Cargando…

Monitoring activity of inpatient lower limb prosthetic users in rehabilitation using accelerometry: Validation study

PURPOSE: Due to limited accuracy of self-reported activities of lower limb prosthetic users, there is increasing interest in providing accurate walking time for those who are mobilising using their prosthesis in the rehabilitation ward. The aim of this study was to test the accuracy of a tri axial a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Salih, Salih A, Peel, Nancye M, Burgess, Kara
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6453055/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31186902
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2055668316642387
_version_ 1783409371570503680
author Salih, Salih A
Peel, Nancye M
Burgess, Kara
author_facet Salih, Salih A
Peel, Nancye M
Burgess, Kara
author_sort Salih, Salih A
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Due to limited accuracy of self-reported activities of lower limb prosthetic users, there is increasing interest in providing accurate walking time for those who are mobilising using their prosthesis in the rehabilitation ward. The aim of this study was to test the accuracy of a tri axial accelerometer (ActivPAL) in measuring walking activity of amputee patients while using their prosthetic limb. METHOD: For the study, 21 subjects wore accelerometer devices taped to the thigh on both the amputated and non-amputated side. Each subject was asked to perform a set of activity routines: walking with prosthesis for 5 minutes, self-propelling in a wheel chair for 3 minutes and being pushed in a wheel chair for 3 minutes. Each activity was observed and timed by a physiotherapist and the observed times were compared with the output from accelerometer monitoring. RESULTS: Using the Bland–Altman method, the mean difference between observed and ActivPal monitor for total time spent walking for the non-amputated side was 0.004 seconds (limits of agreement −0.09 to 0.10 seconds) and for amputated side was 0.11 seconds (limits of agreement −0.43 to 0.66 seconds). An analysis between monitored and observed time found the sensitivity for the non-amputated side was 90.5% and 86% for the amputated side. CONCLUSION: The use of ActivPAL accelerometers in measuring walking time for an individual using a prosthesis is within acceptable levels of accuracy for continuous ambulation monitoring. It has potentially important clinical application for prescribing prostheses.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6453055
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64530552019-06-11 Monitoring activity of inpatient lower limb prosthetic users in rehabilitation using accelerometry: Validation study Salih, Salih A Peel, Nancye M Burgess, Kara J Rehabil Assist Technol Eng Article PURPOSE: Due to limited accuracy of self-reported activities of lower limb prosthetic users, there is increasing interest in providing accurate walking time for those who are mobilising using their prosthesis in the rehabilitation ward. The aim of this study was to test the accuracy of a tri axial accelerometer (ActivPAL) in measuring walking activity of amputee patients while using their prosthetic limb. METHOD: For the study, 21 subjects wore accelerometer devices taped to the thigh on both the amputated and non-amputated side. Each subject was asked to perform a set of activity routines: walking with prosthesis for 5 minutes, self-propelling in a wheel chair for 3 minutes and being pushed in a wheel chair for 3 minutes. Each activity was observed and timed by a physiotherapist and the observed times were compared with the output from accelerometer monitoring. RESULTS: Using the Bland–Altman method, the mean difference between observed and ActivPal monitor for total time spent walking for the non-amputated side was 0.004 seconds (limits of agreement −0.09 to 0.10 seconds) and for amputated side was 0.11 seconds (limits of agreement −0.43 to 0.66 seconds). An analysis between monitored and observed time found the sensitivity for the non-amputated side was 90.5% and 86% for the amputated side. CONCLUSION: The use of ActivPAL accelerometers in measuring walking time for an individual using a prosthesis is within acceptable levels of accuracy for continuous ambulation monitoring. It has potentially important clinical application for prescribing prostheses. SAGE Publications 2016-05-05 /pmc/articles/PMC6453055/ /pubmed/31186902 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2055668316642387 Text en © The Author(s) 2016 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page(https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Article
Salih, Salih A
Peel, Nancye M
Burgess, Kara
Monitoring activity of inpatient lower limb prosthetic users in rehabilitation using accelerometry: Validation study
title Monitoring activity of inpatient lower limb prosthetic users in rehabilitation using accelerometry: Validation study
title_full Monitoring activity of inpatient lower limb prosthetic users in rehabilitation using accelerometry: Validation study
title_fullStr Monitoring activity of inpatient lower limb prosthetic users in rehabilitation using accelerometry: Validation study
title_full_unstemmed Monitoring activity of inpatient lower limb prosthetic users in rehabilitation using accelerometry: Validation study
title_short Monitoring activity of inpatient lower limb prosthetic users in rehabilitation using accelerometry: Validation study
title_sort monitoring activity of inpatient lower limb prosthetic users in rehabilitation using accelerometry: validation study
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6453055/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31186902
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2055668316642387
work_keys_str_mv AT salihsaliha monitoringactivityofinpatientlowerlimbprostheticusersinrehabilitationusingaccelerometryvalidationstudy
AT peelnancyem monitoringactivityofinpatientlowerlimbprostheticusersinrehabilitationusingaccelerometryvalidationstudy
AT burgesskara monitoringactivityofinpatientlowerlimbprostheticusersinrehabilitationusingaccelerometryvalidationstudy