Cargando…
Scientific Integrity Principles and Best Practices: Recommendations from a Scientific Integrity Consortium
A Scientific Integrity Consortium developed a set of recommended principles and best practices that can be used broadly across scientific disciplines as a mechanism for consensus on scientific integrity standards and to better equip scientists to operate in a rapidly changing research environment. T...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Netherlands
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6450850/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30810892 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11948-019-00094-3 |
_version_ | 1783409078976905216 |
---|---|
author | Kretser, Alison Murphy, Delia Bertuzzi, Stefano Abraham, Todd Allison, David B. Boor, Kathryn J. Dwyer, Johanna Grantham, Andrea Harris, Linda J. Hollander, Rachelle Jacobs-Young, Chavonda Rovito, Sarah Vafiadis, Dorothea Woteki, Catherine Wyndham, Jessica Yada, Rickey |
author_facet | Kretser, Alison Murphy, Delia Bertuzzi, Stefano Abraham, Todd Allison, David B. Boor, Kathryn J. Dwyer, Johanna Grantham, Andrea Harris, Linda J. Hollander, Rachelle Jacobs-Young, Chavonda Rovito, Sarah Vafiadis, Dorothea Woteki, Catherine Wyndham, Jessica Yada, Rickey |
author_sort | Kretser, Alison |
collection | PubMed |
description | A Scientific Integrity Consortium developed a set of recommended principles and best practices that can be used broadly across scientific disciplines as a mechanism for consensus on scientific integrity standards and to better equip scientists to operate in a rapidly changing research environment. The two principles that represent the umbrella under which scientific processes should operate are as follows: (1) Foster a culture of integrity in the scientific process. (2) Evidence-based policy interests may have legitimate roles to play in influencing aspects of the research process, but those roles should not interfere with scientific integrity. The nine best practices for instilling scientific integrity in the implementation of these two overarching principles are (1) Require universal training in robust scientific methods, in the use of appropriate experimental design and statistics, and in responsible research practices for scientists at all levels, with the training content regularly updated and presented by qualified scientists. (2) Strengthen scientific integrity oversight and processes throughout the research continuum with a focus on training in ethics and conduct. (3) Encourage reproducibility of research through transparency. (4) Strive to establish open science as the standard operating procedure throughout the scientific enterprise. (5) Develop and implement educational tools to teach communication skills that uphold scientific integrity. (6) Strive to identify ways to further strengthen the peer review process. (7) Encourage scientific journals to publish unanticipated findings that meet standards of quality and scientific integrity. (8) Seek harmonization and implementation among journals of rapid, consistent, and transparent processes for correction and/or retraction of published papers. (9) Design rigorous and comprehensive evaluation criteria that recognize and reward the highest standards of integrity in scientific research. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6450850 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Springer Netherlands |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-64508502019-04-17 Scientific Integrity Principles and Best Practices: Recommendations from a Scientific Integrity Consortium Kretser, Alison Murphy, Delia Bertuzzi, Stefano Abraham, Todd Allison, David B. Boor, Kathryn J. Dwyer, Johanna Grantham, Andrea Harris, Linda J. Hollander, Rachelle Jacobs-Young, Chavonda Rovito, Sarah Vafiadis, Dorothea Woteki, Catherine Wyndham, Jessica Yada, Rickey Sci Eng Ethics Consortium Statement A Scientific Integrity Consortium developed a set of recommended principles and best practices that can be used broadly across scientific disciplines as a mechanism for consensus on scientific integrity standards and to better equip scientists to operate in a rapidly changing research environment. The two principles that represent the umbrella under which scientific processes should operate are as follows: (1) Foster a culture of integrity in the scientific process. (2) Evidence-based policy interests may have legitimate roles to play in influencing aspects of the research process, but those roles should not interfere with scientific integrity. The nine best practices for instilling scientific integrity in