Cargando…

Comparative evaluation of risk management frameworks for U.S. source waters

The U.S. Safe Drinking Water Act required states to develop source water assessment programs identifying existing and potential contamination sources; however, comprehensive risk prioritization and management approaches for surface water supplies have seen limited application. This participatory stu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Setty, Karen, McConnell, Robert, Raucher, Robert, Bartram, Jamie
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6450437/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31001606
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/aws2.1125
_version_ 1783409022408327168
author Setty, Karen
McConnell, Robert
Raucher, Robert
Bartram, Jamie
author_facet Setty, Karen
McConnell, Robert
Raucher, Robert
Bartram, Jamie
author_sort Setty, Karen
collection PubMed
description The U.S. Safe Drinking Water Act required states to develop source water assessment programs identifying existing and potential contamination sources; however, comprehensive risk prioritization and management approaches for surface water supplies have seen limited application. This participatory study assessed which permutation(s) of risk management frameworks and tools might benefit U.S. utilities by combining a literature review with external utility interviews. Qualitative data provided a basis for categorical assignments of goodness of fit with each of 24 framework evaluation criteria across five categories. Weighted integration using stakeholder input provided a relative ranking of applicability, later validated at a decision‐making workshop. Hybridization of the American National Standards Institute/American Water Works Association (ANSI/AWWA G300) source water protection standard and World Health Organization Water Safety Plan guidance was recommended to develop a comprehensive risk management approach for U.S. source waters. Cost–benefit components of other guidance materials were recommended to incorporate financial considerations into risk ranking and mitigation decisions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6450437
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64504372019-04-16 Comparative evaluation of risk management frameworks for U.S. source waters Setty, Karen McConnell, Robert Raucher, Robert Bartram, Jamie AWWA Water Sci Original Research The U.S. Safe Drinking Water Act required states to develop source water assessment programs identifying existing and potential contamination sources; however, comprehensive risk prioritization and management approaches for surface water supplies have seen limited application. This participatory study assessed which permutation(s) of risk management frameworks and tools might benefit U.S. utilities by combining a literature review with external utility interviews. Qualitative data provided a basis for categorical assignments of goodness of fit with each of 24 framework evaluation criteria across five categories. Weighted integration using stakeholder input provided a relative ranking of applicability, later validated at a decision‐making workshop. Hybridization of the American National Standards Institute/American Water Works Association (ANSI/AWWA G300) source water protection standard and World Health Organization Water Safety Plan guidance was recommended to develop a comprehensive risk management approach for U.S. source waters. Cost–benefit components of other guidance materials were recommended to incorporate financial considerations into risk ranking and mitigation decisions. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2019-02-19 2019 /pmc/articles/PMC6450437/ /pubmed/31001606 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/aws2.1125 Text en © 2019 The Authors. AWWA Water Science published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Water Works Association This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Setty, Karen
McConnell, Robert
Raucher, Robert
Bartram, Jamie
Comparative evaluation of risk management frameworks for U.S. source waters
title Comparative evaluation of risk management frameworks for U.S. source waters
title_full Comparative evaluation of risk management frameworks for U.S. source waters
title_fullStr Comparative evaluation of risk management frameworks for U.S. source waters
title_full_unstemmed Comparative evaluation of risk management frameworks for U.S. source waters
title_short Comparative evaluation of risk management frameworks for U.S. source waters
title_sort comparative evaluation of risk management frameworks for u.s. source waters
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6450437/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31001606
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/aws2.1125
work_keys_str_mv AT settykaren comparativeevaluationofriskmanagementframeworksforussourcewaters
AT mcconnellrobert comparativeevaluationofriskmanagementframeworksforussourcewaters
AT raucherrobert comparativeevaluationofriskmanagementframeworksforussourcewaters
AT bartramjamie comparativeevaluationofriskmanagementframeworksforussourcewaters