Cargando…

Barriers and enablers to adolescent self-consent for vaccination: A mixed-methods evidence synthesis

INTRODUCTION: The recent global expansion of routine adolescent vaccination programmes has the potential to protect young people against infectious diseases and improve their health. Although the legal framework in many countries permits young people to consent for vaccinations if competent, lack of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fisher, Harriet, Harding, Sarah, Hickman, Matthew, Macleod, John, Audrey, Suzanne
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier Science 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6453814/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30573357
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2018.12.007
_version_ 1783409440338214912
author Fisher, Harriet
Harding, Sarah
Hickman, Matthew
Macleod, John
Audrey, Suzanne
author_facet Fisher, Harriet
Harding, Sarah
Hickman, Matthew
Macleod, John
Audrey, Suzanne
author_sort Fisher, Harriet
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: The recent global expansion of routine adolescent vaccination programmes has the potential to protect young people against infectious diseases and improve their health. Although the legal framework in many countries permits young people to consent for vaccinations if competent, lack of written parental consent can still prevent uptake. We aimed to review systematically the associated barriers and enablers to implementation of adolescent self-consent procedures. METHODS: A comprehensive search strategy of ten databases from inception to June 2018 was undertaken to identify relevant qualitative and quantitative studies. Titles, abstracts and full texts were assessed for eligibility, and the methodological quality of eligible primary studies evaluated. Thematic synthesis methods were used to interpret and combine qualitative data, and to identify overarching themes as well as similarities and differences within themes. Quantitative data were summarised and, because the data were sufficiently similar in focus, were integrated within the qualitative framework. RESULTS: Twenty-five publications related to 23 studies were included. Three themes were identified which related to the policy framework, protection, and self-determination. Despite supportive national policy frameworks, implementation of adolescent self-consent procedures can be prevented by local policies, professionals’ misunderstandings of the legal framework and the context in which the vaccination programme is delivered. Motivation to protect young people’s health increased acceptability of adolescent self-consent, but implementation might be prevented to protect the reputation of professionals or relationships with parents. Further, maintaining the role of parents as decision-makers for their child’s healthcare was frequently prioritised over enabling young people’s autonomy to consent. CONCLUSIONS: Barriers to the implementation of adolescent self-consent procedures have implications for young people’s health and uptake of vaccination programmes. There is a need to clarify the policy framework and challenge the primacy of parental consent. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42017084509.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6453814
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Elsevier Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64538142019-04-19 Barriers and enablers to adolescent self-consent for vaccination: A mixed-methods evidence synthesis Fisher, Harriet Harding, Sarah Hickman, Matthew Macleod, John Audrey, Suzanne Vaccine Article INTRODUCTION: The recent global expansion of routine adolescent vaccination programmes has the potential to protect young people against infectious diseases and improve their health. Although the legal framework in many countries permits young people to consent for vaccinations if competent, lack of written parental consent can still prevent uptake. We aimed to review systematically the associated barriers and enablers to implementation of adolescent self-consent procedures. METHODS: A comprehensive search strategy of ten databases from inception to June 2018 was undertaken to identify relevant qualitative and quantitative studies. Titles, abstracts and full texts were assessed for eligibility, and the methodological quality of eligible primary studies evaluated. Thematic synthesis methods were used to interpret and combine qualitative data, and to identify overarching themes as well as similarities and differences within themes. Quantitative data were summarised and, because the data were sufficiently similar in focus, were integrated within the qualitative framework. RESULTS: Twenty-five publications related to 23 studies were included. Three themes were identified which related to the policy framework, protection, and self-determination. Despite supportive national policy frameworks, implementation of adolescent self-consent procedures can be prevented by local policies, professionals’ misunderstandings of the legal framework and the context in which the vaccination programme is delivered. Motivation to protect young people’s health increased acceptability of adolescent self-consent, but implementation might be prevented to protect the reputation of professionals or relationships with parents. Further, maintaining the role of parents as decision-makers for their child’s healthcare was frequently prioritised over enabling young people’s autonomy to consent. CONCLUSIONS: Barriers to the implementation of adolescent self-consent procedures have implications for young people’s health and uptake of vaccination programmes. There is a need to clarify the policy framework and challenge the primacy of parental consent. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42017084509. Elsevier Science 2019-01-14 /pmc/articles/PMC6453814/ /pubmed/30573357 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2018.12.007 Text en © 2018 The Author(s) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Fisher, Harriet
Harding, Sarah
Hickman, Matthew
Macleod, John
Audrey, Suzanne
Barriers and enablers to adolescent self-consent for vaccination: A mixed-methods evidence synthesis
title Barriers and enablers to adolescent self-consent for vaccination: A mixed-methods evidence synthesis
title_full Barriers and enablers to adolescent self-consent for vaccination: A mixed-methods evidence synthesis
title_fullStr Barriers and enablers to adolescent self-consent for vaccination: A mixed-methods evidence synthesis
title_full_unstemmed Barriers and enablers to adolescent self-consent for vaccination: A mixed-methods evidence synthesis
title_short Barriers and enablers to adolescent self-consent for vaccination: A mixed-methods evidence synthesis
title_sort barriers and enablers to adolescent self-consent for vaccination: a mixed-methods evidence synthesis
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6453814/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30573357
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2018.12.007
work_keys_str_mv AT fisherharriet barriersandenablerstoadolescentselfconsentforvaccinationamixedmethodsevidencesynthesis
AT hardingsarah barriersandenablerstoadolescentselfconsentforvaccinationamixedmethodsevidencesynthesis
AT hickmanmatthew barriersandenablerstoadolescentselfconsentforvaccinationamixedmethodsevidencesynthesis
AT macleodjohn barriersandenablerstoadolescentselfconsentforvaccinationamixedmethodsevidencesynthesis
AT audreysuzanne barriersandenablerstoadolescentselfconsentforvaccinationamixedmethodsevidencesynthesis