Cargando…

A family case of X-linked Alport syndrome patients with a novel variant in COL4A5

We herein report 2 Japanese patients with X-linked Alport syndrome (XLAS), with a novel variant in COL4A5. Patient 1 was a 16-year-old Japanese girl with a history of microscopic hematuria, without proteinuria, renal dysfunction, deafness, or ocular abnormalities. At 13 years of age, renal biopsy wa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kashiwagi, Yasuyo, Suzuki, Shinji, Agata, Kazushi, Morishima, Yasuyuki, Inagaki, Natsuko, Numabe, Hironao, Kawashima, Hisashi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Singapore 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6450996/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30293132
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13730-018-0368-4
Descripción
Sumario:We herein report 2 Japanese patients with X-linked Alport syndrome (XLAS), with a novel variant in COL4A5. Patient 1 was a 16-year-old Japanese girl with a history of microscopic hematuria, without proteinuria, renal dysfunction, deafness, or ocular abnormalities. At 13 years of age, renal biopsy was performed; however, a diagnosis of AS was not considered. When her mother (patient 2) was 40 years of age (3 years after patient 1 underwent a renal biopsy), patient 2 was found to have asymptomatic hematuria, proteinuria, and an increased serum creatinine level, without deafness and ocular abnormalities. Subsequently, immunofluorescence staining for alpha 5 chains of type IV collagen was performed in patient 1. Pathological findings were consistent with AS, and genetic analysis demonstrated that both patients had a heterozygous mutation in COL4A5 (NM_000495.4: exon41:c.C3769T: p.Q1257X). To date, more than 900 different COL4A5 mutations have been identified; however, this variant has not been previously described. Physicians have to consider AS when they perform a renal biopsy in all patients with hematuria despite absent/present of family history, hearing loss, and ocular abnormality. Especially, when findings of light microscopy and immunofluorescence microscope are unclear, it should be considered carefully. Electron microscopy findings are very important.