Cargando…
Comparison of a computerized algorithm and prosthetists’ judgment in rating functional levels based on daily step activity in transtibial amputees
The Medicare Functional Classification Levels: “K-Level” system is a standard scale for functional levels of amputees. But it is problematic to document objectively and reliably. The K-Levels are based on three characteristics: potential to ambulate, cadence variability and energy level of the amput...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6453046/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31186911 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2055668316670535 |
_version_ | 1783409369498517504 |
---|---|
author | Orendurff, Michael S Kobayashi, Toshiki Villarosa, Christopher Q Coleman, Kim L Boone, David A |
author_facet | Orendurff, Michael S Kobayashi, Toshiki Villarosa, Christopher Q Coleman, Kim L Boone, David A |
author_sort | Orendurff, Michael S |
collection | PubMed |
description | The Medicare Functional Classification Levels: “K-Level” system is a standard scale for functional levels of amputees. But it is problematic to document objectively and reliably. The K-Levels are based on three characteristics: potential to ambulate, cadence variability and energy level of the amputees. Actual mobility patterns of transtibial amputees recorded by a step activity monitor (StepWatch™) were translated using a computerized algorithm to match the three K-Level characteristics: the most active one minute, the ratio of low:medium:high step rates, and the total daily steps, respectively. This study compared prosthetists’ ratings of functional levels based on a visual inspection of step activity patterns with the ratings calculated by the computerized algorithm based on the same step activity data in 81 transtibial amputees. The computerized algorithm produced functional level values that closely matched the average of the ratings by 14 experienced prosthetists. The slope of the linear regression line was 1.04 with an R(2) value of 0.829, indicating good linearity and concordance across the range of the two scales. The results of this study demonstrated concurrent validity of the computerized algorithm and suggested that it could potentially serve as a useful tool in rating functional levels of transtibial amputees based on real-world step activities and complement a clinic-based test. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6453046 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-64530462019-06-11 Comparison of a computerized algorithm and prosthetists’ judgment in rating functional levels based on daily step activity in transtibial amputees Orendurff, Michael S Kobayashi, Toshiki Villarosa, Christopher Q Coleman, Kim L Boone, David A J Rehabil Assist Technol Eng Article The Medicare Functional Classification Levels: “K-Level” system is a standard scale for functional levels of amputees. But it is problematic to document objectively and reliably. The K-Levels are based on three characteristics: potential to ambulate, cadence variability and energy level of the amputees. Actual mobility patterns of transtibial amputees recorded by a step activity monitor (StepWatch™) were translated using a computerized algorithm to match the three K-Level characteristics: the most active one minute, the ratio of low:medium:high step rates, and the total daily steps, respectively. This study compared prosthetists’ ratings of functional levels based on a visual inspection of step activity patterns with the ratings calculated by the computerized algorithm based on the same step activity data in 81 transtibial amputees. The computerized algorithm produced functional level values that closely matched the average of the ratings by 14 experienced prosthetists. The slope of the linear regression line was 1.04 with an R(2) value of 0.829, indicating good linearity and concordance across the range of the two scales. The results of this study demonstrated concurrent validity of the computerized algorithm and suggested that it could potentially serve as a useful tool in rating functional levels of transtibial amputees based on real-world step activities and complement a clinic-based test. SAGE Publications 2016-10-10 /pmc/articles/PMC6453046/ /pubmed/31186911 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2055668316670535 Text en © The Author(s) 2016 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). |
spellingShingle | Article Orendurff, Michael S Kobayashi, Toshiki Villarosa, Christopher Q Coleman, Kim L Boone, David A Comparison of a computerized algorithm and prosthetists’ judgment in rating functional levels based on daily step activity in transtibial amputees |
title | Comparison of a computerized algorithm and prosthetists’ judgment in
rating functional levels based on daily step activity in transtibial
amputees |
title_full | Comparison of a computerized algorithm and prosthetists’ judgment in
rating functional levels based on daily step activity in transtibial
amputees |
title_fullStr | Comparison of a computerized algorithm and prosthetists’ judgment in
rating functional levels based on daily step activity in transtibial
amputees |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of a computerized algorithm and prosthetists’ judgment in
rating functional levels based on daily step activity in transtibial
amputees |
title_short | Comparison of a computerized algorithm and prosthetists’ judgment in
rating functional levels based on daily step activity in transtibial
amputees |
title_sort | comparison of a computerized algorithm and prosthetists’ judgment in
rating functional levels based on daily step activity in transtibial
amputees |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6453046/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31186911 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2055668316670535 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT orendurffmichaels comparisonofacomputerizedalgorithmandprosthetistsjudgmentinratingfunctionallevelsbasedondailystepactivityintranstibialamputees AT kobayashitoshiki comparisonofacomputerizedalgorithmandprosthetistsjudgmentinratingfunctionallevelsbasedondailystepactivityintranstibialamputees AT villarosachristopherq comparisonofacomputerizedalgorithmandprosthetistsjudgmentinratingfunctionallevelsbasedondailystepactivityintranstibialamputees AT colemankiml comparisonofacomputerizedalgorithmandprosthetistsjudgmentinratingfunctionallevelsbasedondailystepactivityintranstibialamputees AT boonedavida comparisonofacomputerizedalgorithmandprosthetistsjudgmentinratingfunctionallevelsbasedondailystepactivityintranstibialamputees |