Cargando…
Assessments of attrition bias in Cochrane systematic reviews are highly inconsistent and thus hindering trial comparability
BACKGROUND: An important part of the systematic review methodology is appraisal of the risk of bias in included studies. Cochrane systematic reviews are considered golden standard regarding systematic review methodology, but Cochrane’s instructions for assessing risk of attrition bias are vague, whi...
Autores principales: | Babic, Andrija, Tokalic, Ruzica, Amílcar Silva Cunha, João, Novak, Ivana, Suto, Jelena, Vidak, Marin, Miosic, Ivana, Vuka, Ivana, Poklepovic Pericic, Tina, Puljak, Livia |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6451283/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30953448 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-019-0717-9 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Risk of bias judgments for random sequence generation in Cochrane systematic reviews were frequently not in line with Cochrane Handbook
por: Barcot, Ognjen, et al.
Publicado: (2019) -
Adequacy of risk of bias assessment in surgical vs non-surgical trials in Cochrane reviews: a methodological study
por: Barcot, Ognjen, et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
The judgement of biases included in the category “other bias” in Cochrane systematic reviews of interventions: a systematic survey
por: Babic, Andrija, et al.
Publicado: (2019) -
Conclusiveness, linguistic characteristics and readability of Cochrane plain language summaries of intervention reviews: a cross-sectional study
por: Banić, Aleksandra, et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
Cognitive levels in testing knowledge in evidence-based medicine: a cross sectional study
por: Buljan, Ivan, et al.
Publicado: (2021)