Cargando…
Comparative evaluation of risk management frameworks for U.S. source waters
The U.S. Safe Drinking Water Act required states to develop source water assessment programs identifying existing and potential contamination sources; however, comprehensive risk prioritization and management approaches for surface water supplies have seen limited application. This participatory stu...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6450437/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31001606 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/aws2.1125 |
_version_ | 1783409022408327168 |
---|---|
author | Setty, Karen McConnell, Robert Raucher, Robert Bartram, Jamie |
author_facet | Setty, Karen McConnell, Robert Raucher, Robert Bartram, Jamie |
author_sort | Setty, Karen |
collection | PubMed |
description | The U.S. Safe Drinking Water Act required states to develop source water assessment programs identifying existing and potential contamination sources; however, comprehensive risk prioritization and management approaches for surface water supplies have seen limited application. This participatory study assessed which permutation(s) of risk management frameworks and tools might benefit U.S. utilities by combining a literature review with external utility interviews. Qualitative data provided a basis for categorical assignments of goodness of fit with each of 24 framework evaluation criteria across five categories. Weighted integration using stakeholder input provided a relative ranking of applicability, later validated at a decision‐making workshop. Hybridization of the American National Standards Institute/American Water Works Association (ANSI/AWWA G300) source water protection standard and World Health Organization Water Safety Plan guidance was recommended to develop a comprehensive risk management approach for U.S. source waters. Cost–benefit components of other guidance materials were recommended to incorporate financial considerations into risk ranking and mitigation decisions. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6450437 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | John Wiley & Sons, Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-64504372019-04-16 Comparative evaluation of risk management frameworks for U.S. source waters Setty, Karen McConnell, Robert Raucher, Robert Bartram, Jamie AWWA Water Sci Original Research The U.S. Safe Drinking Water Act required states to develop source water assessment programs identifying existing and potential contamination sources; however, comprehensive risk prioritization and management approaches for surface water supplies have seen limited application. This participatory study assessed which permutation(s) of risk management frameworks and tools might benefit U.S. utilities by combining a literature review with external utility interviews. Qualitative data provided a basis for categorical assignments of goodness of fit with each of 24 framework evaluation criteria across five categories. Weighted integration using stakeholder input provided a relative ranking of applicability, later validated at a decision‐making workshop. Hybridization of the American National Standards Institute/American Water Works Association (ANSI/AWWA G300) source water protection standard and World Health Organization Water Safety Plan guidance was recommended to develop a comprehensive risk management approach for U.S. source waters. Cost–benefit components of other guidance materials were recommended to incorporate financial considerations into risk ranking and mitigation decisions. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2019-02-19 2019 /pmc/articles/PMC6450437/ /pubmed/31001606 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/aws2.1125 Text en © 2019 The Authors. AWWA Water Science published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Water Works Association This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Setty, Karen McConnell, Robert Raucher, Robert Bartram, Jamie Comparative evaluation of risk management frameworks for U.S. source waters |
title | Comparative evaluation of risk management frameworks for U.S. source waters |
title_full | Comparative evaluation of risk management frameworks for U.S. source waters |
title_fullStr | Comparative evaluation of risk management frameworks for U.S. source waters |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparative evaluation of risk management frameworks for U.S. source waters |
title_short | Comparative evaluation of risk management frameworks for U.S. source waters |
title_sort | comparative evaluation of risk management frameworks for u.s. source waters |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6450437/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31001606 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/aws2.1125 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT settykaren comparativeevaluationofriskmanagementframeworksforussourcewaters AT mcconnellrobert comparativeevaluationofriskmanagementframeworksforussourcewaters AT raucherrobert comparativeevaluationofriskmanagementframeworksforussourcewaters AT bartramjamie comparativeevaluationofriskmanagementframeworksforussourcewaters |