Cargando…
Maribavir for Refractory or Resistant Cytomegalovirus Infections in Hematopoietic-cell or Solid-organ Transplant Recipients: A Randomized, Dose-ranging, Double-blind, Phase 2 Study
BACKGROUND: Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infections that are refractory or resistant (RR) to available antivirals ([val]ganciclovir, foscarnet, cidofovir) are associated with higher mortality in transplant patients. Maribavir is active against RR CMV strains. METHODS: Hematopoietic-cell or solid-organ tran...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6451997/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30329038 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciy706 |
_version_ | 1783409248499138560 |
---|---|
author | Papanicolaou, Genovefa A Silveira, Fernanda P Langston, Amelia A Pereira, Marcus R Avery, Robin K Uknis, Marc Wijatyk, Anna Wu, Jingyang Boeckh, Michael Marty, Francisco M Villano, Stephen |
author_facet | Papanicolaou, Genovefa A Silveira, Fernanda P Langston, Amelia A Pereira, Marcus R Avery, Robin K Uknis, Marc Wijatyk, Anna Wu, Jingyang Boeckh, Michael Marty, Francisco M Villano, Stephen |
author_sort | Papanicolaou, Genovefa A |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infections that are refractory or resistant (RR) to available antivirals ([val]ganciclovir, foscarnet, cidofovir) are associated with higher mortality in transplant patients. Maribavir is active against RR CMV strains. METHODS: Hematopoietic-cell or solid-organ transplant recipients ≥12 years old with RR CMV infections and plasma CMV deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) ≥1000 copies/mL were randomized (1:1:1) to twice-daily dose-blinded maribavir 400, 800, or 1200 mg for up to 24 weeks. The primary efficacy endpoint was the proportion of patients with confirmed undetectable plasma CMV DNA within 6 weeks of treatment. Safety analyses included the frequency and severity of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs). RESULTS: From July 2012 to December 2014, 120 patients were randomized and treated (40 per dose group): 80/120 (67%) patients achieved undetectable CMV DNA within 6 weeks of treatment (95% confidence interval, 57–75%), with rates of 70%, 63%, and 68%, respectively, for maribavir 400, 800, and 1200 mg twice daily. Recurrent on-treatment CMV infections occurred in 25 patients; 13 developed mutations conferring maribavir resistance. Maribavir was discontinued due to adverse events in 41/120 (34%) patients, and 17/41 discontinued due to CMV infections. During the study, 32 (27%) patients died, 4 due to CMV disease. Dysgeusia was the most common TEAE (78/120; 65%) and led to maribavir discontinuation in 1 patient. Absolute neutrophil counts <1000/µL were noted in 12/106 (11%) evaluable patients, with rates similar across doses. CONCLUSIONS: Maribavir ≥400 mg twice daily was active against RR CMV infections in transplant recipients; no new safety signals were identified. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: NCT01611974. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6451997 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-64519972019-04-11 Maribavir for Refractory or Resistant Cytomegalovirus Infections in Hematopoietic-cell or Solid-organ Transplant Recipients: A Randomized, Dose-ranging, Double-blind, Phase 2 Study Papanicolaou, Genovefa A Silveira, Fernanda P Langston, Amelia A Pereira, Marcus R Avery, Robin K Uknis, Marc Wijatyk, Anna Wu, Jingyang Boeckh, Michael Marty, Francisco M Villano, Stephen Clin Infect Dis Articles and Commentaries BACKGROUND: Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infections that are refractory or resistant (RR) to available antivirals ([val]ganciclovir, foscarnet, cidofovir) are associated with higher mortality in transplant patients. Maribavir is active against RR CMV strains. METHODS: Hematopoietic-cell or solid-organ transplant recipients ≥12 years old with RR CMV infections and plasma CMV deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) ≥1000 copies/mL were randomized (1:1:1) to twice-daily dose-blinded maribavir 400, 800, or 1200 mg for up to 24 weeks. The primary efficacy endpoint was the proportion of patients with confirmed undetectable plasma CMV DNA within 6 weeks of treatment. Safety analyses included the frequency and severity of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs). RESULTS: From July 2012 to December 2014, 120 patients were randomized and treated (40 per dose group): 80/120 (67%) patients achieved undetectable CMV DNA within 6 weeks of treatment (95% confidence interval, 57–75%), with rates of 70%, 63%, and 68%, respectively, for maribavir 400, 800, and 1200 mg twice daily. Recurrent on-treatment CMV infections occurred in 25 patients; 13 developed mutations conferring maribavir resistance. Maribavir was discontinued due to adverse events in 41/120 (34%) patients, and 17/41 discontinued due to CMV infections. During the study, 32 (27%) patients died, 4 due to CMV disease. Dysgeusia was the most common TEAE (78/120; 65%) and led to maribavir discontinuation in 1 patient. Absolute neutrophil counts <1000/µL were noted in 12/106 (11%) evaluable patients, with rates similar across doses. CONCLUSIONS: Maribavir ≥400 mg twice daily was active against RR CMV infections in transplant recipients; no new safety signals were identified. