Cargando…

RE-AIM Planning and Evaluation Framework: Adapting to New Science and Practice With a 20-Year Review

The RE-AIM planning and evaluation framework was conceptualized two decades ago. As one of the most frequently applied implementation frameworks, RE-AIM has now been cited in over 2,800 publications. This paper describes the application and evolution of RE-AIM as well as lessons learned from its use...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Glasgow, Russell E., Harden, Samantha M., Gaglio, Bridget, Rabin, Borsika, Smith, Matthew Lee, Porter, Gwenndolyn C., Ory, Marcia G., Estabrooks, Paul A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6450067/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30984733
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2019.00064
_version_ 1783408976779542528
author Glasgow, Russell E.
Harden, Samantha M.
Gaglio, Bridget
Rabin, Borsika
Smith, Matthew Lee
Porter, Gwenndolyn C.
Ory, Marcia G.
Estabrooks, Paul A.
author_facet Glasgow, Russell E.
Harden, Samantha M.
Gaglio, Bridget
Rabin, Borsika
Smith, Matthew Lee
Porter, Gwenndolyn C.
Ory, Marcia G.
Estabrooks, Paul A.
author_sort Glasgow, Russell E.
collection PubMed
description The RE-AIM planning and evaluation framework was conceptualized two decades ago. As one of the most frequently applied implementation frameworks, RE-AIM has now been cited in over 2,800 publications. This paper describes the application and evolution of RE-AIM as well as lessons learned from its use. RE-AIM has been applied most often in public health and health behavior change research, but increasingly in more diverse content areas and within clinical, community, and corporate settings. We discuss challenges of using RE-AIM while encouraging a more pragmatic use of key dimensions rather than comprehensive applications of all elements. Current foci of RE-AIM include increasing the emphasis on cost and adaptations to programs and expanding the use of qualitative methods to understand “how” and “why” results came about. The framework will continue to evolve to focus on contextual and explanatory factors related to RE-AIM outcomes, package RE-AIM for use by non-researchers, and integrate RE-AIM with other pragmatic and reporting frameworks.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6450067
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64500672019-04-12 RE-AIM Planning and Evaluation Framework: Adapting to New Science and Practice With a 20-Year Review Glasgow, Russell E. Harden, Samantha M. Gaglio, Bridget Rabin, Borsika Smith, Matthew Lee Porter, Gwenndolyn C. Ory, Marcia G. Estabrooks, Paul A. Front Public Health Public Health The RE-AIM planning and evaluation framework was conceptualized two decades ago. As one of the most frequently applied implementation frameworks, RE-AIM has now been cited in over 2,800 publications. This paper describes the application and evolution of RE-AIM as well as lessons learned from its use. RE-AIM has been applied most often in public health and health behavior change research, but increasingly in more diverse content areas and within clinical, community, and corporate settings. We discuss challenges of using RE-AIM while encouraging a more pragmatic use of key dimensions rather than comprehensive applications of all elements. Current foci of RE-AIM include increasing the emphasis on cost and adaptations to programs and expanding the use of qualitative methods to understand “how” and “why” results came about. The framework will continue to evolve to focus on contextual and explanatory factors related to RE-AIM outcomes, package RE-AIM for use by non-researchers, and integrate RE-AIM with other pragmatic and reporting frameworks. Frontiers Media S.A. 2019-03-29 /pmc/articles/PMC6450067/ /pubmed/30984733 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2019.00064 Text en Copyright © 2019 Glasgow, Harden, Gaglio, Rabin, Smith, Porter, Ory and Estabrooks. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Public Health
Glasgow, Russell E.
Harden, Samantha M.
Gaglio, Bridget
Rabin, Borsika
Smith, Matthew Lee
Porter, Gwenndolyn C.
Ory, Marcia G.
Estabrooks, Paul A.
RE-AIM Planning and Evaluation Framework: Adapting to New Science and Practice With a 20-Year Review
title RE-AIM Planning and Evaluation Framework: Adapting to New Science and Practice With a 20-Year Review
title_full RE-AIM Planning and Evaluation Framework: Adapting to New Science and Practice With a 20-Year Review
title_fullStr RE-AIM Planning and Evaluation Framework: Adapting to New Science and Practice With a 20-Year Review
title_full_unstemmed RE-AIM Planning and Evaluation Framework: Adapting to New Science and Practice With a 20-Year Review
title_short RE-AIM Planning and Evaluation Framework: Adapting to New Science and Practice With a 20-Year Review
title_sort re-aim planning and evaluation framework: adapting to new science and practice with a 20-year review
topic Public Health
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6450067/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30984733
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2019.00064
work_keys_str_mv AT glasgowrusselle reaimplanningandevaluationframeworkadaptingtonewscienceandpracticewitha20yearreview
AT hardensamantham reaimplanningandevaluationframeworkadaptingtonewscienceandpracticewitha20yearreview
AT gagliobridget reaimplanningandevaluationframeworkadaptingtonewscienceandpracticewitha20yearreview
AT rabinborsika reaimplanningandevaluationframeworkadaptingtonewscienceandpracticewitha20yearreview
AT smithmatthewlee reaimplanningandevaluationframeworkadaptingtonewscienceandpracticewitha20yearreview
AT portergwenndolync reaimplanningandevaluationframeworkadaptingtonewscienceandpracticewitha20yearreview
AT orymarciag reaimplanningandevaluationframeworkadaptingtonewscienceandpracticewitha20yearreview
AT estabrookspaula reaimplanningandevaluationframeworkadaptingtonewscienceandpracticewitha20yearreview