Cargando…
Fast-track Protocol versus Conventional Protocol on Patient Outcome: A Randomized Clinical Trial
BACKGROUND: The aim of this study is to compare fast-track methodology with traditional methods of surgical care in achieving better patient outcome, and ensuring a timely discharge from the hospital, and also note the factors that are responsible for a delayed discharge from the hospital. MATERIALS...
Autores principales: | Iyer, Sandhya P, Kareem, Zeeshan |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6452765/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31007510 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/njs.NJS_34_17 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Fast-track surgery versus conventional perioperative management of lung cancer-associated pneumonectomy: a randomized controlled clinical trial
por: Dong, Qing, et al.
Publicado: (2017) -
3-dimensional versus conventional laparoscopy for benign hysterectomy: protocol for a randomized clinical trial
por: Hoffmann, Elise, et al.
Publicado: (2017) -
Comparison of Fast-Track Versus Conventional Surgery Protocol for Patients Undergoing Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy: A Chinese Experience
por: Huang, Zhichao, et al.
Publicado: (2018) -
ICONIC study—conservative versus conventional oxygenation targets in intensive care patients: study protocol for a randomized clinical trial
por: Grim, C. C. A., et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
Ultra fast-tracking versus a conventional strategy in valve replacement surgery
por: Kandasamy, Ashok, et al.
Publicado: (2013)