Cargando…
Is prilocaine safe and potent enough for use in the oral surgery of medically compromised patients
OBJECTIVES: To investigate the potency and speed of action of 2% lidocaine and 3% prilocaine for upper teeth extractions. METHODS: This prospective clinical study was conducted from November 2016 to May 2017. Ninety-six patients, aged between 16 to 70 years old were recruited in this study. Two regi...
Autor principal: | Gazal, Giath |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Saudi Medical Journal
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6452603/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30617388 http://dx.doi.org/10.15537/smj.2019.1.23475 |
Ejemplares similares
-
2% lidocaine versus 3% prilocaine for oral and maxillofacial surgery
por: Alsharif, Ali, et al.
Publicado: (2018) -
Does articaine, rather than prilocaine, increase the success rate of anaesthesia for extraction of maxillary teeth
por: Gazal, Giath
Publicado: (2020) -
Is Articaine More Potent than Mepivacaine for Use in Oral Surgery?
por: Gazal, Giath
Publicado: (2018) -
Rules of selection for a safe local anesthetic in dentistry
por: Gazal, Giath, et al.
Publicado: (2023) -
Comparison of the Effects of Low Volume Prilocaine and Alkalinized Prilocaine for the Regional Intravenous Anesthesia Technique in Hand and Wrist Surgery
por: Kapusuz, Ozlem, et al.
Publicado: (2014)