Cargando…
Risk of bias judgements and strength of conclusions in meta-evidence from the Cochrane Colorectal Cancer Group
BACKGROUND: The Cochrane Collaboration records risk of bias (ROB) judgements on the original studies it analyses. The aim of this review is to perform an audit of all literature produced by the Cochrane Colorectal Cancer Group (CCCG), focusing on whether intervention type has any relationship with R...
Autores principales: | Delaney, John, Cui, Rebecca, Engel, Alexander |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6452506/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30961675 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-019-1001-0 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Conclusiveness of the Cochrane Eye and Vision Group Reviews
por: Mimouni, Michael, et al.
Publicado: (2015) -
The judgement of biases included in the category “other bias” in Cochrane systematic reviews of interventions: a systematic survey
por: Babic, Andrija, et al.
Publicado: (2019) -
Recommendations by Cochrane Review Groups for assessment of the risk of bias in studies
por: Lundh, Andreas, et al.
Publicado: (2008) -
Meta-analysis and The Cochrane Collaboration: 20 years of the Cochrane Statistical Methods Group
por: McKenzie, Joanne E, et al.
Publicado: (2013) -
Housing and personality effects on judgement and attention biases in dairy cows
por: Kremer, Louise, et al.
Publicado: (2021)