Cargando…

Sampling of urine for diagnosing urinary tract infection in general practice – First-void or mid-stream urine?

Objective: To study 1) whether the accuracy of point-of-care (POC) urine tests (dipstick, phase-contrast microscopy and culture) differs when performed on first-void urine (FVU) compared to mid-stream urine (MSU), and 2) if a delay of analysis up to four hours affects the accuracy of POC tests when...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pernille, Hoelmkjaer, Lars, Bjerrum, Marjukka, Mäkelä, Volkert, Siersma, Anne, Holm
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Taylor & Francis 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6452804/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30689471
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02813432.2019.1568708
_version_ 1783409348879319040
author Pernille, Hoelmkjaer
Lars, Bjerrum
Marjukka, Mäkelä
Volkert, Siersma
Anne, Holm
author_facet Pernille, Hoelmkjaer
Lars, Bjerrum
Marjukka, Mäkelä
Volkert, Siersma
Anne, Holm
author_sort Pernille, Hoelmkjaer
collection PubMed
description Objective: To study 1) whether the accuracy of point-of-care (POC) urine tests (dipstick, phase-contrast microscopy and culture) differs when performed on first-void urine (FVU) compared to mid-stream urine (MSU), and 2) if a delay of analysis up to four hours affects the accuracy of POC tests when performed on urine from symptomatic of urinary tract infection (UTI), non-pregnant women in general practice. Design: Prospective diagnostic study using paired samples. Setting/Intervention: Three general practices in Copenhagen. Each woman delivered FVU and MSU samples from the same void. As a reference standard, 8 ml of MSU was sent for culture at the Microbiology Department. Patients: 117 women with one or more symptoms of UTI. Main outcome measures: Sensitivity, specificity and agreement with the reference standard of FVU and MSU with different time delays (zero vs. one vs. four hours) as compared to reference standard (MSU at time zero in boric acid tubes). Results: All three POC tests performed on MSU were significantly more in agreement with the reference than when performed on FVU when analysis was done immediately. The error rate was 16% for MSU vs. 23% for FVU with POC culture, 27% vs. 40% with microscopy and 25% vs. 33% with dipstick testing. Delay of analysis up to four hours did not decrease agreement with the reference. Conclusion/Implication: KEY POINTS: Point-of-care tests (dipstick testing, microscopy and culture) for diagnosing urinary tract infection performed on mid-stream urine samples are significantly more accurate than when performed on first-void urine samples. Delay of analysis up to four hours did not decrease the accuracy of any of the point-of-care tests. Point-of-care culture was more accurate than dipstick and microscopy both when performed on mid-stream urine and first-void urine. The main contaminant in first-void urine samples was Enterococci spp., which contributed to the majority of false positives.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6452804
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Taylor & Francis
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64528042019-04-18 Sampling of urine for diagnosing urinary tract infection in general practice – First-void or mid-stream urine? Pernille, Hoelmkjaer Lars, Bjerrum Marjukka, Mäkelä Volkert, Siersma Anne, Holm Scand J Prim Health Care Original Article Objective: To study 1) whether the accuracy of point-of-care (POC) urine tests (dipstick, phase-contrast microscopy and culture) differs when performed on first-void urine (FVU) compared to mid-stream urine (MSU), and 2) if a delay of analysis up to four hours affects the accuracy of POC tests when performed on urine from symptomatic of urinary tract infection (UTI), non-pregnant women in general practice. Design: Prospective diagnostic study using paired samples. Setting/Intervention: Three general practices in Copenhagen. Each woman delivered FVU and MSU samples from the same void. As a reference standard, 8 ml of MSU was sent for culture at the Microbiology Department. Patients: 117 women with one or more symptoms of UTI. Main outcome measures: Sensitivity, specificity and agreement with the reference standard of FVU and MSU with different time delays (zero vs. one vs. four hours) as compared to reference standard (MSU at time zero in boric acid tubes). Results: All three POC tests performed on MSU were significantly more in agreement with the reference than when performed on FVU when analysis was done immediately. The error rate was 16% for MSU vs. 23% for FVU with POC culture, 27% vs. 40% with microscopy and 25% vs. 33% with dipstick testing. Delay of analysis up to four hours did not decrease agreement with the reference. Conclusion/Implication: KEY POINTS: Point-of-care tests (dipstick testing, microscopy and culture) for diagnosing urinary tract infection performed on mid-stream urine samples are significantly more accurate than when performed on first-void urine samples. Delay of analysis up to four hours did not decrease the accuracy of any of the point-of-care tests. Point-of-care culture was more accurate than dipstick and microscopy both when performed on mid-stream urine and first-void urine. The main contaminant in first-void urine samples was Enterococci spp., which contributed to the majority of false positives. Taylor & Francis 2019-01-28 /pmc/articles/PMC6452804/ /pubmed/30689471 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02813432.2019.1568708 Text en © 2019 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Pernille, Hoelmkjaer
Lars, Bjerrum
Marjukka, Mäkelä
Volkert, Siersma
Anne, Holm
Sampling of urine for diagnosing urinary tract infection in general practice – First-void or mid-stream urine?
title Sampling of urine for diagnosing urinary tract infection in general practice – First-void or mid-stream urine?
title_full Sampling of urine for diagnosing urinary tract infection in general practice – First-void or mid-stream urine?
title_fullStr Sampling of urine for diagnosing urinary tract infection in general practice – First-void or mid-stream urine?
title_full_unstemmed Sampling of urine for diagnosing urinary tract infection in general practice – First-void or mid-stream urine?
title_short Sampling of urine for diagnosing urinary tract infection in general practice – First-void or mid-stream urine?
title_sort sampling of urine for diagnosing urinary tract infection in general practice – first-void or mid-stream urine?
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6452804/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30689471
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02813432.2019.1568708
work_keys_str_mv AT pernillehoelmkjaer samplingofurinefordiagnosingurinarytractinfectioningeneralpracticefirstvoidormidstreamurine
AT larsbjerrum samplingofurinefordiagnosingurinarytractinfectioningeneralpracticefirstvoidormidstreamurine
AT marjukkamakela samplingofurinefordiagnosingurinarytractinfectioningeneralpracticefirstvoidormidstreamurine
AT volkertsiersma samplingofurinefordiagnosingurinarytractinfectioningeneralpracticefirstvoidormidstreamurine
AT anneholm samplingofurinefordiagnosingurinarytractinfectioningeneralpracticefirstvoidormidstreamurine