Cargando…

Optimization of antibiotic selection in the emergency department for urine culture follow ups, a retrospective pre-post intervention study: clinical pharmacist efforts

INTRODUCTION: Urinary tract infections (UTI) are commonly encountered in the emergency department (ED). ED culture follow up is an important tool to provide the appropriate therapy after the identification of the causative pathogen. There is a growing body of evidence for the positive role of pharma...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Almulhim, Abdulaziz Saleh, Aldayyen, Ali, Yenina, Kateryna, Chiappini, Adam, Khan, Tahir Mehmood
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6454615/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31007933
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40545-019-0168-z
_version_ 1783409571889414144
author Almulhim, Abdulaziz Saleh
Aldayyen, Ali
Yenina, Kateryna
Chiappini, Adam
Khan, Tahir Mehmood
author_facet Almulhim, Abdulaziz Saleh
Aldayyen, Ali
Yenina, Kateryna
Chiappini, Adam
Khan, Tahir Mehmood
author_sort Almulhim, Abdulaziz Saleh
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Urinary tract infections (UTI) are commonly encountered in the emergency department (ED). ED culture follow up is an important tool to provide the appropriate therapy after the identification of the causative pathogen. There is a growing body of evidence for the positive role of pharmacists in following up the ED cultures. The purpose of this study was to compare pharmacist driven urine culture follow ups to the nurse-practitioner (NP) driven follow ups in term of the appropriateness of antibiotic selections in patients with resistant isolates, inappropriately treated asymptomatic bacteriuria, and inappropriately chosen antibiotic. METHODOLOGY: This was a retrospective pre-post intervention study divided into a two group period to compare pharmacist to NP led ED culture follow up interventions. Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 20 was used for analysis. Student’s t-test was used for continuous variables and Chi-square test/or fisher’s-exact test when appropriate were used for the primary outcome. RESULTS: Fifty-five patients (25.7%) and 102 (34%) met the inclusion criteria in the pharmacist arm and in the NP arm, respectively. Escherichia coli was the most commonly isolated pathogen in both arms. Asymptomatic bacteriuria was often treated in the ED in both groups (45/157, 28.7%) and there were no efforts in discontinuation of antibiotics in these patients. Neither the interventions group nor the no interventions groups were statistically different between the pharmacist and NP arms (P 0.0778), (P 0.797), respectively. CONCLUSION: No statistically significant difference was observed between pharmacist driven monitoring and NP driven monitoring. In our institution, asymptomatic bacteriuria was commonly treated even in the absence of indications. We recommend that Pharmacists’ roles in the ED cultures follow up be expanded to include antibiotic discontinuation in patients who meet asymptomatic bacteriuria criteria or have confirmed negative urine culture. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s40545-019-0168-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6454615
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64546152019-04-19 Optimization of antibiotic selection in the emergency department for urine culture follow ups, a retrospective pre-post intervention study: clinical pharmacist efforts Almulhim, Abdulaziz Saleh Aldayyen, Ali Yenina, Kateryna Chiappini, Adam Khan, Tahir Mehmood J Pharm Policy Pract Research INTRODUCTION: Urinary tract infections (UTI) are commonly encountered in the emergency department (ED). ED culture follow up is an important tool to provide the appropriate therapy after the identification of the causative pathogen. There is a growing body of evidence for the positive role of pharmacists in following up the ED cultures. The purpose of this study was to compare pharmacist driven urine culture follow ups to the nurse-practitioner (NP) driven follow ups in term of the appropriateness of antibiotic selections in patients with resistant isolates, inappropriately treated asymptomatic bacteriuria, and inappropriately chosen antibiotic. METHODOLOGY: This was a retrospective pre-post intervention study divided into a two group period to compare pharmacist to NP led ED culture follow up interventions. Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 20 was used for analysis. Student’s t-test was used for continuous variables and Chi-square test/or fisher’s-exact test when appropriate were used for the primary outcome. RESULTS: Fifty-five patients (25.7%) and 102 (34%) met the inclusion criteria in the pharmacist arm and in the NP arm, respectively. Escherichia coli was the most commonly isolated pathogen in both arms. Asymptomatic bacteriuria was often treated in the ED in both groups (45/157, 28.7%) and there were no efforts in discontinuation of antibiotics in these patients. Neither the interventions group nor the no interventions groups were statistically different between the pharmacist and NP arms (P 0.0778), (P 0.797), respectively. CONCLUSION: No statistically significant difference was observed between pharmacist driven monitoring and NP driven monitoring. In our institution, asymptomatic bacteriuria was commonly treated even in the absence of indications. We recommend that Pharmacists’ roles in the ED cultures follow up be expanded to include antibiotic discontinuation in patients who meet asymptomatic bacteriuria criteria or have confirmed negative urine culture. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s40545-019-0168-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2019-04-09 /pmc/articles/PMC6454615/ /pubmed/31007933 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40545-019-0168-z Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Almulhim, Abdulaziz Saleh
Aldayyen, Ali
Yenina, Kateryna
Chiappini, Adam
Khan, Tahir Mehmood
Optimization of antibiotic selection in the emergency department for urine culture follow ups, a retrospective pre-post intervention study: clinical pharmacist efforts
title Optimization of antibiotic selection in the emergency department for urine culture follow ups, a retrospective pre-post intervention study: clinical pharmacist efforts
title_full Optimization of antibiotic selection in the emergency department for urine culture follow ups, a retrospective pre-post intervention study: clinical pharmacist efforts
title_fullStr Optimization of antibiotic selection in the emergency department for urine culture follow ups, a retrospective pre-post intervention study: clinical pharmacist efforts
title_full_unstemmed Optimization of antibiotic selection in the emergency department for urine culture follow ups, a retrospective pre-post intervention study: clinical pharmacist efforts
title_short Optimization of antibiotic selection in the emergency department for urine culture follow ups, a retrospective pre-post intervention study: clinical pharmacist efforts
title_sort optimization of antibiotic selection in the emergency department for urine culture follow ups, a retrospective pre-post intervention study: clinical pharmacist efforts
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6454615/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31007933
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40545-019-0168-z
work_keys_str_mv AT almulhimabdulazizsaleh optimizationofantibioticselectionintheemergencydepartmentforurineculturefollowupsaretrospectiveprepostinterventionstudyclinicalpharmacistefforts
AT aldayyenali optimizationofantibioticselectionintheemergencydepartmentforurineculturefollowupsaretrospectiveprepostinterventionstudyclinicalpharmacistefforts
AT yeninakateryna optimizationofantibioticselectionintheemergencydepartmentforurineculturefollowupsaretrospectiveprepostinterventionstudyclinicalpharmacistefforts
AT chiappiniadam optimizationofantibioticselectionintheemergencydepartmentforurineculturefollowupsaretrospectiveprepostinterventionstudyclinicalpharmacistefforts
AT khantahirmehmood optimizationofantibioticselectionintheemergencydepartmentforurineculturefollowupsaretrospectiveprepostinterventionstudyclinicalpharmacistefforts