Cargando…

Scientific Integrity Principles and Best Practices: Recommendations from a Scientific Integrity Consortium

A Scientific Integrity Consortium developed a set of recommended principles and best practices that can be used broadly across scientific disciplines as a mechanism for consensus on scientific integrity standards and to better equip scientists to operate in a rapidly changing research environment. T...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kretser, Alison, Murphy, Delia, Bertuzzi, Stefano, Abraham, Todd, Allison, David B., Boor, Kathryn J., Dwyer, Johanna, Grantham, Andrea, Harris, Linda J., Hollander, Rachelle, Jacobs-Young, Chavonda, Rovito, Sarah, Vafiadis, Dorothea, Woteki, Catherine, Wyndham, Jessica, Yada, Rickey
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Netherlands 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6450850/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30810892
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11948-019-00094-3
_version_ 1783409078976905216
author Kretser, Alison
Murphy, Delia
Bertuzzi, Stefano
Abraham, Todd
Allison, David B.
Boor, Kathryn J.
Dwyer, Johanna
Grantham, Andrea
Harris, Linda J.
Hollander, Rachelle
Jacobs-Young, Chavonda
Rovito, Sarah
Vafiadis, Dorothea
Woteki, Catherine
Wyndham, Jessica
Yada, Rickey
author_facet Kretser, Alison
Murphy, Delia
Bertuzzi, Stefano
Abraham, Todd
Allison, David B.
Boor, Kathryn J.
Dwyer, Johanna
Grantham, Andrea
Harris, Linda J.
Hollander, Rachelle
Jacobs-Young, Chavonda
Rovito, Sarah
Vafiadis, Dorothea
Woteki, Catherine
Wyndham, Jessica
Yada, Rickey
author_sort Kretser, Alison
collection PubMed
description A Scientific Integrity Consortium developed a set of recommended principles and best practices that can be used broadly across scientific disciplines as a mechanism for consensus on scientific integrity standards and to better equip scientists to operate in a rapidly changing research environment. The two principles that represent the umbrella under which scientific processes should operate are as follows: (1) Foster a culture of integrity in the scientific process. (2) Evidence-based policy interests may have legitimate roles to play in influencing aspects of the research process, but those roles should not interfere with scientific integrity. The nine best practices for instilling scientific integrity in the implementation of these two overarching principles are (1) Require universal training in robust scientific methods, in the use of appropriate experimental design and statistics, and in responsible research practices for scientists at all levels, with the training content regularly updated and presented by qualified scientists. (2) Strengthen scientific integrity oversight and processes throughout the research continuum with a focus on training in ethics and conduct. (3) Encourage reproducibility of research through transparency. (4) Strive to establish open science as the standard operating procedure throughout the scientific enterprise. (5) Develop and implement educational tools to teach communication skills that uphold scientific integrity. (6) Strive to identify ways to further strengthen the peer review process. (7) Encourage scientific journals to publish unanticipated findings that meet standards of quality and scientific integrity. (8) Seek harmonization and implementation among journals of rapid, consistent, and transparent processes for correction and/or retraction of published papers. (9) Design rigorous and comprehensive evaluation criteria that recognize and reward the highest standards of integrity in scientific research.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6450850
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Springer Netherlands
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64508502019-04-17 Scientific Integrity Principles and Best Practices: Recommendations from a Scientific Integrity Consortium Kretser, Alison Murphy, Delia Bertuzzi, Stefano Abraham, Todd Allison, David B. Boor, Kathryn J. Dwyer, Johanna Grantham, Andrea Harris, Linda J. Hollander, Rachelle Jacobs-Young, Chavonda Rovito, Sarah Vafiadis, Dorothea Woteki, Catherine Wyndham, Jessica Yada, Rickey Sci Eng Ethics Consortium Statement A Scientific Integrity Consortium developed a set of recommended principles and best practices that can be used broadly across scientific disciplines as a mechanism for consensus on scientific integrity standards and to better equip scientists to operate in a rapidly changing research environment. The two principles that represent the umbrella under which scientific processes should operate are as follows: (1) Foster a culture of integrity in the scientific process. (2) Evidence-based policy interests may have legitimate roles to play in influencing aspects of the research process, but those roles should not interfere with scientific integrity. The nine best practices for instilling scientific integrity in the implementation of these two overarching principles are (1) Require universal training in robust scientific methods, in the use of appropriate experimental design and statistics, and in responsible research practices for scientists at all levels, with the training content regularly updated and presented by qualified scientists. (2) Strengthen scientific integrity oversight and processes throughout the research continuum with a focus on training in ethics and conduct. (3) Encourage reproducibility of research through transparency. (4) Strive to establish open science as the standard operating procedure throughout the scientific enterprise. (5) Develop and implement educational tools to teach communication skills that uphold scientific integrity. (6) Strive to identify ways to further strengthen the peer review process. (7) Encourage scientific journals to publish unanticipated findings that meet standards of quality and scientific integrity. (8) Seek harmonization and implementation among journals of rapid, consistent, and transparent processes for correction and/or retraction of published papers. (9) Design rigorous and comprehensive evaluation criteria that recognize and reward the highest standards of integrity in scientific research. Springer Netherlands 2019-02-27 2019 /pmc/articles/PMC6450850/ /pubmed/30810892 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11948-019-00094-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Consortium Statement
Kretser, Alison
Murphy, Delia
Bertuzzi, Stefano
Abraham, Todd
Allison, David B.
