Cargando…

Efficacy of an incentive intervention on secondary prophylaxis for young people with rheumatic fever: a multiple baseline study

BACKGROUND: Acute rheumatic fever in New Zealand persists and is a barometer of equity as its burden almost exclusively falls on Māori and Pacific Island populations. The primary objective of this study is to determine whether an incentive programme will result in increased secondary prophylaxis inj...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Oetzel, John G., Lao, Chunhuan, Morley, Michelle, Penman, Kathy, Child, Maree, Scott, Nina, Karalus, Miina
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6451207/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30953495
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-019-6695-3
_version_ 1783409150245470208
author Oetzel, John G.
Lao, Chunhuan
Morley, Michelle
Penman, Kathy
Child, Maree
Scott, Nina
Karalus, Miina
author_facet Oetzel, John G.
Lao, Chunhuan
Morley, Michelle
Penman, Kathy
Child, Maree
Scott, Nina
Karalus, Miina
author_sort Oetzel, John G.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Acute rheumatic fever in New Zealand persists and is a barometer of equity as its burden almost exclusively falls on Māori and Pacific Island populations. The primary objective of this study is to determine whether an incentive programme will result in increased secondary prophylaxis injections over a one-year period compared to a baseline period prior to the intervention. METHODS: The evaluation used a multiple baseline study to determine whether an incentive consisting of a mobile phone and monthly “top-up” (for data/calls) resulted in increased injections, increased texts/calls with nurses, reduced number of visits to get a successful injection, less medicine wasted, and increased nurse satisfaction. Participants were 77 young people (aged 14–21) on an acute rheumatic fever registry in Waikato region, New Zealand classified as either fully adherent (all injections received and no more than one late) or partially adherent based on injections at baseline. RESULTS: There was a sharp increase in injections for intermittent patients post-intervention and then a slight decrease overtime, while fully adherent patients maintained their high rate of injections (p = .003). A similar pattern for nurse satisfaction emerged (p = .001). The number of calls/texts increased for all patients (p = .003). The number of visits went down for partially adherent patients and up for fully adherent patients (p = .012). The overall incremental cost-effectiveness was $989 per extra successful injection although costs increased sharply toward the end of the intervention. CONCLUSIONS: Incentivising secondary prophylaxis appears to have a strong impact for partially adherent patients, particularly during the early periods following the initiation of the intervention. Enhancing communication with patients who returned to care may result in more sustainable adherence. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Retrospectively registered: Australia New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN12618001150235, 12 July 2018.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6451207
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64512072019-04-16 Efficacy of an incentive intervention on secondary prophylaxis for young people with rheumatic fever: a multiple baseline study Oetzel, John G. Lao, Chunhuan Morley, Michelle Penman, Kathy Child, Maree Scott, Nina Karalus, Miina BMC Public Health Research Article BACKGROUND: Acute rheumatic fever in New Zealand persists and is a barometer of equity as its burden almost exclusively falls on Māori and Pacific Island populations. The primary objective of this study is to determine whether an incentive programme will result in increased secondary prophylaxis injections over a one-year period compared to a baseline period prior to the intervention. METHODS: The evaluation used a multiple baseline study to determine whether an incentive consisting of a mobile phone and monthly “top-up” (for data/calls) resulted in increased injections, increased texts/calls with nurses, reduced number of visits to get a successful injection, less medicine wasted, and increased nurse satisfaction. Participants were 77 young people (aged 14–21) on an acute rheumatic fever registry in Waikato region, New Zealand classified as either fully adherent (all injections received and no more than one late) or partially adherent based on injections at baseline. RESULTS: There was a sharp increase in injections for intermittent patients post-intervention and then a slight decrease overtime, while fully adherent patients maintained their high rate of injections (p = .003). A similar pattern for nurse satisfaction emerged (p = .001). The number of calls/texts increased for all patients (p = .003). The number of visits went down for partially adherent patients and up for fully adherent patients (p = .012). The overall incremental cost-effectiveness was $989 per extra successful injection although costs increased sharply toward the end of the intervention. CONCLUSIONS: Incentivising secondary prophylaxis appears to have a strong impact for partially adherent patients, particularly during the early periods following the initiation of the intervention. Enhancing communication with patients who returned to care may result in more sustainable adherence. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Retrospectively registered: Australia New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN12618001150235, 12 July 2018. BioMed Central 2019-04-05 /pmc/articles/PMC6451207/ /pubmed/30953495 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-019-6695-3 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Oetzel, John G.
Lao, Chunhuan
Morley, Michelle
Penman, Kathy
Child, Maree
Scott, Nina
Karalus, Miina
Efficacy of an incentive intervention on secondary prophylaxis for young people with rheumatic fever: a multiple baseline study
title Efficacy of an incentive intervention on secondary prophylaxis for young people with rheumatic fever: a multiple baseline study
title_full Efficacy of an incentive intervention on secondary prophylaxis for young people with rheumatic fever: a multiple baseline study
title_fullStr Efficacy of an incentive intervention on secondary prophylaxis for young people with rheumatic fever: a multiple baseline study
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy of an incentive intervention on secondary prophylaxis for young people with rheumatic fever: a multiple baseline study
title_short Efficacy of an incentive intervention on secondary prophylaxis for young people with rheumatic fever: a multiple baseline study
title_sort efficacy of an incentive intervention on secondary prophylaxis for young people with rheumatic fever: a multiple baseline study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6451207/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30953495
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-019-6695-3
work_keys_str_mv AT oetzeljohng efficacyofanincentiveinterventiononsecondaryprophylaxisforyoungpeoplewithrheumaticfeveramultiplebaselinestudy
AT laochunhuan efficacyofanincentiveinterventiononsecondaryprophylaxisforyoungpeoplewithrheumaticfeveramultiplebaselinestudy
AT morleymichelle efficacyofanincentiveinterventiononsecondaryprophylaxisforyoungpeoplewithrheumaticfeveramultiplebaselinestudy
AT penmankathy efficacyofanincentiveinterventiononsecondaryprophylaxisforyoungpeoplewithrheumaticfeveramultiplebaselinestudy
AT childmaree efficacyofanincentiveinterventiononsecondaryprophylaxisforyoungpeoplewithrheumaticfeveramultiplebaselinestudy
AT scottnina efficacyofanincentiveinterventiononsecondaryprophylaxisforyoungpeoplewithrheumaticfeveramultiplebaselinestudy
AT karalusmiina efficacyofanincentiveinterventiononsecondaryprophylaxisforyoungpeoplewithrheumaticfeveramultiplebaselinestudy