Cargando…
Enzyme promiscuity shapes adaptation to novel growth substrates
Evidence suggests that novel enzyme functions evolved from low‐level promiscuous activities in ancestral enzymes. Yet, the evolutionary dynamics and physiological mechanisms of how such side activities contribute to systems‐level adaptations are not well characterized. Furthermore, it remains untest...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6452873/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30962359 http://dx.doi.org/10.15252/msb.20188462 |
_version_ | 1783409357385367552 |
---|---|
author | Guzmán, Gabriela I Sandberg, Troy E LaCroix, Ryan A Nyerges, Ákos Papp, Henrietta de Raad, Markus King, Zachary A Hefner, Ying Northen, Trent R Notebaart, Richard A Pál, Csaba Palsson, Bernhard O Papp, Balázs Feist, Adam M |
author_facet | Guzmán, Gabriela I Sandberg, Troy E LaCroix, Ryan A Nyerges, Ákos Papp, Henrietta de Raad, Markus King, Zachary A Hefner, Ying Northen, Trent R Notebaart, Richard A Pál, Csaba Palsson, Bernhard O Papp, Balázs Feist, Adam M |
author_sort | Guzmán, Gabriela I |
collection | PubMed |
description | Evidence suggests that novel enzyme functions evolved from low‐level promiscuous activities in ancestral enzymes. Yet, the evolutionary dynamics and physiological mechanisms of how such side activities contribute to systems‐level adaptations are not well characterized. Furthermore, it remains untested whether knowledge of an organism's promiscuous reaction set, or underground metabolism, can aid in forecasting the genetic basis of metabolic adaptations. Here, we employ a computational model of underground metabolism and laboratory evolution experiments to examine the role of enzyme promiscuity in the acquisition and optimization of growth on predicted non‐native substrates in Escherichia coli K‐12 MG1655. After as few as approximately 20 generations, evolved populations repeatedly acquired the capacity to grow on five predicted non‐native substrates—D‐lyxose, D‐2‐deoxyribose, D‐arabinose, m‐tartrate, and monomethyl succinate. Altered promiscuous activities were shown to be directly involved in establishing high‐efficiency pathways. Structural mutations shifted enzyme substrate turnover rates toward the new substrate while retaining a preference for the primary substrate. Finally, genes underlying the phenotypic innovations were accurately predicted by genome‐scale model simulations of metabolism with enzyme promiscuity. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6452873 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-64528732019-04-17 Enzyme promiscuity shapes adaptation to novel growth substrates Guzmán, Gabriela I Sandberg, Troy E LaCroix, Ryan A Nyerges, Ákos Papp, Henrietta de Raad, Markus King, Zachary A Hefner, Ying Northen, Trent R Notebaart, Richard A Pál, Csaba Palsson, Bernhard O Papp, Balázs Feist, Adam M Mol Syst Biol Reports Evidence suggests that novel enzyme functions evolved from low‐level promiscuous activities in ancestral enzymes. Yet, the evolutionary dynamics and physiological mechanisms of how such side activities contribute to systems‐level adaptations are not well characterized. Furthermore, it remains untested whether knowledge of an organism's promiscuous reaction set, or underground metabolism, can aid in forecasting the genetic basis of metabolic adaptations. Here, we employ a computational model of underground metabolism and laboratory evolution experiments to examine the role of enzyme promiscuity in the acquisition and optimization of growth on predicted non‐native substrates in Escherichia coli K‐12 MG1655. After as few as approximately 20 generations, evolved populations repeatedly acquired the capacity to grow on five predicted non‐native substrates—D‐lyxose, D‐2‐deoxyribose, D‐arabinose, m‐tartrate, and monomethyl succinate. Altered promiscuous activities were shown to be directly involved in establishing high‐efficiency pathways. Structural mutations shifted enzyme substrate turnover rates toward the new substrate while retaining a preference for the primary substrate. Finally, genes underlying the phenotypic innovations were accurately predicted by genome‐scale model simulations of metabolism with enzyme promiscuity. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-04-08 /pmc/articles/PMC6452873/ /pubmed/30962359 http://dx.doi.org/10.15252/msb.20188462 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Published under the terms of the CC BY 4.0 license This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Reports Guzmán, Gabriela I Sandberg, Troy E LaCroix, Ryan A Nyerges, Ákos Papp, Henrietta de Raad, Markus King, Zachary A Hefner, Ying Northen, Trent R Notebaart, Richard A Pál, Csaba Palsson, Bernhard O Papp, Balázs Feist, Adam M Enzyme promiscuity shapes adaptation to novel growth substrates |
title | Enzyme promiscuity shapes adaptation to novel growth substrates |
title_full | Enzyme promiscuity shapes adaptation to novel growth substrates |
title_fullStr | Enzyme promiscuity shapes adaptation to novel growth substrates |
title_full_unstemmed | Enzyme promiscuity shapes adaptation to novel growth substrates |
title_short | Enzyme promiscuity shapes adaptation to novel growth substrates |
title_sort | enzyme promiscuity shapes adaptation to novel growth substrates |
topic | Reports |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6452873/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30962359 http://dx.doi.org/10.15252/msb.20188462 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT guzmangabrielai enzymepromiscuityshapesadaptationtonovelgrowthsubstrates AT sandbergtroye enzymepromiscuityshapesadaptationtonovelgrowthsubstrates AT lacroixryana enzymepromiscuityshapesadaptationtonovelgrowthsubstrates AT nyergesakos enzymepromiscuityshapesadaptationtonovelgrowthsubstrates AT papphenrietta enzymepromiscuityshapesadaptationtonovelgrowthsubstrates AT deraadmarkus enzymepromiscuityshapesadaptationtonovelgrowthsubstrates AT kingzacharya enzymepromiscuityshapesadaptationtonovelgrowthsubstrates AT hefnerying enzymepromiscuityshapesadaptationtonovelgrowthsubstrates AT northentrentr enzymepromiscuityshapesadaptationtonovelgrowthsubstrates AT notebaartricharda enzymepromiscuityshapesadaptationtonovelgrowthsubstrates AT palcsaba enzymepromiscuityshapesadaptationtonovelgrowthsubstrates AT palssonbernhardo enzymepromiscuityshapesadaptationtonovelgrowthsubstrates AT pappbalazs enzymepromiscuityshapesadaptationtonovelgrowthsubstrates AT feistadamm enzymepromiscuityshapesadaptationtonovelgrowthsubstrates |