Cargando…

Canine edge width and height affect dental esthetics in maxillary canine substitution treatment

BACKGROUND: To investigate the effect of canine edge width and height on dental esthetics in maxillary canine substitution treatment. METHODS: A total of 127 canine substitution treatment cases were screened and evaluated by a panel of orthodontic experts and laypersons in the pilot study. The top f...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Li, Ruomei, Mei, Li, Wang, Pengfei, He, Jiarong, Meng, Qingyan, Zhong, Linna, Zheng, Wei, Li, Yu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6451936/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30957211
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40510-019-0268-y
_version_ 1783409240268865536
author Li, Ruomei
Mei, Li
Wang, Pengfei
He, Jiarong
Meng, Qingyan
Zhong, Linna
Zheng, Wei
Li, Yu
author_facet Li, Ruomei
Mei, Li
Wang, Pengfei
He, Jiarong
Meng, Qingyan
Zhong, Linna
Zheng, Wei
Li, Yu
author_sort Li, Ruomei
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: To investigate the effect of canine edge width and height on dental esthetics in maxillary canine substitution treatment. METHODS: A total of 127 canine substitution treatment cases were screened and evaluated by a panel of orthodontic experts and laypersons in the pilot study. The top five subjects with the esthetically most pleasant canine substitution were included in the study, resulting in 140 computerized images displaying only the upper dentition, with different canine edge widths (0%, 12.5%, 25%, 37.5%, 50%, 62.5%, and 75% of the central clinical width) and heights (− 0.5 mm, 0 mm, 0.5 mm, and 1.0 mm vertically relative to the central incisor edge) finally used for the esthetic evaluation by 101 observers (41 orthodontists and 60 laypersons). The ordered logistic regression analysis, the univariate analysis of variance, the chi-square, and Fisher’s exact tests were used for statistical analyses. RESULTS: The most esthetic canine shape for canine substitution was found to be a shape with the edge width of 62.5% of the central incisor width and the edge height of 0.5 mm gingival to the central incisor edge (P < 0.05). The canine edge width of 50–75% and height of 0.5–0 mm gingival to the central incisor edge were generally considered to be esthetic by all observers. Orthodontists and laypersons had the same ranking on the top two most esthetic canine shapes (edge width and height 62.5% and 0.5 mm gingival; 50% and 0 mm incisal) as well as the bottom two most unesthetic canine shape (0% and 0.5 mm gingival; 75% and 1 mm incisal). Male and female observers generally had similar esthetic grades and rankings on the canine shapes (P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The most esthetic canine shape for canine substitution is a shape with the canine edge width of 62.5% of the central incisor width and the edge height of 0.5 mm gingival to the central incisor edge. The different collocations of the canine edge width and height affect dental esthetics of the canine during canine substitution treatment.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6451936
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64519362019-04-26 Canine edge width and height affect dental esthetics in maxillary canine substitution treatment Li, Ruomei Mei, Li Wang, Pengfei He, Jiarong Meng, Qingyan Zhong, Linna Zheng, Wei Li, Yu Prog Orthod Research BACKGROUND: To investigate the effect of canine edge width and height on dental esthetics in maxillary canine substitution treatment. METHODS: A total of 127 canine substitution treatment cases were screened and evaluated by a panel of orthodontic experts and laypersons in the pilot study. The top five subjects with the esthetically most pleasant canine substitution were included in the study, resulting in 140 computerized images displaying only the upper dentition, with different canine edge widths (0%, 12.5%, 25%, 37.5%, 50%, 62.5%, and 75% of the central clinical width) and heights (− 0.5 mm, 0 mm, 0.5 mm, and 1.0 mm vertically relative to the central incisor edge) finally used for the esthetic evaluation by 101 observers (41 orthodontists and 60 laypersons). The ordered logistic regression analysis, the univariate analysis of variance, the chi-square, and Fisher’s exact tests were used for statistical analyses. RESULTS: The most esthetic canine shape for canine substitution was found to be a shape with the edge width of 62.5% of the central incisor width and the edge height of 0.5 mm gingival to the central incisor edge (P < 0.05). The canine edge width of 50–75% and height of 0.5–0 mm gingival to the central incisor edge were generally considered to be esthetic by all observers. Orthodontists and laypersons had the same ranking on the top two most esthetic canine shapes (edge width and height 62.5% and 0.5 mm gingival; 50% and 0 mm incisal) as well as the bottom two most unesthetic canine shape (0% and 0.5 mm gingival; 75% and 1 mm incisal). Male and female observers generally had similar esthetic grades and rankings on the canine shapes (P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The most esthetic canine shape for canine substitution is a shape with the canine edge width of 62.5% of the central incisor width and the edge height of 0.5 mm gingival to the central incisor edge. The different collocations of the canine edge width and height affect dental esthetics of the canine during canine substitution treatment. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2019-04-08 /pmc/articles/PMC6451936/ /pubmed/30957211 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40510-019-0268-y Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Research
Li, Ruomei
Mei, Li
Wang, Pengfei
He, Jiarong
Meng, Qingyan
Zhong, Linna
Zheng, Wei
Li, Yu
Canine edge width and height affect dental esthetics in maxillary canine substitution treatment
title Canine edge width and height affect dental esthetics in maxillary canine substitution treatment
title_full Canine edge width and height affect dental esthetics in maxillary canine substitution treatment
title_fullStr Canine edge width and height affect dental esthetics in maxillary canine substitution treatment
title_full_unstemmed Canine edge width and height affect dental esthetics in maxillary canine substitution treatment
title_short Canine edge width and height affect dental esthetics in maxillary canine substitution treatment
title_sort canine edge width and height affect dental esthetics in maxillary canine substitution treatment
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6451936/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30957211
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40510-019-0268-y
work_keys_str_mv AT liruomei canineedgewidthandheightaffectdentalestheticsinmaxillarycaninesubstitutiontreatment
AT meili canineedgewidthandheightaffectdentalestheticsinmaxillarycaninesubstitutiontreatment
AT wangpengfei canineedgewidthandheightaffectdentalestheticsinmaxillarycaninesubstitutiontreatment
AT hejiarong canineedgewidthandheightaffectdentalestheticsinmaxillarycaninesubstitutiontreatment
AT mengqingyan canineedgewidthandheightaffectdentalestheticsinmaxillarycaninesubstitutiontreatment
AT zhonglinna canineedgewidthandheightaffectdentalestheticsinmaxillarycaninesubstitutiontreatment
AT zhengwei canineedgewidthandheightaffectdentalestheticsinmaxillarycaninesubstitutiontreatment
AT liyu canineedgewidthandheightaffectdentalestheticsinmaxillarycaninesubstitutiontreatment