Cargando…

Million Visual Analogue Scale Questionnaire: Validation of the Persian Version

STUDY DESIGN: Descriptive cross-sectional study. PURPOSE: To validate the Persian version of the Million Visual Analogue Scale Questionnaire (MVAS), a self-administered low back pain (LBP) questionnaire. OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE: The majority of LBP questionnaires translated into Persian evaluate the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Akbari, Hesam, Ghasemi, Mohammad, Yegani, Taha, Fesharaki, Mohammad Gholami, Saraei, Maryam, Barsam, Yalda, Akbari, Hamed
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Korean Society of Spine Surgery 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6454270/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30481975
http://dx.doi.org/10.31616/asj.2018.0223
_version_ 1783409543269580800
author Akbari, Hesam
Ghasemi, Mohammad
Yegani, Taha
Fesharaki, Mohammad Gholami
Saraei, Maryam
Barsam, Yalda
Akbari, Hamed
author_facet Akbari, Hesam
Ghasemi, Mohammad
Yegani, Taha
Fesharaki, Mohammad Gholami
Saraei, Maryam
Barsam, Yalda
Akbari, Hamed
author_sort Akbari, Hesam
collection PubMed
description STUDY DESIGN: Descriptive cross-sectional study. PURPOSE: To validate the Persian version of the Million Visual Analogue Scale Questionnaire (MVAS), a self-administered low back pain (LBP) questionnaire. OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE: The majority of LBP questionnaires translated into Persian evaluate the impact of LBP on daily living. The MVAS is one of the most commonly used self-administered LBP questionnaires, and was developed to assess a different direction and effect of activities of daily living on LBP intensity. METHODS: The questionnaire was translated into Persian with the forward-backward method and was administered to 150 patients randomly sampled from an occupational medicine clinic in Tehran in 2017. RESULTS: Cronbach’s alpha for all subscales ranged between 0.670 and 0.799. Confirmatory factor analysis showed adequate construct validity of the Persian version of the MVAS, with root mean square error of approximation 0.046, goodness of fit index 0.902, and comparative fit index 0.969. Other indexes were satisfactory. CONCLUSIONS: The Persian MVAS is a valid and reliable instrument that can assess the effect of various daily activities on the intensity of LBP.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6454270
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Korean Society of Spine Surgery
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64542702019-04-19 Million Visual Analogue Scale Questionnaire: Validation of the Persian Version Akbari, Hesam Ghasemi, Mohammad Yegani, Taha Fesharaki, Mohammad Gholami Saraei, Maryam Barsam, Yalda Akbari, Hamed Asian Spine J Clinical Study STUDY DESIGN: Descriptive cross-sectional study. PURPOSE: To validate the Persian version of the Million Visual Analogue Scale Questionnaire (MVAS), a self-administered low back pain (LBP) questionnaire. OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE: The majority of LBP questionnaires translated into Persian evaluate the impact of LBP on daily living. The MVAS is one of the most commonly used self-administered LBP questionnaires, and was developed to assess a different direction and effect of activities of daily living on LBP intensity. METHODS: The questionnaire was translated into Persian with the forward-backward method and was administered to 150 patients randomly sampled from an occupational medicine clinic in Tehran in 2017. RESULTS: Cronbach’s alpha for all subscales ranged between 0.670 and 0.799. Confirmatory factor analysis showed adequate construct validity of the Persian version of the MVAS, with root mean square error of approximation 0.046, goodness of fit index 0.902, and comparative fit index 0.969. Other indexes were satisfactory. CONCLUSIONS: The Persian MVAS is a valid and reliable instrument that can assess the effect of various daily activities on the intensity of LBP. Korean Society of Spine Surgery 2019-04 2018-11-29 /pmc/articles/PMC6454270/ /pubmed/30481975 http://dx.doi.org/10.31616/asj.2018.0223 Text en Copyright © 2019 by Korean Society of Spine Surgery This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Clinical Study
Akbari, Hesam
Ghasemi, Mohammad
Yegani, Taha
Fesharaki, Mohammad Gholami
Saraei, Maryam
Barsam, Yalda
Akbari, Hamed
Million Visual Analogue Scale Questionnaire: Validation of the Persian Version
title Million Visual Analogue Scale Questionnaire: Validation of the Persian Version
title_full Million Visual Analogue Scale Questionnaire: Validation of the Persian Version
title_fullStr Million Visual Analogue Scale Questionnaire: Validation of the Persian Version
title_full_unstemmed Million Visual Analogue Scale Questionnaire: Validation of the Persian Version
title_short Million Visual Analogue Scale Questionnaire: Validation of the Persian Version
title_sort million visual analogue scale questionnaire: validation of the persian version
topic Clinical Study
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6454270/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30481975
http://dx.doi.org/10.31616/asj.2018.0223
work_keys_str_mv AT akbarihesam millionvisualanaloguescalequestionnairevalidationofthepersianversion
AT ghasemimohammad millionvisualanaloguescalequestionnairevalidationofthepersianversion
AT yeganitaha millionvisualanaloguescalequestionnairevalidationofthepersianversion
AT fesharakimohammadgholami millionvisualanaloguescalequestionnairevalidationofthepersianversion
AT saraeimaryam millionvisualanaloguescalequestionnairevalidationofthepersianversion
AT barsamyalda millionvisualanaloguescalequestionnairevalidationofthepersianversion
AT akbarihamed millionvisualanaloguescalequestionnairevalidationofthepersianversion