Cargando…

Comparative performance evaluation of four commercial multiplex real-time PCR assays for the detection of the diarrhoea-causing protozoa Cryptosporidium hominis/parvum, Giardia duodenalis and Entamoeba histolytica

BACKGROUND: Multiplex molecular panels are relentlessly replacing conventional methods for the detection of enteric pathogens from stool samples in clinical and research laboratories. Here we evaluated four commercial multiplex real-time PCR assays for the detection of Cryptosporidium hominis/parvum...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Paulos, Silvia, Saugar, José María, de Lucio, Aida, Fuentes, Isabel, Mateo, María, Carmena, David
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6453453/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30958837
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0215068
_version_ 1783409399282270208
author Paulos, Silvia
Saugar, José María
de Lucio, Aida
Fuentes, Isabel
Mateo, María
Carmena, David
author_facet Paulos, Silvia
Saugar, José María
de Lucio, Aida
Fuentes, Isabel
Mateo, María
Carmena, David
author_sort Paulos, Silvia
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Multiplex molecular panels are relentlessly replacing conventional methods for the detection of enteric pathogens from stool samples in clinical and research laboratories. Here we evaluated four commercial multiplex real-time PCR assays for the detection of Cryptosporidium hominis/parvum, Giardia duodenalis and Entamoeba histolytica. METHODS: The diagnostic performance of the Gastroenteritis/Parasite Panel I (Diagenode), the RIDAGENE Parasitic Stool Panel (R-Biopharm), the Allplex Gastrointestinal Parasite Panel 4 (Seegene) and the FTD Stool Parasites (Fast Track) real-time PCR methods was assessed against a reference panel of 126 well-characterized DNA samples including Cryptosporidium hominis (n = 29), Cryptosporidium parvum (n = 3), Giardia duodenalis (n = 47), Entamoeba histolytica (n = 3), other parasite species (n = 20), and apparently healthy subjects (n = 24). PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Obtained diagnostic sensitivities ranged from 53–88% for Cryptosporidium hominis/parvum, and from 68–100% for G. duodenalis. The R-Biopharm method achieved the best performance for the detection of Cryptosporidium hominis/parvum both in terms of diagnostic sensitivity (87.5%) and detection limit (a 100-fold increase compared to other tests). The Fast Track method was particularly suited for the detection of G. duodenalis, achieving a 100% sensitivity and a detection limit at least 10-fold superior. Detection of E. histolytica was similarly achieved by all compared methods except Diagenode. CONCLUSIONS: Diagnostic performance varied largely depending on the method used and the targeted pathogen species. Factors including test sensitivity/specificity, cost, patient population surveyed, laboratory workflow, and diagnostic algorithm should be carefully considered when choosing the most appropriate multiplex PCR platform.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6453453
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64534532019-04-19 Comparative performance evaluation of four commercial multiplex real-time PCR assays for the detection of the diarrhoea-causing protozoa Cryptosporidium hominis/parvum, Giardia duodenalis and Entamoeba histolytica Paulos, Silvia Saugar, José María de Lucio, Aida Fuentes, Isabel Mateo, María Carmena, David PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Multiplex molecular panels are relentlessly replacing conventional methods for the detection of enteric pathogens from stool samples in clinical and research laboratories. Here we evaluated four commercial multiplex real-time PCR assays for the detection of Cryptosporidium hominis/parvum, Giardia duodenalis and Entamoeba histolytica. METHODS: The diagnostic performance of the Gastroenteritis/Parasite Panel I (Diagenode), the RIDAGENE Parasitic Stool Panel (R-Biopharm), the Allplex Gastrointestinal Parasite Panel 4 (Seegene) and the FTD Stool Parasites (Fast Track) real-time PCR methods was assessed against a reference panel of 126 well-characterized DNA samples including Cryptosporidium hominis (n = 29), Cryptosporidium parvum (n = 3), Giardia duodenalis (n = 47), Entamoeba histolytica (n = 3), other