Cargando…
RE-AIM Planning and Evaluation Framework: Adapting to New Science and Practice With a 20-Year Review
The RE-AIM planning and evaluation framework was conceptualized two decades ago. As one of the most frequently applied implementation frameworks, RE-AIM has now been cited in over 2,800 publications. This paper describes the application and evolution of RE-AIM as well as lessons learned from its use...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6450067/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30984733 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2019.00064 |
_version_ | 1783408976779542528 |
---|---|
author | Glasgow, Russell E. Harden, Samantha M. Gaglio, Bridget Rabin, Borsika Smith, Matthew Lee Porter, Gwenndolyn C. Ory, Marcia G. Estabrooks, Paul A. |
author_facet | Glasgow, Russell E. Harden, Samantha M. Gaglio, Bridget Rabin, Borsika Smith, Matthew Lee Porter, Gwenndolyn C. Ory, Marcia G. Estabrooks, Paul A. |
author_sort | Glasgow, Russell E. |
collection | PubMed |
description | The RE-AIM planning and evaluation framework was conceptualized two decades ago. As one of the most frequently applied implementation frameworks, RE-AIM has now been cited in over 2,800 publications. This paper describes the application and evolution of RE-AIM as well as lessons learned from its use. RE-AIM has been applied most often in public health and health behavior change research, but increasingly in more diverse content areas and within clinical, community, and corporate settings. We discuss challenges of using RE-AIM while encouraging a more pragmatic use of key dimensions rather than comprehensive applications of all elements. Current foci of RE-AIM include increasing the emphasis on cost and adaptations to programs and expanding the use of qualitative methods to understand “how” and “why” results came about. The framework will continue to evolve to focus on contextual and explanatory factors related to RE-AIM outcomes, package RE-AIM for use by non-researchers, and integrate RE-AIM with other pragmatic and reporting frameworks. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6450067 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-64500672019-04-12 RE-AIM Planning and Evaluation Framework: Adapting to New Science and Practice With a 20-Year Review Glasgow, Russell E. Harden, Samantha M. Gaglio, Bridget Rabin, Borsika Smith, Matthew Lee Porter, Gwenndolyn C. Ory, Marcia G. Estabrooks, Paul A. Front Public Health Public Health The RE-AIM planning and evaluation framework was conceptualized two decades ago. As one of the most frequently applied implementation frameworks, RE-AIM has now been cited in over 2,800 publications. This paper describes the application and evolution of RE-AIM as well as lessons learned from its use. RE-AIM has been applied most often in public health and health behavior change research, but increasingly in more diverse content areas and within clinical, community, and corporate settings. We discuss challenges of using RE-AIM while encouraging a more pragmatic use of key dimensions rather than comprehensive applications of all elements. Current foci of RE-AIM include increasing the emphasis on cost and adaptations to programs and expanding the use of qualitative methods to understand “how” and “why” results came about. The framework will continue to evolve to focus on contextual and explanatory factors related to RE-AIM outcomes, package RE-AIM for use by non-researchers, and integrate RE-AIM with other pragmatic and reporting frameworks. Frontiers Media S.A. 2019-03-29 /pmc/articles/PMC6450067/ /pubmed/30984733 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2019.00064 Text en Copyright © 2019 Glasgow, Harden, Gaglio, Rabin, Smith, Porter, Ory and Estabrooks. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Public Health Glasgow, Russell E. Harden, Samantha M. Gaglio, Bridget Rabin, Borsika Smith, Matthew Lee Porter, Gwenndolyn C. Ory, Marcia G. Estabrooks, Paul A. RE-AIM Planning and Evaluation Framework: Adapting to New Science and Practice With a 20-Year Review |
title | RE-AIM Planning and Evaluation Framework: Adapting to New Science and Practice With a 20-Year Review |
title_full | RE-AIM Planning and Evaluation Framework: Adapting to New Science and Practice With a 20-Year Review |
title_fullStr | RE-AIM Planning and Evaluation Framework: Adapting to New Science and Practice With a 20-Year Review |
title_full_unstemmed | RE-AIM Planning and Evaluation Framework: Adapting to New Science and Practice With a 20-Year Review |
title_short | RE-AIM Planning and Evaluation Framework: Adapting to New Science and Practice With a 20-Year Review |
title_sort | re-aim planning and evaluation framework: adapting to new science and practice with a 20-year review |
topic | Public Health |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6450067/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30984733 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2019.00064 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT glasgowrusselle reaimplanningandevaluationframeworkadaptingtonewscienceandpracticewitha20yearreview AT hardensamantham reaimplanningandevaluationframeworkadaptingtonewscienceandpracticewitha20yearreview AT gagliobridget reaimplanningandevaluationframeworkadaptingtonewscienceandpracticewitha20yearreview AT rabinborsika reaimplanningandevaluationframeworkadaptingtonewscienceandpracticewitha20yearreview AT smithmatthewlee reaimplanningandevaluationframeworkadaptingtonewscienceandpracticewitha20yearreview AT portergwenndolync reaimplanningandevaluationframeworkadaptingtonewscienceandpracticewitha20yearreview AT orymarciag reaimplanningandevaluationframeworkadaptingtonewscienceandpracticewitha20yearreview AT estabrookspaula reaimplanningandevaluationframeworkadaptingtonewscienceandpracticewitha20yearreview |