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: NCT01611974. Oxford University Press 2019-04-15 2018-10-16 /pmc/articles/PMC6451997/ /pubmed/30329038 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciy706 Text en © The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press for the Infectious Diseases Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com |
spellingShingle | Articles and Commentaries Papanicolaou, Genovefa A Silveira, Fernanda P Langston, Amelia A Pereira, Marcus R Avery, Robin K Uknis, Marc Wijatyk, Anna Wu, Jingyang Boeckh, Michael Marty, Francisco M Villano, Stephen Maribavir for Refractory or Resistant Cytomegalovirus Infections in Hematopoietic-cell or Solid-organ Transplant Recipients: A Randomized, Dose-ranging, Double-blind, Phase 2 Study |
title | Maribavir for Refractory or Resistant Cytomegalovirus Infections in Hematopoietic-cell or Solid-organ Transplant Recipients: A Randomized, Dose-ranging, Double-blind, Phase 2 Study |
title_full | Maribavir for Refractory or Resistant Cytomegalovirus Infections in Hematopoietic-cell or Solid-organ Transplant Recipients: A Randomized, Dose-ranging, Double-blind, Phase 2 Study |
title_fullStr | Maribavir for Refractory or Resistant Cytomegalovirus Infections in Hematopoietic-cell or Solid-organ Transplant Recipients: A Randomized, Dose-ranging, Double-blind, Phase 2 Study |
title_full_unstemmed | Maribavir for Refractory or Resistant Cytomegalovirus Infections in Hematopoietic-cell or Solid-organ Transplant Recipients: A Randomized, Dose-ranging, Double-blind, Phase 2 Study |
title_short | Maribavir for Refractory or Resistant Cytomegalovirus Infections in Hematopoietic-cell or Solid-organ Transplant Recipients: A Randomized, Dose-ranging, Double-blind, Phase 2 Study |
title_sort | maribavir for refractory or resistant cytomegalovirus infections in hematopoietic-cell or solid-organ transplant recipients: a randomized, dose-ranging, double-blind, phase 2 study |
topic | Articles and Commentaries |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6451997/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30329038 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciy706 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT papanicolaougenovefaa maribavirforrefractoryorresistantcytomegalovirusinfectionsinhematopoieticcellorsolidorgantransplantrecipientsarandomizeddoserangingdoubleblindphase2study AT silveirafernandap maribavirforrefractoryorresistantcytomegalovirusinfectionsinhematopoieticcellorsolidorgantransplantrecipientsarandomizeddoserangingdoubleblindphase2study AT langstonameliaa maribavirforrefractoryorresistantcytomegalovirusinfectionsinhematopoieticcellorsolidorgantransplantrecipientsarandomizeddoserangingdoubleblindphase2study AT pereiramarcusr maribavirforrefractoryorresistantcytomegalovirusinfectionsinhematopoieticcellorsolidorgantransplantrecipientsarandomizeddoserangingdoubleblindphase2study AT averyrobink maribavirforrefractoryorresistantcytomegalovirusinfectionsinhematopoieticcellorsolidorgantransplantrecipientsarandomizeddoserangingdoubleblindphase2study AT uknismarc maribavirforrefractoryorresistantcytomegalovirusinfectionsinhematopoieticcellorsolidorgantransplantrecipientsarandomizeddoserangingdoubleblindphase2study AT wijatykanna maribavirforrefractoryorresistantcytomegalovirusinfectionsinhematopoieticcellorsolidorgantransplantrecipientsarandomizeddoserangingdoubleblindphase2study AT wujingyang maribavirforrefractoryorresistantcytomegalovirusinfectionsinhematopoieticcellorsolidorgantransplantrecipientsarandomizeddoserangingdoubleblindphase2study AT boeckhmichael maribavirforrefractoryorresistantcytomegalovirusinfectionsinhematopoieticcellorsolidorgantransplantrecipientsarandomizeddoserangingdoubleblindphase2study AT martyfranciscom maribavirforrefractoryorresistantcytomegalovirusinfectionsinhematopoieticcellorsolidorgantransplantrecipientsarandomizeddoserangingdoubleblindphase2study AT villanostephen maribavirforrefractoryorresistantcytomegalovirusinfectionsinhematopoieticcellorsolidorgantransplantrecipientsarandomizeddoserangingdoubleblindphase2study |