Cargando…

A comparison of the initial orthotic effects of functional electrical stimulation and ankle-foot orthoses on the speed and oxygen cost of gait in multiple sclerosis

BACKGROUND: Foot drop affects walking in people with multiple sclerosis (pwMS). This study compares the initial orthotic effects of two treatments for foot drop: ankle-foot orthoses (AFO) and functional electrical stimulation (FES), on the speed and oxygen cost of walking in MS. METHOD AND MATERIALS...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: (Miller) Renfrew, Linda, Lord, Anna C, McFadyen, Angus K, Rafferty, Danny, Hunter, Rebecca, Bowers, Roy, Mattison, Paul, Moseley, Owen, Paul, Lorna
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6453037/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31191925
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2055668318755071
_version_ 1783409367629955072
author (Miller) Renfrew, Linda
Lord, Anna C
McFadyen, Angus K
Rafferty, Danny
Hunter, Rebecca
Bowers, Roy
Mattison, Paul
Moseley, Owen
Paul, Lorna
author_facet (Miller) Renfrew, Linda
Lord, Anna C
McFadyen, Angus K
Rafferty, Danny
Hunter, Rebecca
Bowers, Roy
Mattison, Paul
Moseley, Owen
Paul, Lorna
author_sort (Miller) Renfrew, Linda
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Foot drop affects walking in people with multiple sclerosis (pwMS). This study compares the initial orthotic effects of two treatments for foot drop: ankle-foot orthoses (AFO) and functional electrical stimulation (FES), on the speed and oxygen cost of walking in MS. METHOD AND MATERIALS: Seventy-eight pwMS were randomised to receive AFO or FES (ODFS PACE (OML, Salisbury, UK)). Participants completed the 25-ft walk test (25ftWT) and 5-min self-selected walk test (5minSSWT), from which oxygen cost was determined, with and without their device. Between-, within- and sub-group analyses (based on baseline walking speed of <0.8 m/s (slow) or ≥0.8 m/s (fast)) were undertaken. RESULTS: No significant differences between baseline measures were observed. The AFO group walked significantly slower than the FES group (5minSSWT, p = 0.037, 0.11 m/s). The AFO group walked significantly slower with than without AFO (25ftWT, p = 0.037), particularly in the fast-walking group ( p = 0.011). The slow-walking FES group walked significantly faster with FES than without (25ftWT; p = 0.029, 5minSSWT; p = 0.037). There were no differences in the fast-walking FES group or in the oxygen cost for either device. CONCLUSION: AFO reduced walking speed, particularly in fast walkers. FES increased walking speed in slow, but not fast walkers.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6453037
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64530372019-06-12 A comparison of the initial orthotic effects of functional electrical stimulation and ankle-foot orthoses on the speed and oxygen cost of gait in multiple sclerosis (Miller) Renfrew, Linda Lord, Anna C McFadyen, Angus K Rafferty, Danny Hunter, Rebecca Bowers, Roy Mattison, Paul Moseley, Owen Paul, Lorna J Rehabil Assist Technol Eng Special Collection: IFESS 2017 BACKGROUND: Foot drop affects walking in people with multiple sclerosis (pwMS). This study compares the initial orthotic effects of two treatments for foot drop: ankle-foot orthoses (AFO) and functional electrical stimulation (FES), on the speed and oxygen cost of walking in MS. METHOD AND MATERIALS: Seventy-eight pwMS were randomised to receive AFO or FES (ODFS PACE (OML, Salisbury, UK)). Participants completed the 25-ft walk test (25ftWT) and 5-min self-selected walk test (5minSSWT), from which oxygen cost was determined, with and without their device. Between-, within- and sub-group analyses (based on baseline walking speed of <0.8 m/s (slow) or ≥0.8 m/s (fast)) were undertaken. RESULTS: No significant differences between baseline measures were observed. The AFO group walked significantly slower than the FES group (5minSSWT, p = 0.037, 0.11 m/s). The AFO group walked significantly slower with than without AFO (25ftWT, p = 0.037), particularly in the fast-walking group ( p = 0.011). The slow-walking FES group walked significantly faster with FES than without (25ftWT; p = 0.029, 5minSSWT; p = 0.037). There were no differences in the fast-walking FES group or in the oxygen cost for either device. CONCLUSION: AFO reduced walking speed, particularly in fast walkers. FES increased walking speed in slow, but not fast walkers. SAGE Publications 2018-02-02 /pmc/articles/PMC6453037/ /pubmed/31191925 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2055668318755071 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ Creative Commons Non Commercial CC BY-NC: This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Special Collection: IFESS 2017
