Cargando…

Computational enhancer prediction: evaluation and improvements

BACKGROUND: Identifying transcriptional enhancers and other cis-regulatory modules (CRMs) is an important goal of post-sequencing genome annotation. Computational approaches provide a useful complement to empirical methods for CRM discovery, but it is critical that we develop effective means to eval...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Asma, Hasiba, Halfon, Marc S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6451241/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30953451
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12859-019-2781-x
_version_ 1783409158172704768
author Asma, Hasiba
Halfon, Marc S.
author_facet Asma, Hasiba
Halfon, Marc S.
author_sort Asma, Hasiba
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Identifying transcriptional enhancers and other cis-regulatory modules (CRMs) is an important goal of post-sequencing genome annotation. Computational approaches provide a useful complement to empirical methods for CRM discovery, but it is critical that we develop effective means to evaluate their performance in terms of estimating their sensitivity and specificity. RESULTS: We introduce here pCRMeval, a pipeline for in silico evaluation of any enhancer prediction tools that are flexible enough to be applied to the Drosophila melanogaster genome. pCRMeval compares the result of predictions with the extensive existing knowledge of experimentally-validated Drosophila CRMs in order to estimate the precision and relative sensitivity of the prediction method. In the case of supervised prediction methods—when training data composed of validated CRMs are used—pCRMeval can also assess the sensitivity of specific training sets. We demonstrate the utility of pCRMeval through evaluation of our SCRMshaw CRM prediction method and training data. By measuring the impact of different parameters on SCRMshaw performance, as assessed by pCRMeval, we develop a more robust version of SCRMshaw, SCRMshaw_HD, that improves the number of predictions while maintaining sensitivity and specificity. Our analysis also demonstrates that SCRMshaw_HD, when applied to increasingly less well-assembled genomes, maintains its strong predictive power with only a minor drop-off in performance. CONCLUSION: Our pCRMeval pipeline provides a general framework for evaluation that can be applied to any CRM prediction method, particularly a supervised method. While we make use of it here primarily to test and improve a particular method for CRM prediction, SCRMshaw, pCRMeval should provide a valuable platform to the research community not only for evaluating individual methods, but also for comparing between competing methods. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12859-019-2781-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6451241
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64512412019-04-16 Computational enhancer prediction: evaluation and improvements Asma, Hasiba Halfon, Marc S. BMC Bioinformatics Methodology Article BACKGROUND: Identifying transcriptional enhancers and other cis-regulatory modules (CRMs) is an important goal of post-sequencing genome annotation. Computational approaches provide a useful complement to empirical methods for CRM discovery, but it is critical that we develop effective means to evaluate their performance in terms of estimating their sensitivity and specificity. RESULTS: We introduce here pCRMeval, a pipeline for in silico evaluation of any enhancer prediction tools that are flexible enough to be applied to the Drosophila melanogaster genome. pCRMeval compares the result of predictions with the extensive existing knowledge of experimentally-validated Drosophila CRMs in order to estimate the precision and relative sensitivity of the prediction method. In the case of supervised prediction methods—when training data composed of validated CRMs are used—pCRMeval can also assess the sensitivity of specific training sets. We demonstrate the utility of pCRMeval through evaluation of our SCRMshaw CRM prediction method and training data. By measuring the impact of different parameters on SCRMshaw performance, as assessed by pCRMeval, we develop a more robust version of SCRMshaw, SCRMshaw_HD, that improves the number of predictions while maintaining sensitivity and specificity. Our analysis also demonstrates that SCRMshaw_HD, when applied to increasingly less well-assembled genomes, maintains its strong predictive power with only a minor drop-off in performance. CONCLUSION: Our pCRMeval pipeline provides a general framework for evaluation that can be applied to any CRM prediction method, particularly a supervised method. While we make use of it here primarily to test and improve a particular method for CRM prediction, SCRMshaw, pCRMeval should provide a valuable platform to the research community not only for evaluating individual methods, but also for comparing between competing methods. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12859-019-2781-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2019-04-05 /pmc/articles/PMC6451241/ /pubmed/30953451 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12859-019-2781-x Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Methodology Article
Asma, Hasiba
Halfon, Marc S.
Computational enhancer prediction: evaluation and improvements
title Computational enhancer prediction: evaluation and improvements
title_full Computational enhancer prediction: evaluation and improvements
title_fullStr Computational enhancer prediction: evaluation and improvements
title_full_unstemmed Computational enhancer prediction: evaluation and improvements
title_short Computational enhancer prediction: evaluation and improvements
title_sort computational enhancer prediction: evaluation and improvements
topic Methodology Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6451241/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30953451
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12859-019-2781-x
work_keys_str_mv AT asmahasiba computationalenhancerpredictionevaluationandimprovements
AT halfonmarcs computationalenhancerpredictionevaluationandimprovements