Cargando…

Effect of paper quality on the response rate to a postal survey: A randomised controlled trial. [ISRCTN32032031]

BACKGROUND: Response rates to surveys are declining and this threatens the validity and generalisability of their findings. We wanted to determine whether paper quality influences the response rate to postal surveys METHODS: A postal questionnaire was sent to all members of the British Society of Gy...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Clark, T Justin, Khan, Khalid S, Gupta, Janesh K
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2001
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC64502/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11782286
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-1-12
_version_ 1782120132820074496
author Clark, T Justin
Khan, Khalid S
Gupta, Janesh K
author_facet Clark, T Justin
Khan, Khalid S
Gupta, Janesh K
author_sort Clark, T Justin
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Response rates to surveys are declining and this threatens the validity and generalisability of their findings. We wanted to determine whether paper quality influences the response rate to postal surveys METHODS: A postal questionnaire was sent to all members of the British Society of Gynaecological Endoscopy (BSGE). Recipients were randomised to receiving the questionnaire printed on standard quality paper or high quality paper. RESULTS: The response rate for the recipients of high quality paper was 43/195 (22%) and 57/194 (29%) for standard quality paper (relative rate of response 0.75, 95% CI 0.33–1.05, p = 0.1 CONCLUSION: The use of high quality paper did not increase response rates to a questionnaire survey of gynaecologists affiliated to an endoscopic society.
format Text
id pubmed-64502
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2001
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-645022002-01-11 Effect of paper quality on the response rate to a postal survey: A randomised controlled trial. [ISRCTN32032031] Clark, T Justin Khan, Khalid S Gupta, Janesh K BMC Med Res Methodol Research Article BACKGROUND: Response rates to surveys are declining and this threatens the validity and generalisability of their findings. We wanted to determine whether paper quality influences the response rate to postal surveys METHODS: A postal questionnaire was sent to all members of the British Society of Gynaecological Endoscopy (BSGE). Recipients were randomised to receiving the questionnaire printed on standard quality paper or high quality paper. RESULTS: The response rate for the recipients of high quality paper was 43/195 (22%) and 57/194 (29%) for standard quality paper (relative rate of response 0.75, 95% CI 0.33–1.05, p = 0.1 CONCLUSION: The use of high quality paper did not increase response rates to a questionnaire survey of gynaecologists affiliated to an endoscopic society. BioMed Central 2001-12-17 /pmc/articles/PMC64502/ /pubmed/11782286 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-1-12 Text en Copyright © 2001 Clark et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article: verbatim copying and redistribution of this article are permitted in all media for any purpose, provided this notice is preserved along with the article's original URL.
spellingShingle Research Article
Clark, T Justin
Khan, Khalid S
Gupta, Janesh K
Effect of paper quality on the response rate to a postal survey: A randomised controlled trial. [ISRCTN32032031]
title Effect of paper quality on the response rate to a postal survey: A randomised controlled trial. [ISRCTN32032031]
title_full Effect of paper quality on the response rate to a postal survey: A randomised controlled trial. [ISRCTN32032031]
title_fullStr Effect of paper quality on the response rate to a postal survey: A randomised controlled trial. [ISRCTN32032031]
title_full_unstemmed Effect of paper quality on the response rate to a postal survey: A randomised controlled trial. [ISRCTN32032031]
title_short Effect of paper quality on the response rate to a postal survey: A randomised controlled trial. [ISRCTN32032031]
title_sort effect of paper quality on the response rate to a postal survey: a randomised controlled trial. [isrctn32032031]
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC64502/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11782286
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-1-12
work_keys_str_mv AT clarktjustin effectofpaperqualityontheresponseratetoapostalsurveyarandomisedcontrolledtrialisrctn32032031
AT khankhalids effectofpaperqualityontheresponseratetoapostalsurveyarandomisedcontrolledtrialisrctn32032031
AT guptajaneshk effectofpaperqualityontheresponseratetoapostalsurveyarandomisedcontrolledtrialisrctn32032031