Cargando…
Management of intrathoracic and cervical anastomotic leakage after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: a systematic review
BACKGROUND: Anastomotic leakage (0–30%) after esophagectomy is a severe complication and is associated with considerable morbidity and mortality. The aim of this study was to determine which treatment for anastomotic leakage after esophagectomy have the best clinical outcome, based on the currently...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6449949/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30988695 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13017-019-0235-4 |
_version_ | 1783408955887714304 |
---|---|
author | Verstegen, Moniek H. P. Bouwense, Stefan A. W. van Workum, Frans ten Broek, Richard Siersema, Peter D. Rovers, Maroeska Rosman, Camiel |
author_facet | Verstegen, Moniek H. P. Bouwense, Stefan A. W. van Workum, Frans ten Broek, Richard Siersema, Peter D. Rovers, Maroeska Rosman, Camiel |
author_sort | Verstegen, Moniek H. P. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Anastomotic leakage (0–30%) after esophagectomy is a severe complication and is associated with considerable morbidity and mortality. The aim of this study was to determine which treatment for anastomotic leakage after esophagectomy have the best clinical outcome, based on the currently available literature. METHODS: A systematic literature search was performed in Medline, Embase, and Web of Science until April 2017. All studies reporting on the specific treatment of cervical or intrathoracic anastomotic leakage following esophagectomy with gastric tube reconstruction for esophageal or cardia cancer were included. The primary outcome parameter was postoperative mortality. Methodological quality was assessed by the Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale. RESULTS: Nineteen retrospective cohort studies including 273 patients were identified. Methodological quality of all studies was poor to moderate. Mortality rates of intrathoracic anastomotic leakages in the treatment groups were as follows: conservative (14%), endoscopic stent (8%), endoscopic drainage (8%), endoscopic vacuum-assisted closure system (0%), and surgery treatment group (50%). Mortality rates of cervical anastomotic leakages in the treatment groups were as follows: conservative (8%), endoscopic stent (29%), and endoscopic dilatation (0%). DISCUSSION: Due to small cohorts, heterogeneity between studies, and lack of data regarding leakage characteristics, no evidence supporting a specific treatment for anastomotic leakage after esophagectomy was found. A severity score based on leakage characteristics instead of treatment given is essential for determining the optimal treatment of anastomotic leakage. In the absence of robust evidence-based treatment guidelines, we suggest customized treatment depending on sequelae of the leak and clinical condition of the patient. PrDepartment of Surgery, Radboudumc, P.O.B. 9101/618 NLactical advices are provided. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Registration number PROSPERO: CRD42016032374. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13017-019-0235-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6449949 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-64499492019-04-15 Management of intrathoracic and cervical anastomotic leakage after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: a systematic review Verstegen, Moniek H. P. Bouwense, Stefan A. W. van Workum, Frans ten Broek, Richard Siersema, Peter D. Rovers, Maroeska Rosman, Camiel World J Emerg Surg Review BACKGROUND: Anastomotic leakage (0–30%) after esophagectomy is a severe complication and is associated with considerable morbidity and mortality. The aim of this study was to determine which treatment for anastomotic leakage after esophagectomy have the best clinical outcome, based on the currently available literature. METHODS: A systematic literature search was performed in Medline, Embase, and Web of Science until April 2017. All studies reporting on the specific treatment of cervical or intrathoracic anastomotic leakage following esophagectomy with gastric tube reconstruction for esophageal or cardia cancer were included. The primary outcome parameter was postoperative mortality. Methodological quality was assessed by the Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale. RESULTS: Nineteen retrospective cohort studies including 273 patients were identified. Methodological quality of all studies was poor to moderate. Mortality rates of intrathoracic anastomotic leakages in the treatment groups were as follows: conservative (14%), endoscopic stent (8%), endoscopic drainage (8%), endoscopic vacuum-assisted closure system (0%), and surgery treatment group (50%). Mortality rates of cervical anastomotic leakages in the treatment groups were as follows: conservative (8%), endoscopic stent (29%), and endoscopic dilatation (0%). DISCUSSION: Due to small cohorts, heterogeneity between studies, and lack of data regarding leakage characteristics, no evidence supporting a specific treatment for anastomotic leakage after esophagectomy was found. A severity score based on leakage characteristics instead of treatment given is essential for determining the optimal treatment of anastomotic leakage. In the absence of robust evidence-based treatment guidelines, we suggest customized treatment depending on sequelae of the leak and clinical condition of the patient. PrDepartment of Surgery, Radboudumc, P.O.B. 9101/618 NLactical advices are provided. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Registration number PROSPERO: CRD42016032374. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13017-019-0235-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2019-04-04 /pmc/articles/PMC6449949/ /pubmed/30988695 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13017-019-0235-4 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Review Verstegen, Moniek H. P. Bouwense, Stefan A. W. van Workum, Frans ten Broek, Richard Siersema, Peter D. Rovers, Maroeska Rosman, Camiel Management of intrathoracic and cervical anastomotic leakage after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: a systematic review |
title | Management of intrathoracic and cervical anastomotic leakage after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: a systematic review |
title_full | Management of intrathoracic and cervical anastomotic leakage after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: a systematic review |
title_fullStr | Management of intrathoracic and cervical anastomotic leakage after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: a systematic review |
title_full_unstemmed | Management of intrathoracic and cervical anastomotic leakage after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: a systematic review |
title_short | Management of intrathoracic and cervical anastomotic leakage after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: a systematic review |
title_sort | management of intrathoracic and cervical anastomotic leakage after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: a systematic review |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6449949/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30988695 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13017-019-0235-4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT verstegenmoniekhp managementofintrathoracicandcervicalanastomoticleakageafteresophagectomyforesophagealcancerasystematicreview AT bouwensestefanaw managementofintrathoracicandcervicalanastomoticleakageafteresophagectomyforesophagealcancerasystematicreview AT vanworkumfrans managementofintrathoracicandcervicalanastomoticleakageafteresophagectomyforesophagealcancerasystematicreview AT tenbroekrichard managementofintrathoracicandcervicalanastomoticleakageafteresophagectomyforesophagealcancerasystematicreview AT siersemapeterd managementofintrathoracicandcervicalanastomoticleakageafteresophagectomyforesophagealcancerasystematicreview AT roversmaroeska managementofintrathoracicandcervicalanastomoticleakageafteresophagectomyforesophagealcancerasystematicreview AT rosmancamiel managementofintrathoracicandcervicalanastomoticleakageafteresophagectomyforesophagealcancerasystematicreview |