(Miller) Renfrew, Linda
Lord, Anna C
McFadyen, Angus K
Rafferty, Danny
Hunter, Rebecca
Bowers, Roy
Mattison, Paul
Moseley, Owen
Paul, Lorna
A comparison of the initial orthotic effects of functional electrical stimulation and ankle-foot orthoses on the speed and oxygen cost of gait in multiple sclerosis
title A comparison of the initial orthotic effects of functional electrical stimulation and ankle-foot orthoses on the speed and oxygen cost of gait in multiple sclerosis
title_full A comparison of the initial orthotic effects of functional electrical stimulation and ankle-foot orthoses on the speed and oxygen cost of gait in multiple sclerosis
title_fullStr A comparison of the initial orthotic effects of functional electrical stimulation and ankle-foot orthoses on the speed and oxygen cost of gait in multiple sclerosis
title_full_unstemmed A comparison of the initial orthotic effects of functional electrical stimulation and ankle-foot orthoses on the speed and oxygen cost of gait in multiple sclerosis
title_short A comparison of the initial orthotic effects of functional electrical stimulation and ankle-foot orthoses on the speed and oxygen cost of gait in multiple sclerosis
title_sort comparison of the initial orthotic effects of functional electrical stimulation and ankle-foot orthoses on the speed and oxygen cost of gait in multiple sclerosis
topic Special Collection: IFESS 2017
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6453037/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31191925
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2055668318755071
work_keys_str_mv AT millerrenfrewlinda acomparisonoftheinitialorthoticeffectsoffunctionalelectricalstimulationandanklefootorthosesonthespeedandoxygencostofgaitinmultiplesclerosis
AT lordannac acomparisonoftheinitialorthoticeffectsoffunctionalelectricalstimulationandanklefootorthosesonthespeedandoxygencostofgaitinmultiplesclerosis
AT mcfadyenangusk acomparisonoftheinitialorthoticeffectsoffunctionalelectricalstimulationandanklefootorthosesonthespeedandoxygencostofgaitinmultiplesclerosis
AT raffertydanny acomparisonoftheinitialorthoticeffectsoffunctionalelectricalstimulationandanklefootorthosesonthespeedandoxygencostofgaitinmultiplesclerosis
AT hunterrebecca acomparisonoftheinitialorthoticeffectsoffunctionalelectricalstimulationandanklefootorthosesonthespeedandoxygencostofgaitinmultiplesclerosis
AT bowersroy acomparisonoftheinitialorthoticeffectsoffunctionalelectricalstimulationandanklefootorthosesonthespeedandoxygencostofgaitinmultiplesclerosis
AT mattisonpaul acomparisonoftheinitialorthoticeffectsoffunctionalelectricalstimulationandanklefootorthosesonthespeedandoxygencostofgaitinmultiplesclerosis
AT moseleyowen acomparisonoftheinitialorthoticeffectsoffunctionalelectricalstimulationandanklefootorthosesonthespeedandoxygencostofgaitinmultiplesclerosis
AT paullorna acomparisonoftheinitialorthoticeffectsoffunctionalelectricalstimulationandanklefootorthosesonthespeedandoxygencostofgaitinmultiplesclerosis
AT millerrenfrewlinda comparisonoftheinitialorthoticeffectsoffunctionalelectricalstimulationandanklefootorthosesonthespeedandoxygencostofgaitinmultiplesclerosis
AT lordannac comparisonoftheinitialorthoticeffectsoffunctionalelectricalstimulationandanklefootorthosesonthespeedandoxygencostofgaitinmultiplesclerosis
AT mcfadyenangusk comparisonoftheinitialorthoticeffectsoffunctionalelectricalstimulationandanklefootorthosesonthespeedandoxygencostofgaitinmultiplesclerosis
AT raffertydanny comparisonoftheinitialorthoticeffectsoffunctionalelectricalstimulationandanklefootorthosesonthespeedandoxygencostofgaitinmultiplesclerosis
AT hunterrebecca comparisonoftheinitialorthoticeffectsoffunctionalelectricalstimulationandanklefootorthosesonthespeedandoxygencostofgaitinmultiplesclerosis
AT bowersroy comparisonoftheinitialorthoticeffectsoffunctionalelectricalstimulationandanklefootorthosesonthespeedandoxygencostofgaitinmultiplesclerosis
AT mattisonpaul comparisonoftheinitialorthoticeffectsoffunctionalelectricalstimulationandanklefootorthosesonthespeedandoxygencostofgaitinmultiplesclerosis
AT moseleyowen comparisonoftheinitialorthoticeffectsoffunctionalelectricalstimulationandanklefootorthosesonthespeedandoxygencostofgaitinmultiplesclerosis
AT paullorna comparisonoftheinitialorthoticeffectsoffunctionalelectricalstimulationandanklefootorthosesonthespeedandoxygencostofgaitinmultiplesclerosis