Cargando…
En Bloc Spondylectomy for Spinal Metastases: Detailed Oncological Outcomes at a Minimum of 2 Years after Surgery
STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective case series. PURPOSE: To investigate the oncological outcomes, including distant relapse, after en bloc spondylectomy (EBS) for spinal metastases in patients with a minimum of 2-year follow-up. OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE: Although EBS has been reported to be locally curative...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Korean Society of Spine Surgery
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6454284/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30481978 http://dx.doi.org/10.31616/asj.2018.0145 |
_version_ | 1783409546499194880 |
---|---|
author | Ohashi, Masayuki Hirano, Toru Watanabe, Kei Hasegawa, Kazuhiro Ito, Takui Katsumi, Keiichi Shoji, Hirokazu Mizouchi, Tatsuki Takahashi, Ikuko Homma, Takao Endo, Naoto |
author_facet | Ohashi, Masayuki Hirano, Toru Watanabe, Kei Hasegawa, Kazuhiro Ito, Takui Katsumi, Keiichi Shoji, Hirokazu Mizouchi, Tatsuki Takahashi, Ikuko Homma, Takao Endo, Naoto |
author_sort | Ohashi, Masayuki |
collection | PubMed |
description | STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective case series. PURPOSE: To investigate the oncological outcomes, including distant relapse, after en bloc spondylectomy (EBS) for spinal metastases in patients with a minimum of 2-year follow-up. OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE: Although EBS has been reported to be locally curative and extend survival in select patients with spinal metastases, detailed reports regarding the control of distant relapse after EBS are lacking. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of 18 consecutive patients (median age at EBS, 62 years; range, 40–77 years) who underwent EBS for spinal metastases between 1991 and 2015. The primary cancer sites included the kidney (n=7), thyroid (n=4), liver (n=3), and other locations (n=4). Survival rates were estimated using the Kaplan–Meier method, and groups were compared using the log-rank method. RESULTS: The median operative time and intraoperative blood loss were 767.5 minutes and 2,375 g, respectively. Twelve patients (66.7%) experienced perioperative complications. Five patients (27.8%) experienced local recurrence of the tumor at a median of 12.5 months after EBS, four of which had a positive resection margin status. Thirteen patients (72.2%) experienced distant relapse at a median of 21 months after EBS. The estimated median survival period after distant relapse was 20 months (95% confidence interval, 0.71–39.29 months). No association was found between resection margin status and distant relapse. Overall, the 2-year, 5-year, and 10-year survival rates after EBS were 72.2%, 48.8%, and 27.1%, respectively. Importantly, the era in which EBS was performed did not impact the oncological outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that EBS by itself, even if margin-free, cannot prevent further dissemination, which occurred in >70% of patients at a median of 21 months after EBS. These results should be considered and conveyed to patients for clinical decision-making. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6454284 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Korean Society of Spine Surgery |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-64542842019-04-19 En Bloc Spondylectomy for Spinal Metastases: Detailed Oncological Outcomes at a Minimum of 2 Years after Surgery Ohashi, Masayuki Hirano, Toru Watanabe, Kei Hasegawa, Kazuhiro Ito, Takui Katsumi, Keiichi Shoji, Hirokazu Mizouchi, Tatsuki Takahashi, Ikuko Homma, Takao Endo, Naoto Asian Spine J Clinical Study STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective case series. PURPOSE: To investigate the oncological outcomes, including distant relapse, after en bloc spondylectomy (EBS) for spinal metastases in patients with a minimum of 2-year follow-up. OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE: Although EBS has been reported to be locally curative and extend survival in select patients with spinal metastases, detailed reports regarding the control of distant relapse after EBS are lacking. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of 18 consecutive patients (median age at EBS, 62 years; range, 40–77 years) who underwent EBS for spinal metastases between 1991 and 2015. The primary cancer sites included the kidney (n=7), thyroid (n=4), liver (n=3), and other locations (n=4). Survival rates were estimated using the Kaplan–Meier method, and groups were compared using the log-rank method. RESULTS: The median operative time and intraoperative blood loss were 767.5 minutes and 2,375 g, respectively. Twelve patients (66.7%) experienced perioperative complications. Five patients (27.8%) experienced local recurrence of the tumor at a median of 12.5 months after EBS, four of which had a positive resection margin status. Thirteen patients (72.2%) experienced distant relapse at a median of 21 months after EBS. The estimated median survival period after distant relapse was 20 months (95% confidence interval, 0.71–39.29 months). No association was found between resection margin status and distant relapse. Overall, the 2-year, 5-year, and 10-year survival rates after EBS were 72.2%, 48.8%, and 27.1%, respectively. Importantly, the era in which EBS was performed did not impact the oncological outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that EBS by itself, even if margin-free, cannot prevent further dissemination, which occurred in >70% of patients at a median of 21 months after EBS. These results should be considered and conveyed to patients for clinical decision-making. Korean Society of Spine Surgery 2019-04 2018-11-29 /pmc/articles/PMC6454284/ /pubmed/30481978 http://dx.doi.org/10.31616/asj.2018.0145 Text en Copyright © 2019 by Korean Society of Spine Surgery This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Clinical Study Ohashi, Masayuki Hirano, Toru Watanabe, Kei Hasegawa, Kazuhiro Ito, Takui Katsumi, Keiichi Shoji, Hirokazu Mizouchi, Tatsuki Takahashi, Ikuko Homma, Takao Endo, Naoto En Bloc Spondylectomy for Spinal Metastases: Detailed Oncological Outcomes at a Minimum of 2 Years after Surgery |
title | En Bloc Spondylectomy for Spinal Metastases: Detailed Oncological Outcomes at a Minimum of 2 Years after Surgery |
title_full | En Bloc Spondylectomy for Spinal Metastases: Detailed Oncological Outcomes at a Minimum of 2 Years after Surgery |
title_fullStr | En Bloc Spondylectomy for Spinal Metastases: Detailed Oncological Outcomes at a Minimum of 2 Years after Surgery |
title_full_unstemmed | En Bloc Spondylectomy for Spinal Metastases: Detailed Oncological Outcomes at a Minimum of 2 Years after Surgery |
title_short | En Bloc Spondylectomy for Spinal Metastases: Detailed Oncological Outcomes at a Minimum of 2 Years after Surgery |
title_sort | en bloc spondylectomy for spinal metastases: detailed oncological outcomes at a minimum of 2 years after surgery |
topic | Clinical Study |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6454284/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30481978 http://dx.doi.org/10.31616/asj.2018.0145 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ohashimasayuki enblocspondylectomyforspinalmetastasesdetailedoncologicaloutcomesataminimumof2yearsaftersurgery AT hiranotoru enblocspondylectomyforspinalmetastasesdetailedoncologicaloutcomesataminimumof2yearsaftersurgery AT watanabekei enblocspondylectomyforspinalmetastasesdetailedoncologicaloutcomesataminimumof2yearsaftersurgery AT hasegawakazuhiro enblocspondylectomyforspinalmetastasesdetailedoncologicaloutcomesataminimumof2yearsaftersurgery AT itotakui enblocspondylectomyforspinalmetastasesdetailedoncologicaloutcomesataminimumof2yearsaftersurgery AT katsumikeiichi enblocspondylectomyforspinalmetastasesdetailedoncologicaloutcomesataminimumof2yearsaftersurgery AT shojihirokazu enblocspondylectomyforspinalmetastasesdetailedoncologicaloutcomesataminimumof2yearsaftersurgery AT mizouchitatsuki enblocspondylectomyforspinalmetastasesdetailedoncologicaloutcomesataminimumof2yearsaftersurgery AT takahashiikuko enblocspondylectomyforspinalmetastasesdetailedoncologicaloutcomesataminimumof2yearsaftersurgery AT hommatakao enblocspondylectomyforspinalmetastasesdetailedoncologicaloutcomesataminimumof2yearsaftersurgery AT endonaoto enblocspondylectomyforspinalmetastasesdetailedoncologicaloutcomesataminimumof2yearsaftersurgery |