parasite species (n = 20), and apparently healthy subjects (n = 24). PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Obtained diagnostic sensitivities ranged from 53–88% for Cryptosporidium hominis/parvum, and from 68–100% for G. duodenalis. The R-Biopharm method achieved the best performance for the detection of Cryptosporidium hominis/parvum both in terms of diagnostic sensitivity (87.5%) and detection limit (a 100-fold increase compared to other tests). The Fast Track method was particularly suited for the detection of G. duodenalis, achieving a 100% sensitivity and a detection limit at least 10-fold superior. Detection of E. histolytica was similarly achieved by all compared methods except Diagenode. CONCLUSIONS: Diagnostic performance varied largely depending on the method used and the targeted pathogen species. Factors including test sensitivity/specificity, cost, patient population surveyed, laboratory workflow, and diagnostic algorithm should be carefully considered when choosing the most appropriate multiplex PCR platform. Public Library of Science 2019-04-08 /pmc/articles/PMC6453453/ /pubmed/30958837 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0215068 Text en © 2019 Paulos et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Paulos, Silvia
Saugar, José María
de Lucio, Aida
Fuentes, Isabel
Mateo, María
Carmena, David
Comparative performance evaluation of four commercial multiplex real-time PCR assays for the detection of the diarrhoea-causing protozoa Cryptosporidium hominis/parvum, Giardia duodenalis and Entamoeba histolytica
title Comparative performance evaluation of four commercial multiplex real-time PCR assays for the detection of the diarrhoea-causing protozoa Cryptosporidium hominis/parvum, Giardia duodenalis and Entamoeba histolytica
title_full Comparative performance evaluation of four commercial multiplex real-time PCR assays for the detection of the diarrhoea-causing protozoa Cryptosporidium hominis/parvum, Giardia duodenalis and Entamoeba histolytica
title_fullStr Comparative performance evaluation of four commercial multiplex real-time PCR assays for the detection of the diarrhoea-causing protozoa Cryptosporidium hominis/parvum, Giardia duodenalis and Entamoeba histolytica
title_full_unstemmed Comparative performance evaluation of four commercial multiplex real-time PCR assays for the detection of the diarrhoea-causing protozoa Cryptosporidium hominis/parvum, Giardia duodenalis and Entamoeba histolytica
title_short Comparative performance evaluation of four commercial multiplex real-time PCR assays for the detection of the diarrhoea-causing protozoa Cryptosporidium hominis/parvum, Giardia duodenalis and Entamoeba histolytica
title_sort comparative performance evaluation of four commercial multiplex real-time pcr assays for the detection of the diarrhoea-causing protozoa cryptosporidium hominis/parvum, giardia duodenalis and entamoeba histolytica
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6453453/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30958837
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0215068
work_keys_str_mv AT paulossilvia comparativeperformanceevaluationoffourcommercialmultiplexrealtimepcrassaysforthedetectionofthediarrhoeacausingprotozoacryptosporidiumhominisparvumgiardiaduodenalisandentamoebahistolytica
AT saugarjosemaria comparativeperformanceevaluationoffourcommercialmultiplexrealtimepcrassaysforthedetectionofthediarrhoeacausingprotozoacryptosporidiumhominisparvumgiardiaduodenalisandentamoebahistolytica
AT delucioaida comparativeperformanceevaluationoffourcommercialmultiplexrealtimepcrassaysforthedetectionofthediarrhoeacausingprotozoacryptosporidiumhominisparvumgiardiaduodenalisandentamoebahistolytica
AT fuentesisabel comparativeperformanceevaluationoffourcommercialmultiplexrealtimepcrassaysforthedetectionofthediarrhoeacausingprotozoacryptosporidiumhominisparvumgiardiaduodenalisandentamoebahistolytica
AT mateomaria comparativeperformanceevaluationoffourcommercialmultiplexrealtimepcrassaysforthedetectionofthediarrhoeacausingprotozoacryptosporidiumhominisparvumgiardiaduodenalisandentamoebahistolytica
AT carmenadavid comparativeperformanceevaluationoffourcommercialmultiplexrealtimepcrassaysforthedetectionofthediarrhoeacausingprotozoacryptosporidiumhominisparvumgiardiaduodenalisandentamoebahistolytica