Cargando…

Paths to language development in at risk children: a qualitative comparative analysis (QCA)

BACKGROUND: Childhood language development is related to long term educational, employment, health and social outcomes. Previous research identifies a complex range of risk and protective factors which result in good and poor language outcomes for children, however children at risk are an underrepre...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Short, Kate, Eadie, Patricia, Kemp, Lynn
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6449893/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30953552
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12887-019-1449-z
_version_ 1783408943634055168
author Short, Kate
Eadie, Patricia
Kemp, Lynn
author_facet Short, Kate
Eadie, Patricia
Kemp, Lynn
author_sort Short, Kate
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Childhood language development is related to long term educational, employment, health and social outcomes. Previous research identifies a complex range of risk and protective factors which result in good and poor language outcomes for children, however children at risk are an underrepresented group in these studies. Our aim is to investigate the combinations of factors (paths) that result in good and poor language outcomes for a group of 5 year old children of mothers experiencing adversity. METHODS: This mixed methods study utilised longitudinal data from a randomised control trial of sustained home visiting (MECSH) to determine the language outcomes in at risk children. Mothers were randomly assigned to a comparison group at entry to the study (prior to child’s birth). Their children who were retained at entry to school completed language assessments (n = 41) and were participants in this study. Influence of 13 key factors derived from the extant literature that impact language development were explored. Regression was used to determine the six key factors of influence and these were used in the Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA). QCA was employed to examine the necessary and sufficient conditions and paths affecting language development linked to good and poor language outcomes. A post hoc analysis of the risk and protective paths to good and poor language outcomes was also conducted. RESULTS: Thirteen distinct pathways led to good language outcomes and four paths to poor language outcomes in five year old at risk children. A variety of condition combinations resulted in these outcomes, with maternal responsivity, toddler development and number of children in the home being key. High and low maternal education influenced both good and poor language development. CONCLUSIONS: The paths to good and poor language outcomes were different and complex. Most paths to a good language outcome involved protective factors, though not always. In addition, paths to poor language more often involved risk factors. The varied patterns of risk and protective factors point to the need for interventions across the first five years of life in both health and education for families which can respond to these risk and protective patterns. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The original RCT was retrospectively registered in the ANCTR: ACTRN12608000473369. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12887-019-1449-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6449893
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64498932019-04-15 Paths to language development in at risk children: a qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) Short, Kate Eadie, Patricia Kemp, Lynn BMC Pediatr Research Article BACKGROUND: Childhood language development is related to long term educational, employment, health and social outcomes. Previous research identifies a complex range of risk and protective factors which result in good and poor language outcomes for children, however children at risk are an underrepresented group in these studies. Our aim is to investigate the combinations of factors (paths) that result in good and poor language outcomes for a group of 5 year old children of mothers experiencing adversity. METHODS: This mixed methods study utilised longitudinal data from a randomised control trial of sustained home visiting (MECSH) to determine the language outcomes in at risk children. Mothers were randomly assigned to a comparison group at entry to the study (prior to child’s birth). Their children who were retained at entry to school completed language assessments (n = 41) and were participants in this study. Influence of 13 key factors derived from the extant literature that impact language development were explored. Regression was used to determine the six key factors of influence and these were used in the Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA). QCA was employed to examine the necessary and sufficient conditions and paths affecting language development linked to good and poor language outcomes. A post hoc analysis of the risk and protective paths to good and poor language outcomes was also conducted. RESULTS: Thirteen distinct pathways led to good language outcomes and four paths to poor language outcomes in five year old at risk children. A variety of condition combinations resulted in these outcomes, with maternal responsivity, toddler development and number of children in the home being key. High and low maternal education influenced both good and poor language development. CONCLUSIONS: The paths to good and poor language outcomes were different and complex. Most paths to a good language outcome involved protective factors, though not always. In addition, paths to poor language more often involved risk factors. The varied patterns of risk and protective factors point to the need for interventions across the first five years of life in both health and education for families which can respond to these risk and protective patterns. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The original RCT was retrospectively registered in the ANCTR: ACTRN12608000473369. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12887-019-1449-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2019-04-05 /pmc/articles/PMC6449893/ /pubmed/30953552 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12887-019-1449-z Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Short, Kate
Eadie, Patricia
Kemp, Lynn
Paths to language development in at risk children: a qualitative comparative analysis (QCA)
title Paths to language development in at risk children: a qualitative comparative analysis (QCA)
title_full Paths to language development in at risk children: a qualitative comparative analysis (QCA)
title_fullStr Paths to language development in at risk children: a qualitative comparative analysis (QCA)
title_full_unstemmed Paths to language development in at risk children: a qualitative comparative analysis (QCA)
title_short Paths to language development in at risk children: a qualitative comparative analysis (QCA)
title_sort paths to language development in at risk children: a qualitative comparative analysis (qca)
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6449893/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30953552
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12887-019-1449-z
work_keys_str_mv AT shortkate pathstolanguagedevelopmentinatriskchildrenaqualitativecomparativeanalysisqca
AT eadiepatricia pathstolanguagedevelopmentinatriskchildrenaqualitativecomparativeanalysisqca
AT kemplynn pathstolanguagedevelopmentinatriskchildrenaqualitativecomparativeanalysisqca