Cargando…

Challenges in assessing the sunscreen‐melanoma association

Whether sunscreen use affects melanoma risk has been widely studied with contradictory results. To answer this question we performed a systematic review of all published studies, accounting for sources of heterogeneity and bias. We searched for original articles investigating the sunscreen‐melanoma...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rueegg, Corina S., Stenehjem, Jo S., Egger, Matthias, Ghiasvand, Reza, Cho, Eunyoung, Lund, Eiliv, Weiderpass, Elisabete, Green, Adele C., Veierød, Marit B.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6451658/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30447006
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ijc.31997
_version_ 1783409197365329920
author Rueegg, Corina S.
Stenehjem, Jo S.
Egger, Matthias
Ghiasvand, Reza
Cho, Eunyoung
Lund, Eiliv
Weiderpass, Elisabete
Green, Adele C.
Veierød, Marit B.
author_facet Rueegg, Corina S.
Stenehjem, Jo S.
Egger, Matthias
Ghiasvand, Reza
Cho, Eunyoung
Lund, Eiliv
Weiderpass, Elisabete
Green, Adele C.
Veierød, Marit B.
author_sort Rueegg, Corina S.
collection PubMed
description Whether sunscreen use affects melanoma risk has been widely studied with contradictory results. To answer this question we performed a systematic review of all published studies, accounting for sources of heterogeneity and bias. We searched for original articles investigating the sunscreen‐melanoma association in humans to February 28, 2018. We then used random‐effects meta‐analysis to combine estimates of the association, stratified by study design. Stratified meta‐analysis and meta‐regression were used to identify sources of heterogeneity. We included 21,069 melanoma cases from 28 studies published 1979–2018: 23 case–control (11 hospital‐based, 12 population‐based), 1 ecological, 3 cohort and 1 randomised controlled trial (RCT). There was marked heterogeneity across study designs and among case–control studies but adjustment for confounding by sun exposure, sunburns and phenotype systematically moved estimates toward decreased melanoma risk among sunscreen users. Ever‐ vs. never‐use of sunscreen was inversely associated with melanoma in hospital‐based case–control studies (adjusted odds ratio (OR) = 0.57, 95%confidence interval (CI) 0.37–0.87, p (heterogeneity) < 0.001), the ecological study (rate ratio = 0.48, 95%CI 0.35–0.66), and the RCT (hazard ratio (HR) = 0.49, 95%CI 0.24–1.01). It was not associated in population‐based case–control studies (OR = 1.17, 95%CI 0.90–1.51, p (heterogeneity) < 0.001) and was positively associated in the cohort studies (HR = 1.27, 95%CI 1.07–1.51, p (heterogeneity) = 0.236). The association differed by latitude (p (interaction) = 0.042), region (p (interaction) = 0.008), adjustment for naevi/freckling (p (interaction) = 0.035), and proportion of never‐sunscreen‐users (p (interaction) = 0·012). Evidence from observational studies on sunscreen use and melanoma risk was weak and heterogeneous, consistent with the challenges of controlling for innate confounding by indication. The only RCT showed a protective effect of sunscreen.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6451658
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64516582019-05-23 Challenges in assessing the sunscreen‐melanoma association Rueegg, Corina S. Stenehjem, Jo S. Egger, Matthias Ghiasvand, Reza Cho, Eunyoung Lund, Eiliv Weiderpass, Elisabete Green, Adele C. Veierød, Marit B. Int J Cancer Cancer Epidemiology Whether sunscreen use affects melanoma risk has been widely studied with contradictory results. To answer this question we performed a systematic review of all published studies, accounting for sources of heterogeneity and bias. We searched for original articles investigating the sunscreen‐melanoma association in humans to February 28, 2018. We then used random‐effects meta‐analysis to combine estimates of the association, stratified by study design. Stratified meta‐analysis and meta‐regression were used to identify sources of heterogeneity. We included 21,069 melanoma cases from 28 studies published 1979–2018: 23 case–control (11 hospital‐based, 12 population‐based), 1 ecological, 3 cohort and 1 randomised controlled trial (RCT). There was marked heterogeneity across study designs and among case–control studies but adjustment for confounding by sun exposure, sunburns and phenotype systematically moved estimates toward decreased melanoma risk among sunscreen users. Ever‐ vs. never‐use of sunscreen was inversely associated with melanoma in hospital‐based case–control studies (adjusted odds ratio (OR) = 0.57, 95%confidence interval (CI) 0.37–0.87, p (heterogeneity) < 0.001), the ecological study (rate ratio = 0.48, 95%CI 0.35–0.66), and the RCT (hazard ratio (HR) = 0.49, 95%CI 0.24–1.01). It was not associated in population‐based case–control studies (OR = 1.17, 95%CI 0.90–1.51, p (heterogeneity) < 0.001) and was positively associated in the cohort studies (HR = 1.27, 95%CI 1.07–1.51, p (heterogeneity) = 0.236). The association differed by latitude (p (interaction) = 0.042), region (p (interaction) = 0.008), adjustment for naevi/freckling (p (interaction) = 0.035), and proportion of never‐sunscreen‐users (p (interaction) = 0·012). Evidence from observational studies on sunscreen use and melanoma risk was weak and heterogeneous, consistent with the challenges of controlling for innate confounding by indication. The only RCT showed a protective effect of sunscreen. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2019-01-07 2019-06-01 /pmc/articles/PMC6451658/ /pubmed/30447006 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ijc.31997 Text en © 2018 The Authors. International Journal of Cancer published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of UICC This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Cancer Epidemiology
Rueegg, Corina S.
Stenehjem, Jo S.
Egger, Matthias
Ghiasvand, Reza
Cho, Eunyoung
Lund, Eiliv
Weiderpass, Elisabete
Green, Adele C.
Veierød, Marit B.
Challenges in assessing the sunscreen‐melanoma association
title Challenges in assessing the sunscreen‐melanoma association
title_full Challenges in assessing the sunscreen‐melanoma association
title_fullStr Challenges in assessing the sunscreen‐melanoma association
title_full_unstemmed Challenges in assessing the sunscreen‐melanoma association
title_short Challenges in assessing the sunscreen‐melanoma association
title_sort challenges in assessing the sunscreen‐melanoma association
topic Cancer Epidemiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6451658/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30447006
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ijc.31997
work_keys_str_mv AT rueeggcorinas challengesinassessingthesunscreenmelanomaassociation
AT stenehjemjos challengesinassessingthesunscreenmelanomaassociation
AT eggermatthias challengesinassessingthesunscreenmelanomaassociation
AT ghiasvandreza challengesinassessingthesunscreenmelanomaassociation
AT choeunyoung challengesinassessingthesunscreenmelanomaassociation
AT lundeiliv challengesinassessingthesunscreenmelanomaassociation
AT weiderpasselisabete challengesinassessingthesunscreenmelanomaassociation
AT greenadelec challengesinassessingthesunscreenmelanomaassociation
AT veierødmaritb challengesinassessingthesunscreenmelanomaassociation