Cargando…

Adherence to HIV treatment regimens: systematic literature review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: Antiretroviral therapy (ART), when taken consistently, reduces morbidity and mortality associated with human immunodeficiency virus and viral transmission. Suboptimal treatment adherence is associated with regimen complexity and high tablet burden. Single-tablet regimens (STRs) provide a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Altice, Frederick, Evuarherhe, Obaro, Shina, Sophie, Carter, Gemma, Beaubrun, Anne Christine
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6452814/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31040651
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/PPA.S192735
_version_ 1783409351217643520
author Altice, Frederick
Evuarherhe, Obaro
Shina, Sophie
Carter, Gemma
Beaubrun, Anne Christine
author_facet Altice, Frederick
Evuarherhe, Obaro
Shina, Sophie
Carter, Gemma
Beaubrun, Anne Christine
author_sort Altice, Frederick
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Antiretroviral therapy (ART), when taken consistently, reduces morbidity and mortality associated with human immunodeficiency virus and viral transmission. Suboptimal treatment adherence is associated with regimen complexity and high tablet burden. Single-tablet regimens (STRs) provide a complete treatment regimen in a single tablet. This study examined the relationship between STRs (vs multiple-tablet regimens [MTRs]), treatment adherence, and viral suppression. METHODS: A systematic review was conducted to identify studies investigating at least one of the following: (1) STR/MTR use and adherence; (2) levels of adherence and viral suppression; and (3) STR/MTR use and viral suppression. Meta-analysis was performed to assess the relationship between STR vs MTR use and adherence in observational settings at ≥95% and ≥90% adherence thresholds. RESULTS: In total, 29 studies were identified across the three objectives; two studies were relevant for all objectives. STRs were associated with higher treatment adherence than MTRs in 10/11 observational studies: a 63% greater likelihood of achieving ≥95% adherence (95% CI=1.52–1.74; P<0.001) and a 43% increase in the likelihood of achieving ≥90% adherence (95% CI=1.21–1.69; P<0.001). Higher adherence rates were associated with higher levels of viral suppression in 13/18 studies. Results were mixed in five studies investigating the association between STR or MTR use and viral suppression. CONCLUSION: Although the direct effect of STRs vs MTRs on viral suppression remains unclear, this study provided a quantitative estimate of the relationship between STRs and ART adherence, demonstrating that STRs are associated with significantly higher ART adherence levels at 95% and 90% thresholds. Findings from the systematic review showed that improved adherence results in an increased likelihood of achieving viral suppression in observational settings. Future research should utilize similar measures for adherence and evaluate viral suppression to improve assessment of the relationship between pill burden, adherence, and viral suppression.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6452814
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64528142019-04-30 Adherence to HIV treatment regimens: systematic literature review and meta-analysis Altice, Frederick Evuarherhe, Obaro Shina, Sophie Carter, Gemma Beaubrun, Anne Christine Patient Prefer Adherence Review BACKGROUND: Antiretroviral therapy (ART), when taken consistently, reduces morbidity and mortality associated with human immunodeficiency virus and viral transmission. Suboptimal treatment adherence is associated with regimen complexity and high tablet burden. Single-tablet regimens (STRs) provide a complete treatment regimen in a single tablet. This study examined the relationship between STRs (vs multiple-tablet regimens [MTRs]), treatment adherence, and viral suppression. METHODS: A systematic review was conducted to identify studies investigating at least one of the following: (1) STR/MTR use and adherence; (2) levels of adherence and viral suppression; and (3) STR/MTR use and viral suppression. Meta-analysis was performed to assess the relationship between STR vs MTR use and adherence in observational settings at ≥95% and ≥90% adherence thresholds. RESULTS: In total, 29 studies were identified across the three objectives; two studies were relevant for all objectives. STRs were associated with higher treatment adherence than MTRs in 10/11 observational studies: a 63% greater likelihood of achieving ≥95% adherence (95% CI=1.52–1.74; P<0.001) and a 43% increase in the likelihood of achieving ≥90% adherence (95% CI=1.21–1.69; P<0.001). Higher adherence rates were associated with higher levels of viral suppression in 13/18 studies. Results were mixed in five studies investigating the association between STR or MTR use and viral suppression. CONCLUSION: Although the direct effect of STRs vs MTRs on viral suppression remains unclear, this study provided a quantitative estimate of the relationship between STRs and ART adherence, demonstrating that STRs are associated with significantly higher ART adherence levels at 95% and 90% thresholds. Findings from the systematic review showed that improved adherence results in an increased likelihood of achieving viral suppression in observational settings. Future research should utilize similar measures for adherence and evaluate viral suppression to improve assessment of the relationship between pill burden, adherence, and viral suppression. Dove Medical Press 2019-04-03 /pmc/articles/PMC6452814/ /pubmed/31040651 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/PPA.S192735 Text en © 2019 Altice et al. This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed.
spellingShingle Review
Altice, Frederick
Evuarherhe, Obaro
Shina, Sophie
Carter, Gemma
Beaubrun, Anne Christine
Adherence to HIV treatment regimens: systematic literature review and meta-analysis
title Adherence to HIV treatment regimens: systematic literature review and meta-analysis
title_full Adherence to HIV treatment regimens: systematic literature review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Adherence to HIV treatment regimens: systematic literature review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Adherence to HIV treatment regimens: systematic literature review and meta-analysis
title_short Adherence to HIV treatment regimens: systematic literature review and meta-analysis
title_sort adherence to hiv treatment regimens: systematic literature review and meta-analysis
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6452814/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31040651
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/PPA.S192735
work_keys_str_mv AT alticefrederick adherencetohivtreatmentregimenssystematicliteraturereviewandmetaanalysis
AT evuarherheobaro adherencetohivtreatmentregimenssystematicliteraturereviewandmetaanalysis
AT shinasophie adherencetohivtreatmentregimenssystematicliteraturereviewandmetaanalysis
AT cartergemma adherencetohivtreatmentregimenssystematicliteraturereviewandmetaanalysis
AT beaubrunannechristine adherencetohivtreatmentregimenssystematicliteraturereviewandmetaanalysis