Cargando…
Canine edge width and height affect dental esthetics in maxillary canine substitution treatment
BACKGROUND: To investigate the effect of canine edge width and height on dental esthetics in maxillary canine substitution treatment. METHODS: A total of 127 canine substitution treatment cases were screened and evaluated by a panel of orthodontic experts and laypersons in the pilot study. The top f...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6451936/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30957211 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40510-019-0268-y |
_version_ | 1783409240268865536 |
---|---|
author | Li, Ruomei Mei, Li Wang, Pengfei He, Jiarong Meng, Qingyan Zhong, Linna Zheng, Wei Li, Yu |
author_facet | Li, Ruomei Mei, Li Wang, Pengfei He, Jiarong Meng, Qingyan Zhong, Linna Zheng, Wei Li, Yu |
author_sort | Li, Ruomei |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: To investigate the effect of canine edge width and height on dental esthetics in maxillary canine substitution treatment. METHODS: A total of 127 canine substitution treatment cases were screened and evaluated by a panel of orthodontic experts and laypersons in the pilot study. The top five subjects with the esthetically most pleasant canine substitution were included in the study, resulting in 140 computerized images displaying only the upper dentition, with different canine edge widths (0%, 12.5%, 25%, 37.5%, 50%, 62.5%, and 75% of the central clinical width) and heights (− 0.5 mm, 0 mm, 0.5 mm, and 1.0 mm vertically relative to the central incisor edge) finally used for the esthetic evaluation by 101 observers (41 orthodontists and 60 laypersons). The ordered logistic regression analysis, the univariate analysis of variance, the chi-square, and Fisher’s exact tests were used for statistical analyses. RESULTS: The most esthetic canine shape for canine substitution was found to be a shape with the edge width of 62.5% of the central incisor width and the edge height of 0.5 mm gingival to the central incisor edge (P < 0.05). The canine edge width of 50–75% and height of 0.5–0 mm gingival to the central incisor edge were generally considered to be esthetic by all observers. Orthodontists and laypersons had the same ranking on the top two most esthetic canine shapes (edge width and height 62.5% and 0.5 mm gingival; 50% and 0 mm incisal) as well as the bottom two most unesthetic canine shape (0% and 0.5 mm gingival; 75% and 1 mm incisal). Male and female observers generally had similar esthetic grades and rankings on the canine shapes (P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The most esthetic canine shape for canine substitution is a shape with the canine edge width of 62.5% of the central incisor width and the edge height of 0.5 mm gingival to the central incisor edge. The different collocations of the canine edge width and height affect dental esthetics of the canine during canine substitution treatment. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6451936 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-64519362019-04-26 Canine edge width and height affect dental esthetics in maxillary canine substitution treatment Li, Ruomei Mei, Li Wang, Pengfei He, Jiarong Meng, Qingyan Zhong, Linna Zheng, Wei Li, Yu Prog Orthod Research BACKGROUND: To investigate the effect of canine edge width and height on dental esthetics in maxillary canine substitution treatment. METHODS: A total of 127 canine substitution treatment cases were screened and evaluated by a panel of orthodontic experts and laypersons in the pilot study. The top five subjects with the esthetically most pleasant canine substitution were included in the study, resulting in 140 computerized images displaying only the upper dentition, with different canine edge widths (0%, 12.5%, 25%, 37.5%, 50%, 62.5%, and 75% of the central clinical width) and heights (− 0.5 mm, 0 mm, 0.5 mm, and 1.0 mm vertically relative to the central incisor edge) finally used for the esthetic evaluation by 101 observers (41 orthodontists and 60 laypersons). The ordered logistic regression analysis, the univariate analysis of variance, the chi-square, and Fisher’s exact tests were used for statistical analyses. RESULTS: The most esthetic canine shape for canine substitution was found to be a shape with the edge width of 62.5% of the central incisor width and the edge height of 0.5 mm gingival to the central incisor edge (P < 0.05). The canine edge width of 50–75% and height of 0.5–0 mm gingival to the central incisor edge were generally considered to be esthetic by all observers. Orthodontists and laypersons had the same ranking on the top two most esthetic canine shapes (edge width and height 62.5% and 0.5 mm gingival; 50% and 0 mm incisal) as well as the bottom two most unesthetic canine shape (0% and 0.5 mm gingival; 75% and 1 mm incisal). Male and female observers generally had similar esthetic grades and rankings on the canine shapes (P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The most esthetic canine shape for canine substitution is a shape with the canine edge width of 62.5% of the central incisor width and the edge height of 0.5 mm gingival to the central incisor edge. The different collocations of the canine edge width and height affect dental esthetics of the canine during canine substitution treatment. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2019-04-08 /pmc/articles/PMC6451936/ /pubmed/30957211 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40510-019-0268-y Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Research Li, Ruomei Mei, Li Wang, Pengfei He, Jiarong Meng, Qingyan Zhong, Linna Zheng, Wei Li, Yu Canine edge width and height affect dental esthetics in maxillary canine substitution treatment |
title | Canine edge width and height affect dental esthetics in maxillary canine substitution treatment |
title_full | Canine edge width and height affect dental esthetics in maxillary canine substitution treatment |
title_fullStr | Canine edge width and height affect dental esthetics in maxillary canine substitution treatment |
title_full_unstemmed | Canine edge width and height affect dental esthetics in maxillary canine substitution treatment |
title_short | Canine edge width and height affect dental esthetics in maxillary canine substitution treatment |
title_sort | canine edge width and height affect dental esthetics in maxillary canine substitution treatment |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6451936/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30957211 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40510-019-0268-y |
work_keys_str_mv | AT liruomei canineedgewidthandheightaffectdentalestheticsinmaxillarycaninesubstitutiontreatment AT meili canineedgewidthandheightaffectdentalestheticsinmaxillarycaninesubstitutiontreatment AT wangpengfei canineedgewidthandheightaffectdentalestheticsinmaxillarycaninesubstitutiontreatment AT hejiarong canineedgewidthandheightaffectdentalestheticsinmaxillarycaninesubstitutiontreatment AT mengqingyan canineedgewidthandheightaffectdentalestheticsinmaxillarycaninesubstitutiontreatment AT zhonglinna canineedgewidthandheightaffectdentalestheticsinmaxillarycaninesubstitutiontreatment AT zhengwei canineedgewidthandheightaffectdentalestheticsinmaxillarycaninesubstitutiontreatment AT liyu canineedgewidthandheightaffectdentalestheticsinmaxillarycaninesubstitutiontreatment |