Boor, Kathryn J.
Dwyer, Johanna
Grantham, Andrea
Harris, Linda J.
Hollander, Rachelle
Jacobs-Young, Chavonda
Rovito, Sarah
Vafiadis, Dorothea
Woteki, Catherine
Wyndham, Jessica
Yada, Rickey
Scientific Integrity Principles and Best Practices: Recommendations from a Scientific Integrity Consortium
title Scientific Integrity Principles and Best Practices: Recommendations from a Scientific Integrity Consortium
title_full Scientific Integrity Principles and Best Practices: Recommendations from a Scientific Integrity Consortium
title_fullStr Scientific Integrity Principles and Best Practices: Recommendations from a Scientific Integrity Consortium
title_full_unstemmed Scientific Integrity Principles and Best Practices: Recommendations from a Scientific Integrity Consortium
title_short Scientific Integrity Principles and Best Practices: Recommendations from a Scientific Integrity Consortium
title_sort scientific integrity principles and best practices: recommendations from a scientific integrity consortium
topic Consortium Statement
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6450850/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30810892
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11948-019-00094-3
work_keys_str_mv AT kretseralison scientificintegrityprinciplesandbestpracticesrecommendationsfromascientificintegrityconsortium
AT murphydelia scientificintegrityprinciplesandbestpracticesrecommendationsfromascientificintegrityconsortium
AT bertuzzistefano scientificintegrityprinciplesandbestpracticesrecommendationsfromascientificintegrityconsortium
AT abrahamtodd scientificintegrityprinciplesandbestpracticesrecommendationsfromascientificintegrityconsortium
AT allisondavidb scientificintegrityprinciplesandbestpracticesrecommendationsfromascientificintegrityconsortium
AT boorkathrynj scientificintegrityprinciplesandbestpracticesrecommendationsfromascientificintegrityconsortium
AT dwyerjohanna scientificintegrityprinciplesandbestpracticesrecommendationsfromascientificintegrityconsortium
AT granthamandrea scientificintegrityprinciplesandbestpracticesrecommendationsfromascientificintegrityconsortium
AT harrislindaj scientificintegrityprinciplesandbestpracticesrecommendationsfromascientificintegrityconsortium
AT hollanderrachelle scientificintegrityprinciplesandbestpracticesrecommendationsfromascientificintegrityconsortium
AT jacobsyoungchavonda scientificintegrityprinciplesandbestpracticesrecommendationsfromascientificintegrityconsortium
AT rovitosarah scientificintegrityprinciplesandbestpracticesrecommendationsfromascientificintegrityconsortium
AT vafiadisdorothea scientificintegrityprinciplesandbestpracticesrecommendationsfromascientificintegrityconsortium
AT wotekicatherine scientificintegrityprinciplesandbestpracticesrecommendationsfromascientificintegrityconsortium
AT wyndhamjessica scientificintegrityprinciplesandbestpracticesrecommendationsfromascientificintegrityconsortium
AT yadarickey scientificintegrityprinciplesandbestpracticesrecommendationsfromascientificintegrityconsortium