunction
AT farrashfaisal pilotstudyofpercutaneousinterlaminarendoscopiclumbarsequestrectomyamodernstrategytotacklemedicallyrefractoryradiculopathiesandrestorespinalfunction
AT germanoantonino pilotstudyofpercutaneousinterlaminarendoscopiclumbarsequestrectomyamodernstrategytotacklemedicallyrefractoryradiculopathiesandrestorespinalfunction