Cargando…
Stochastically modulated inter-pulse intervals to increase the efficiency of functional electrical stimulation cycling
INTRODUCTION: Functional electrical stimulation cycling has various health benefits, but the mechanical power output and efficiency are very low compared to volitional muscle activation. Stimulation with variable frequency showed significantly higher power output values in experiments with a knee dy...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6453100/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31191935 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2055668318767364 |
_version_ | 1783409381826625536 |
---|---|
author | Aksöz, EA Luder, MA Laubacher, M Riener, R Binder-Macleod, SA Hunt, KJ |
author_facet | Aksöz, EA Luder, MA Laubacher, M Riener, R Binder-Macleod, SA Hunt, KJ |
author_sort | Aksöz, EA |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Functional electrical stimulation cycling has various health benefits, but the mechanical power output and efficiency are very low compared to volitional muscle activation. Stimulation with variable frequency showed significantly higher power output values in experiments with a knee dynamometer. The aim of the present work was to compare stochastic modulation of inter-pulse interval to constant inter-pulse interval stimulation during functional electrical stimulation cycling. METHODS: Seventeen able-bodied subjects participated (n = 17). Quadriceps and hamstring muscle groups were stimulated with two activation patterns: P1-constant frequency, P2-stochastic inter-pulse interval. Power output was measured on functional electrical stimulation ergometer. RESULTS: Overall, mean power output with the stochastically modulated pattern P2 was lower than with P1 (12.57 ± 3.74 W vs. 11.44 ± 3.81 W, P1 vs. P2, p = 0.022), but no significant differences during the first 30 s and the last 30 s were observed. CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that stimulation strategies that use randomized modulation of inter-pulse intervals can negatively affect power output generation during functional electrical stimulation cycling. To minimise voluntary contractions, power measurement and assessment should be focused on the periods where only the quadriceps are stimulated. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6453100 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-64531002019-06-12 Stochastically modulated inter-pulse intervals to increase the efficiency of functional electrical stimulation cycling Aksöz, EA Luder, MA Laubacher, M Riener, R Binder-Macleod, SA Hunt, KJ J Rehabil Assist Technol Eng Special Collection: IFESS 2017 INTRODUCTION: Functional electrical stimulation cycling has various health benefits, but the mechanical power output and efficiency are very low compared to volitional muscle activation. Stimulation with variable frequency showed significantly higher power output values in experiments with a knee dynamometer. The aim of the present work was to compare stochastic modulation of inter-pulse interval to constant inter-pulse interval stimulation during functional electrical stimulation cycling. METHODS: Seventeen able-bodied subjects participated (n = 17). Quadriceps and hamstring muscle groups were stimulated with two activation patterns: P1-constant frequency, P2-stochastic inter-pulse interval. Power output was measured on functional electrical stimulation ergometer. RESULTS: Overall, mean power output with the stochastically modulated pattern P2 was lower than with P1 (12.57 ± 3.74 W vs. 11.44 ± 3.81 W, P1 vs. P2, p = 0.022), but no significant differences during the first 30 s and the last 30 s were observed. CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that stimulation strategies that use randomized modulation of inter-pulse intervals can negatively affect power output generation during functional electrical stimulation cycling. To minimise voluntary contractions, power measurement and assessment should be focused on the periods where only the quadriceps are stimulated. SAGE Publications 2018-04-11 /pmc/articles/PMC6453100/ /pubmed/31191935 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2055668318767364 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ Creative Commons Non Commercial CC BY-NC: This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). |
spellingShingle | Special Collection: IFESS 2017 Aksöz, EA Luder, MA Laubacher, M Riener, R Binder-Macleod, SA Hunt, KJ Stochastically modulated inter-pulse intervals to increase the efficiency of functional electrical stimulation cycling |
title | Stochastically modulated inter-pulse intervals to increase the
efficiency of functional electrical stimulation cycling |
title_full | Stochastically modulated inter-pulse intervals to increase the
efficiency of functional electrical stimulation cycling |
title_fullStr | Stochastically modulated inter-pulse intervals to increase the
efficiency of functional electrical stimulation cycling |
title_full_unstemmed | Stochastically modulated inter-pulse intervals to increase the
efficiency of functional electrical stimulation cycling |
title_short | Stochastically modulated inter-pulse intervals to increase the
efficiency of functional electrical stimulation cycling |
title_sort | stochastically modulated inter-pulse intervals to increase the
efficiency of functional electrical stimulation cycling |
topic | Special Collection: IFESS 2017 |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6453100/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31191935 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2055668318767364 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT aksozea stochasticallymodulatedinterpulseintervalstoincreasetheefficiencyoffunctionalelectricalstimulationcycling AT luderma stochasticallymodulatedinterpulseintervalstoincreasetheefficiencyoffunctionalelectricalstimulationcycling AT laubacherm stochasticallymodulatedinterpulseintervalstoincreasetheefficiencyoffunctionalelectricalstimulationcycling AT rienerr stochasticallymodulatedinterpulseintervalstoincreasetheefficiencyoffunctionalelectricalstimulationcycling AT bindermacleodsa stochasticallymodulatedinterpulseintervalstoincreasetheefficiencyoffunctionalelectricalstimulationcycling AT huntkj stochasticallymodulatedinterpulseintervalstoincreasetheefficiencyoffunctionalelectricalstimulationcycling |