Cargando…

Stochastically modulated inter-pulse intervals to increase the efficiency of functional electrical stimulation cycling

INTRODUCTION: Functional electrical stimulation cycling has various health benefits, but the mechanical power output and efficiency are very low compared to volitional muscle activation. Stimulation with variable frequency showed significantly higher power output values in experiments with a knee dy...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Aksöz, EA, Luder, MA, Laubacher, M, Riener, R, Binder-Macleod, SA, Hunt, KJ
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6453100/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31191935
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2055668318767364
_version_ 1783409381826625536
author Aksöz, EA
Luder, MA
Laubacher, M
Riener, R
Binder-Macleod, SA
Hunt, KJ
author_facet Aksöz, EA
Luder, MA
Laubacher, M
Riener, R
Binder-Macleod, SA
Hunt, KJ
author_sort Aksöz, EA
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Functional electrical stimulation cycling has various health benefits, but the mechanical power output and efficiency are very low compared to volitional muscle activation. Stimulation with variable frequency showed significantly higher power output values in experiments with a knee dynamometer. The aim of the present work was to compare stochastic modulation of inter-pulse interval to constant inter-pulse interval stimulation during functional electrical stimulation cycling. METHODS: Seventeen able-bodied subjects participated (n = 17). Quadriceps and hamstring muscle groups were stimulated with two activation patterns: P1-constant frequency, P2-stochastic inter-pulse interval. Power output was measured on functional electrical stimulation ergometer. RESULTS: Overall, mean power output with the stochastically modulated pattern P2 was lower than with P1 (12.57 ± 3.74 W vs. 11.44 ± 3.81 W, P1 vs. P2, p = 0.022), but no significant differences during the first 30 s and the last 30 s were observed. CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that stimulation strategies that use randomized modulation of inter-pulse intervals can negatively affect power output generation during functional electrical stimulation cycling. To minimise voluntary contractions, power measurement and assessment should be focused on the periods where only the quadriceps are stimulated.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6453100
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64531002019-06-12 Stochastically modulated inter-pulse intervals to increase the efficiency of functional electrical stimulation cycling Aksöz, EA Luder, MA Laubacher, M Riener, R Binder-Macleod, SA Hunt, KJ J Rehabil Assist Technol Eng Special Collection: IFESS 2017 INTRODUCTION: Functional electrical stimulation cycling has various health benefits, but the mechanical power output and efficiency are very low compared to volitional muscle activation. Stimulation with variable frequency showed significantly higher power output values in experiments with a knee dynamometer. The aim of the present work was to compare stochastic modulation of inter-pulse interval to constant inter-pulse interval stimulation during functional electrical stimulation cycling. METHODS: Seventeen able-bodied subjects participated (n = 17). Quadriceps and hamstring muscle groups were stimulated with two activation patterns: P1-constant frequency, P2-stochastic inter-pulse interval. Power output was measured on functional electrical stimulation ergometer. RESULTS: Overall, mean power output with the stochastically modulated pattern P2 was lower than with P1 (12.57 ± 3.74 W vs. 11.44 ± 3.81 W, P1 vs. P2, p = 0.022), but no significant differences during the first 30 s and the last 30 s were observed. CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that stimulation strategies that use randomized modulation of inter-pulse intervals can negatively affect power output generation during functional electrical stimulation cycling. To minimise voluntary contractions, power measurement and assessment should be focused on the periods where only the quadriceps are stimulated. SAGE Publications 2018-04-11 /pmc/articles/PMC6453100/ /pubmed/31191935 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2055668318767364 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ Creative Commons Non Commercial CC BY-NC: This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Special Collection: IFESS 2017
Aksöz, EA
Luder, MA
Laubacher, M
Riener, R
Binder-Macleod, SA
Hunt, KJ
Stochastically modulated inter-pulse intervals to increase the efficiency of functional electrical stimulation cycling
title Stochastically modulated inter-pulse intervals to increase the efficiency of functional electrical stimulation cycling
title_full Stochastically modulated inter-pulse intervals to increase the efficiency of functional electrical stimulation cycling
title_fullStr Stochastically modulated inter-pulse intervals to increase the efficiency of functional electrical stimulation cycling
title_full_unstemmed Stochastically modulated inter-pulse intervals to increase the efficiency of functional electrical stimulation cycling
title_short Stochastically modulated inter-pulse intervals to increase the efficiency of functional electrical stimulation cycling
title_sort stochastically modulated inter-pulse intervals to increase the efficiency of functional electrical stimulation cycling
topic Special Collection: IFESS 2017
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6453100/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31191935
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2055668318767364
work_keys_str_mv AT aksozea stochasticallymodulatedinterpulseintervalstoincreasetheefficiencyoffunctionalelectricalstimulationcycling
AT luderma stochasticallymodulatedinterpulseintervalstoincreasetheefficiencyoffunctionalelectricalstimulationcycling
AT laubacherm stochasticallymodulatedinterpulseintervalstoincreasetheefficiencyoffunctionalelectricalstimulationcycling
AT rienerr stochasticallymodulatedinterpulseintervalstoincreasetheefficiencyoffunctionalelectricalstimulationcycling
AT bindermacleodsa stochasticallymodulatedinterpulseintervalstoincreasetheefficiencyoffunctionalelectricalstimulationcycling
AT huntkj stochasticallymodulatedinterpulseintervalstoincreasetheefficiencyoffunctionalelectricalstimulationcycling