the implementation of these two overarching principles are (1) Require universal training in robust scientific methods, in the use of appropriate experimental design and statistics, and in responsible research practices for scientists at all levels, with the training content regularly updated and presented by qualified scientists. (2) Strengthen scientific integrity oversight and processes throughout the research continuum with a focus on training in ethics and conduct. (3) Encourage reproducibility of research through transparency. (4) Strive to establish open science as the standard operating procedure throughout the scientific enterprise. (5) Develop and implement educational tools to teach communication skills that uphold scientific integrity. (6) Strive to identify ways to further strengthen the peer review process. (7) Encourage scientific journals to publish unanticipated findings that meet standards of quality and scientific integrity. (8) Seek harmonization and implementation among journals of rapid, consistent, and transparent processes for correction and/or retraction of published papers. (9) Design rigorous and comprehensive evaluation criteria that recognize and reward the highest standards of integrity in scientific research. Springer Netherlands 2019-02-27 2019 /pmc/articles/PMC6450850/ /pubmed/30810892 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11948-019-00094-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Consortium Statement Kretser, Alison Murphy, Delia Bertuzzi, Stefano Abraham, Todd Allison, David B. Boor, Kathryn J. Dwyer, Johanna Grantham, Andrea Harris, Linda J. Hollander, Rachelle Jacobs-Young, Chavonda Rovito, Sarah Vafiadis, Dorothea Woteki, Catherine Wyndham, Jessica Yada, Rickey Scientific Integrity Principles and Best Practices: Recommendations from a Scientific Integrity Consortium |
title | Scientific Integrity Principles and Best Practices: Recommendations from a Scientific Integrity Consortium |
title_full | Scientific Integrity Principles and Best Practices: Recommendations from a Scientific Integrity Consortium |
title_fullStr | Scientific Integrity Principles and Best Practices: Recommendations from a Scientific Integrity Consortium |
title_full_unstemmed | Scientific Integrity Principles and Best Practices: Recommendations from a Scientific Integrity Consortium |
title_short | Scientific Integrity Principles and Best Practices: Recommendations from a Scientific Integrity Consortium |
title_sort | scientific integrity principles and best practices: recommendations from a scientific integrity consortium |
topic | Consortium Statement |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6450850/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30810892 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11948-019-00094-3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kretseralison scientificintegrityprinciplesandbestpracticesrecommendationsfromascientificintegrityconsortium AT murphydelia scientificintegrityprinciplesandbestpracticesrecommendationsfromascientificintegrityconsortium AT bertuzzistefano scientificintegrityprinciplesandbestpracticesrecommendationsfromascientificintegrityconsortium AT abrahamtodd scientificintegrityprinciplesandbestpracticesrecommendationsfromascientificintegrityconsortium AT allisondavidb scientificintegrityprinciplesandbestpracticesrecommendationsfromascientificintegrityconsortium AT boorkathrynj scientificintegrityprinciplesandbestpracticesrecommendationsfromascientificintegrityconsortium AT dwyerjohanna scientificintegrityprinciplesandbestpracticesrecommendationsfromascientificintegrityconsortium AT granthamandrea scientificintegrityprinciplesandbestpracticesrecommendationsfromascientificintegrityconsortium AT harrislindaj scientificintegrityprinciplesandbestpracticesrecommendationsfromascientificintegrityconsortium AT hollanderrachelle scientificintegrityprinciplesandbestpracticesrecommendationsfromascientificintegrityconsortium AT jacobsyoungchavonda scientificintegrityprinciplesandbestpracticesrecommendationsfromascientificintegrityconsortium AT rovitosarah scientificintegrityprinciplesandbestpracticesrecommendationsfromascientificintegrityconsortium AT vafiadisdorothea scientificintegrityprinciplesandbestpracticesrecommendationsfromascientificintegrityconsortium AT wotekicatherine scientificintegrityprinciplesandbestpracticesrecommendationsfromascientificintegrityconsortium AT wyndhamjessica scientificintegrityprinciplesandbestpracticesrecommendationsfromascientificintegrityconsortium AT yadarickey scientificintegrityprinciplesandbestpracticesrecommendationsfromascientificintegrityconsortium |