Cargando…

Management of intrathoracic and cervical anastomotic leakage after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: a systematic review

BACKGROUND: Anastomotic leakage (0–30%) after esophagectomy is a severe complication and is associated with considerable morbidity and mortality. The aim of this study was to determine which treatment for anastomotic leakage after esophagectomy have the best clinical outcome, based on the currently...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Verstegen, Moniek H. P., Bouwense, Stefan A. W., van Workum, Frans, ten Broek, Richard, Siersema, Peter D., Rovers, Maroeska, Rosman, Camiel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6449949/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30988695
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13017-019-0235-4
_version_ 1783408955887714304
author Verstegen, Moniek H. P.
Bouwense, Stefan A. W.
van Workum, Frans
ten Broek, Richard
Siersema, Peter D.
Rovers, Maroeska
Rosman, Camiel
author_facet Verstegen, Moniek H. P.
Bouwense, Stefan A. W.
van Workum, Frans
ten Broek, Richard
Siersema, Peter D.
Rovers, Maroeska
Rosman, Camiel
author_sort Verstegen, Moniek H. P.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Anastomotic leakage (0–30%) after esophagectomy is a severe complication and is associated with considerable morbidity and mortality. The aim of this study was to determine which treatment for anastomotic leakage after esophagectomy have the best clinical outcome, based on the currently available literature. METHODS: A systematic literature search was performed in Medline, Embase, and Web of Science until April 2017. All studies reporting on the specific treatment of cervical or intrathoracic anastomotic leakage following esophagectomy with gastric tube reconstruction for esophageal or cardia cancer were included. The primary outcome parameter was postoperative mortality. Methodological quality was assessed by the Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale. RESULTS: Nineteen retrospective cohort studies including 273 patients were identified. Methodological quality of all studies was poor to moderate. Mortality rates of intrathoracic anastomotic leakages in the treatment groups were as follows: conservative (14%), endoscopic stent (8%), endoscopic drainage (8%), endoscopic vacuum-assisted closure system (0%), and surgery treatment group (50%). Mortality rates of cervical anastomotic leakages in the treatment groups were as follows: conservative (8%), endoscopic stent (29%), and endoscopic dilatation (0%). DISCUSSION: Due to small cohorts, heterogeneity between studies, and lack of data regarding leakage characteristics, no evidence supporting a specific treatment for anastomotic leakage after esophagectomy was found. A severity score based on leakage characteristics instead of treatment given is essential for determining the optimal treatment of anastomotic leakage. In the absence of robust evidence-based treatment guidelines, we suggest customized treatment depending on sequelae of the leak and clinical condition of the patient. PrDepartment of Surgery, Radboudumc, P.O.B. 9101/618 NLactical advices are provided. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Registration number PROSPERO: CRD42016032374. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13017-019-0235-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6449949
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64499492019-04-15 Management of intrathoracic and cervical anastomotic leakage after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: a systematic review Verstegen, Moniek H. P. Bouwense, Stefan A. W. van Workum, Frans ten Broek, Richard Siersema, Peter D. Rovers, Maroeska Rosman, Camiel World J Emerg Surg Review BACKGROUND: Anastomotic leakage (0–30%) after esophagectomy is a severe complication and is associated with considerable morbidity and mortality. The aim of this study was to determine which treatment for anastomotic leakage after esophagectomy have the best clinical outcome, based on the currently available literature. METHODS: A systematic literature search was performed in Medline, Embase, and Web of Science until April 2017. All studies reporting on the specific treatment of cervical or intrathoracic anastomotic leakage following esophagectomy with gastric tube reconstruction for esophageal or cardia cancer were included. The primary outcome parameter was postoperative mortality. Methodological quality was assessed by the Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale. RESULTS: Nineteen retrospective cohort studies including 273 patients were identified. Methodological quality of all studies was poor to moderate. Mortality rates of intrathoracic anastomotic leakages in the treatment groups were as follows: conservative (14%), endoscopic stent (8%), endoscopic drainage (8%), endoscopic vacuum-assisted closure system (0%), and surgery treatment group (50%). Mortality rates of cervical anastomotic leakages in the treatment groups were as follows: conservative (8%), endoscopic stent (29%), and endoscopic dilatation (0%). DISCUSSION: Due to small cohorts, heterogeneity between studies, and lack of data regarding leakage characteristics, no evidence supporting a specific treatment for anastomotic leakage after esophagectomy was found. A severity score based on leakage characteristics instead of treatment given is essential for determining the optimal treatment of anastomotic leakage. In the absence of robust evidence-based treatment guidelines, we suggest customized treatment depending on sequelae of the leak and clinical condition of the patient. PrDepartment of Surgery, Radboudumc, P.O.B. 9101/618 NLactical advices are provided. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Registration number PROSPERO: CRD42016032374. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13017-019-0235-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2019-04-04 /pmc/articles/PMC6449949/ /pubmed/30988695 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13017-019-0235-4 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Review
Verstegen, Moniek H. P.
Bouwense, Stefan A. W.
van Workum, Frans
ten Broek, Richard
Siersema, Peter D.
Rovers, Maroeska
Rosman, Camiel
Management of intrathoracic and cervical anastomotic leakage after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: a systematic review
title Management of intrathoracic and cervical anastomotic leakage after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: a systematic review
title_full Management of intrathoracic and cervical anastomotic leakage after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: a systematic review
title_fullStr Management of intrathoracic and cervical anastomotic leakage after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Management of intrathoracic and cervical anastomotic leakage after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: a systematic review
title_short Management of intrathoracic and cervical anastomotic leakage after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: a systematic review
title_sort management of intrathoracic and cervical anastomotic leakage after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: a systematic review
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6449949/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30988695
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13017-019-0235-4
work_keys_str_mv AT verstegenmoniekhp managementofintrathoracicandcervicalanastomoticleakageafteresophagectomyforesophagealcancerasystematicreview
AT bouwensestefanaw managementofintrathoracicandcervicalanastomoticleakageafteresophagectomyforesophagealcancerasystematicreview
AT vanworkumfrans managementofintrathoracicandcervicalanastomoticleakageafteresophagectomyforesophagealcancerasystematicreview
AT tenbroekrichard managementofintrathoracicandcervicalanastomoticleakageafteresophagectomyforesophagealcancerasystematicreview
AT siersemapeterd managementofintrathoracicandcervicalanastomoticleakageafteresophagectomyforesophagealcancerasystematicreview
AT roversmaroeska managementofintrathoracicandcervicalanastomoticleakageafteresophagectomyforesophagealcancerasystematicreview
AT rosmancamiel managementofintrathoracicandcervicalanastomoticleakageafteresophagectomyforesophagealcancerasystematicreview